SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cap Space and picks

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 6 juin 2019
Publié: 6 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Please let me know if I’m even close on any values. I know the panthers trade is rough, but I factored in Q’s love of seabrook.

Also, besides Dzingel, I didn’t really focus on free agents.

Draft picks are for either byram/Turcotte or byram/zegras.

Apologies if this is way off, just looking for opinions.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
2800 000 $
2900 000 $
1900 000 $
2850 000 $
21 200 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 500 000 $
11 100 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (PIT)
2.
FLA
  1. Seabrook, Brent
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
3.
CHI
  1. Lewis, Trevor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (LAK)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 000 000 $53 111 794 $0 $6 765 000 $29 888 206 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 733 333 $2 733 333 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juin 2019 à 16 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 55
Mentions "j'aime": 3
It’s definitely going to need to be way more going to FLA than a 2nd rounder even if Tallon and Q love Seabs and really want him. You’re going to need to include at least someone like Beaudin and maybe two more 2nds or a 2nd plus a conditional 1st. As for the LAK deal, it’s an underpayment. To get the 5OA from a team that is rebuilding their prospect pool, you are going to need to surrender at least Boqvist, 2019 2nd, and 2020 1st to get the conversation started. LAK is not looking to take on Saad’s contract and one year of Gus.
6 juin 2019 à 16 h 47
#2
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,923
Mentions "j'aime": 4,651
1st trade) Ottawa doesn't need to do that. Yes, they can get to the cap floor but they're not giving up picks. Picks are what they need. Also, no reason for Chicago to do it. You could probably get more from another team.
2nd trade) Florida wouldn't do that IMO. Nobody wants that Seabrook contract.
3rd trade) LA's getting a good return. I think Gustafsson is underrated. He got 60 points this year. But it was 1 really good year. And LA is rebuilding (or at least getting younger). No reason to trade 5OA.
6 juin 2019 à 16 h 49
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
1st trade) Ottawa doesn't need to do that. Yes, they can get to the cap floor but they're not giving up picks. Picks are what they need. Also, no reason for Chicago to do it. You could probably get more from another team.
2nd trade) Florida wouldn't do that IMO. Nobody wants that Seabrook contract.
3rd trade) LA's getting a good return. I think Gustafsson is underrated. He got 60 points this year. But it was 1 really good year. And LA is rebuilding (or at least getting younger). No reason to trade 5OA.


What if you were to replace seabrook in that trade for Keith?
6 juin 2019 à 17 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,674
Mentions "j'aime": 5,857
I think LA would do this trade. They shouldn't. But I think they would. They already came out and said they're not looking to rebuild and that they think they can contend again next season.
Don't even bother with seabrook trades. It'd cost too much in prospects and picks to get anyone to take him. Plus he'd have to waive his NMC. He's gonna be a hawk for awhile.
6 juin 2019 à 18 h 4
#5
HawksFan2334
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 25
Mentions "j'aime": 2
1st trade: Anisimov is getting moved either way so I don't think you need to include another player
2nd trade: I personally think Seabrook goes to FL someway. whats the cost? I don't know but he will be a Panther one way or another.
3rd trade: I would go the route of Saad, Gustafsson, Beaudin, and Sikura OR Perlini and a 2020 second for the 5th. The Hawks definately have a log jam at D so trading Beaudin is ok as you still have Boqvist, mitchell, and Jokiharju. Then with the 5th pick i would package it with the 3rd and a 2020 1st and go 1st overall for Hughes. Yes Hughes is really good but the devils get 2 good players this year and a pick next year.
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2019 à 18 h 16
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: jregs23
1st trade: Anisimov is getting moved either way so I don't think you need to include another player
2nd trade: I personally think Seabrook goes to FL someway. whats the cost? I don't know but he will be a Panther one way or another.
3rd trade: I would go the route of Saad, Gustafsson, Beaudin, and Sikura OR Perlini and a 2020 second for the 5th. The Hawks definately have a log jam at D so trading Beaudin is ok as you still have Boqvist, mitchell, and Jokiharju. Then with the 5th pick i would package it with the 3rd and a 2020 1st and go 1st overall for Hughes. Yes Hughes is really good but the devils get 2 good players this year and a pick next year.


Personally, I’d rather keep the 2 top fives if we got them and just took two players for the future. That’s just me, more quality. However, I don’t think I’d give up beaudin. I’d give up Mitchell because our log jam is full of RHDs, and beaudin is the lone LHD. Otherwise, I do like your trade suggestion.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage