SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trouba Trade

Créé par: Sledgie
Équipe: 2019-20 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2019
Publié: 10 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 250 000 $
77 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 850 000 $
66 250 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Hughes, Jack
3925 000 $
Transactions
NJD
WPG
  1. Vatanen, Sami (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Zacha, Pavel [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (DAL)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2020
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2021
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $65 370 000 $0 $3 567 500 $17 630 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
749 167 $749 167 $ (Bonis de performance42 500 $$42K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Hughes, Jack
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 2
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $
DG/DD
RFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 416 667 $1 416 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
757 500 $757 500 $ (Bonis de performance42 500 $$42K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Hughes, J.
 
Avantage numérique 2
Infériorité numérique 1
Infériorité numérique 2
 
 

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juin 2019 à 19 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 4,275
Mentions "j'aime": 1,156
I would think that probably does it. Vatanen at $3m May be a little much tho for WPG
Sledgie a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2019 à 19 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,923
Mentions "j'aime": 2,009
I'm fine with DK but that makes the return less going to Winnipeg.
Zacha should not be part of that deal imo
10 juin 2019 à 19 h 42
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 25
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: linehan10
I would think that probably does it. Vatanen at $3m May be a little much tho for WPG


I have to admit I don't watch the Jets much being on the East coast and all so I'm not sure what they need most, but Vatanen is a very solid 3 or 4 defenseman who's great on the PP and is fine in a pinch on the PK. Also there's the Finnish connection with Laine. Cap savings from dealing DK in this so they can go for some good players in a deep forward FA period this summer and Vatanen would probably resign for a modest price with a contender like the Jets.
10 juin 2019 à 19 h 47
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 25
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Smitty426
I'm fine with DK but that makes the return less going to Winnipeg.
Zacha should not be part of that deal imo


I mean.... you have to give up something to get something and Trouba is definitely something. Hes a bonafide number 1 defender in this league who still has his whole prime ahead of him. I'm a devils fan and even I get sick of seeing the package deals for good players that include Mueller, Mcleod, and JQ. I think Zacha would be an incredible fit with the Jets on a cheap RFA bridge deal to see if they can finally break all the potential brewing in him.

Devils shouldn't rush out and trade Zacha for scraps, the prospect of a 1-2-3-4 down the center of Nico, Hughes, Zacha, and Zajac sounds incredible. But Hughes definitely makes him expendable as a 3C. Having him reach his potential and never have the possibility of being more then that cause hes being blocked by Nico and Hughes is a luxury NJ cant afford if it brings a star defenseman.
10 juin 2019 à 20 h 4
#5
Shaners79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Does anyone think Calgary is worth hitting up for maybe TJ Brodie. He's not Trouba by any means but he would be I think a decent 2nd pairing d man and he plays on right but shoots left.
10 juin 2019 à 21 h 3
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 25
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Shaners79
Does anyone think Calgary is worth hitting up for maybe TJ Brodie. He's not Trouba by any means but he would be I think a decent 2nd pairing d man and he plays on right but shoots left.


I think so, I like Trouba more, if nothing else because of age and RFA status. Brodie only has 1 year to UFA and will be 30 then. But if it doesn't work with Trouba, think he is an above average plan B.
10 juin 2019 à 21 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,923
Mentions "j'aime": 2,009
Quoting: Sledgie
I mean.... you have to give up something to get something and Trouba is definitely something. Hes a bonafide number 1 defender in this league who still has his whole prime ahead of him. I'm a devils fan and even I get sick of seeing the package deals for good players that include Mueller, Mcleod, and JQ. I think Zacha would be an incredible fit with the Jets on a cheap RFA bridge deal to see if they can finally break all the potential brewing in him.

Devils shouldn't rush out and trade Zacha for scraps, the prospect of a 1-2-3-4 down the center of Nico, Hughes, Zacha, and Zajac sounds incredible. But Hughes definitely makes him expendable as a 3C. Having him reach his potential and never have the possibility of being more then that cause hes being blocked by Nico and Hughes is a luxury NJ cant afford if it brings a star defenseman.


Completely agree.
But if you're sick of the Devs pkgs., you should see what other teams are suggesting! Trouba wont be given away, but the cap dump of Kulikov/Perrault etc has weight and make the return less. We are allowing them some breathing room. I would never suggest a Q/Mueller/Carrick pkg, but some grouping of Santini/Mcleod, along with pick(s) a retained Vats and a conditional pick if he does not resign and a dump, is not a bad pkg. Their window is now, so getting a 1A RHD for $2.4M who plays 21 minutes has value.
NYRs are offering Pionk, Kreider and a 1st. We can/have do better.
10 juin 2019 à 21 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,923
Mentions "j'aime": 2,009
Quoting: Sledgie
I think so, I like Trouba more, if nothing else because of age and RFA status. Brodie only has 1 year to UFA and will be 30 then. But if it doesn't work with Trouba, think he is an above average plan B.


Saw on the web today that he can be had for pick(s)/prospect(s).
Didn't seem like much, apparently Calgary fans were not happy with his play in the PO's
I think its a good move until we see if Smitty is the real deal. I ideally would like both of them. As Cangy said at the end of the season, "you may not see half of these defenders back next year"
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage