SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ferland

Créé par: Buds92
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 2 juill. 2019
Publié: 2 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 300 000 $
28 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
45 000 000 $
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Ceci, Cody [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 259 699 $0 $0 $1 240 301 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
8 300 000 $8 300 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 juill. 2019 à 15 h 50
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,027
Mentions "j'aime": 22,964
You shouldn't be paying 40 point players 5m. Leafs are paying 45 point players 3.2m to 3.4m. Leafs certainly need Dmen more than another LWer.
2 juill. 2019 à 15 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 435
Mentions "j'aime": 124
Quoting: palhal
You shouldn't be paying 40 point players 5m. Leafs are paying 45 point players 3.2m to 3.4m. Leafs certainly need Dmen more than another LWer.


Exactly! keep the cap space open to hopefully re sign Barrie, can always use a little cap space at the trade deadline to add depth as well
NR1203 a aimé ceci.
2 juill. 2019 à 15 h 55
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 156
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: palhal
You shouldn't be paying 40 point players 5m. Leafs are paying 45 point players 3.2m to 3.4m. Leafs certainly need Dmen more than another LWer.


I guess but you can never win with these AAV's. If i put 4M ppl would freak out saying no way he gets less than 5. Ferland gets 5 because he can protect your 45 point players as well as your 80-90 point players.
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 0
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,027
Mentions "j'aime": 22,964
Quoting: Buds92
I guess but you can never win with these AAV's. If i put 4M ppl would freak out saying no way he gets less than 5. Ferland gets 5 because he can protect your 45 point players as well as your 80-90 point players.


I understand point and value of players but Ferland ? He fell off the cliff after his strong first half. One goal in his last 24 games. And it crazy to spend that cap on LWer if it forces you to play non NHLers Petrovic and Borgman on defence in the top 6.
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 156
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: palhal
I understand point and value of players but Ferland ? He fell off the cliff after his strong first half. One goal in his last 24 games. And it crazy to spend that cap on LWer if it forces you to play non NHLers Petrovic and Borgman on defence in the top 6.


He was playing through injuries the last half of the season and into the playoffs. I understand Defense is a priority but i’d rather Ferland and that D core whichever way you want the bottom pair (Marincin, Gravel, Holl, Harpur) rather than no Ferland and have Cody Ceci making 4.5 to play on the bottom pair. Or if Ceci can be moved you could still sign a decent bottom pair D for 1.5-2M or so
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 19
#6
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,057
Mentions "j'aime": 3,760
Rather sure up the D then get another FW
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,145
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Stop signing Ferland, just cause you have little cap space doesn't mean you use it especially on a Ferland type player. Not needed.
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 22
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,145
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Buds92
He was playing through injuries the last half of the season and into the playoffs. I understand Defense is a priority but i’d rather Ferland and that D core whichever way you want the bottom pair (Marincin, Gravel, Holl, Harpur) rather than no Ferland and have Cody Ceci making 4.5 to play on the bottom pair. Or if Ceci can be moved you could still sign a decent bottom pair D for 1.5-2M or so


If the Leafs Ice Ceci he'll play with Rielly to boost his numbers. Ceci at 4.5 for a year is way better than Ferland at 4/5 x 4/5
2 juill. 2019 à 16 h 58
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 156
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Boomer125
Stop signing Ferland, just cause you have little cap space doesn't mean you use it especially on a Ferland type player. Not needed.


What do you mean a Ferland type? Someone who plays physical? If thats what you mean then it is definately needed on the Leafs roster. Also Ceci would not be playing first pairing minutes he is terrible.
2 juill. 2019 à 17 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,145
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Buds92
What do you mean a Ferland type? Someone who plays physical? If thats what you mean then it is definately needed on the Leafs roster. Also Ceci would not be playing first pairing minutes he is terrible.


Leafs do that style of player, just not at 4/5 million per. And yes Ceci will be paired with Rielly and Barrie with Muzzin
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage