PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
jregs23
HawksFan2334
Membre depuis
5 juin 2019
Équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
25
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 juin 2019 à 0 h 31
Sujet:
Blackhawks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Danville1999</b></div><div>1) Seabrook isn't getting traded but he has a full NMC and likely won't waive it.
2) The Hawks aren't going to rush Kirby Dach to the NHL roster on Opening Night.
3) Kubalik is not going to be a healthy scratch. He either makes it on one of the four lines (likely) or goes to Rockford.
4) If you're doing an Anisimov trade, you'll have to give Los Angeles picks for taking on the salary, not get the good picks back.</div></div>
1) I think Hawks tell Seabrook waive your NTC or you'll be a 7th defencemen and i don't think he wants to be a 7th dman OR he waives to a team so they can buy him out (OTT)
2) hawks have 9 games to figure out if Dach can be impactful this year or he gets sent to Juniors. If he gets sent to juniors before the 9 games they dont burn off a year of his ELC. if he plays more than 9 games his cap hit counts
3) Agreed
4) anisimovs contract is actually not bad post july 1 and he can get traded anywhere (his NTC goes away) and i think he can still make an impact on a team just not on the hawks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 juin 2019 à 0 h 20
Sujet:
moves after De Haan
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Petrock83</b></div><div>Murphy for Brown makes sense, Gus for Brown is awful. Leafs need to add quite a bit more.</div></div>
I think the leafs are looking to make moves based off the Marner Situation and this move saves them almost a million and gives them a Defensemen to run their power play. Also, i dont see them trading Murphy based on how many years left he has and his cap hit. I think he is a solid top 4 guy for the Hawks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 juin 2019 à 0 h 11
Sujet:
DEFENCE JUST BECAME A STRENTH
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Frank_Booth</b></div><div>Kapanen does not have a contract yet. so, this is wrong.</div></div>
TOR, more or less, has an agreement in place with Kasperi Kapanen on an extension. Not expected to be formalized until TOR cap (Marner) situation clarified. It will be a 3 year deal with an AAV in the $3.2M to $3.4M range.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 juin 2019 à 0 h 10
Sujet:
DEFENCE JUST BECAME A STRENTH
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>babouie</b></div><div>I just read the link you sent there is no signed contract it says they think he might have a deal in place thats all . There is no confirmed contract signing anywhere</div></div>
i never said a contract was signed. They dont think they have an agreement in place they already do have a hand shake deal in place. The tweet from McKenzie says it wont be signed until Marner situation gets clarified.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 juin 2019 à 23 h 57
Sujet:
DEFENCE JUST BECAME A STRENTH
Kapanen already has a contract in place with the leafs <a href="https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2019/06/22/kasperi-kapanen-expected-to-sign-three-year-3-2-3-4-million-contract/" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2019/06/22/kasperi-kapanen-expected-to-sign-three-year-3-2-3-4-million-contract/</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 juin 2019 à 20 h 41
Sujet:
Making it work-Hawks Sabres trades see ya Patches
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Skyraider112</b></div><div>Karlsson will command 7-8 mil</div></div>
hes already signed for "a shade under 6 million" <a href="https://www.tsn.ca/golden-knights-to-sign-forward-william-karlsson-to-eight-year-extension-1.1327290" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.tsn.ca/golden-knights-to-sign-forward-william-karlsson-to-eight-year-extension-1.1327290</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2019 à 16 h 14
Sujet:
WPG VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>1) Part of the defensive issues the Hawks had, was due to the offense. The last couple years, and worse this year then the prior, was the amount of turnovers in the offensive and neutral zones, odd man rushes and puck possession was dismal in the offensive zone. Those are large in part offensive issues.
2) Kubalik, Kurashev, Barrett and Entwistle are all projected as bottom 6 guys. Kubalik and Kurashev are arguably top 9 guys. The problem is, outside of Turcotte if that's who the Hawks draft, the Hawks have zero top 6 forwards in the prospect pool. That is problematic. Beaudin, Mitchell, Boqvist, Jokiharju are all higher end prospects then anyone we have on offense outside of Turcotte and maybe one could argue Kubalik and Mitchell are about even in their ceilings.
3) If you watched Gus closely, he made dramatic improvements in this defensive game between the start of the season and the end. The last 30 games of the season, he was certainly very serviceable defensively and better then the rotation of 3rd liners (Dahlstrom, Koekko, and Forsling) defensively. Watching his improvement over the past season and a half, was remarkable in my opinion. If he keeps improving this coming year defensively, we have a solidified top liner.
4) Seabs has been pretty forward that he's not waiving and wants to retire a Hawk, going beyond that to say he hopes he can work for the organization when he retires. If that's the case, maybe he would retire early?</div></div>
1) that's where I disagree. I saw plenty of times this year when the hawks D couldn't clear and turned the puck over (in their own zone/neutral zone) . Sure there are the turnovers by the offense but the defense should have been able to defend some of those rushes. Also when Delia was in net, he gave up a lot of rebounds which the other team would score. How come the defense couldn't clear those pucks? Most of the better teams are able too. Don't even get me started on the PK.
2) Point is the hawks have to look at the long term and i don't forsee them bringing in a big name forward when you have to lock up 2-3 of your forwards to massive contracts. You have a line like
#3 overall-Toews-Kane, Kahun-strome-Debrincat as your top 6 so basically you are filling up your bottom 6 with those prospects/depth guys. Not all prospects work out. ill point you to Jack Skillie and Pirri on that subject.
3) Obviously you value Gus more valuable than I do he there are better top 4 defensemen in this league that the hawks can go out and get. No way am i going to pay what he demands in his next contract. Especially when they either bring in someone (trade/FA) or promote internally for cheaper, he seems like the odd man out.
4) I don't think he never said he was waiving, there were reports out there that he was asked at the TDL but he denied that he was asked. He can retire a hawks like Sharp, Campbell, and Bickell all did. There are certain teams i think he would waive for and 2 of those teams are FLA and VAN. Maybe when the expansion draft comes he will waive for Seattle.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2019 à 15 h 38
Sujet:
WPG VGK
1) that's where I disagree. I saw plenty of times this year when the hawks D couldn't clear and turned the puck over (in their own zone/neutral zone) . Sure there are the turnovers by the offense but the defense should have been able to defend some of those rushes. Also when Delia was in net, he gave up a lot of rebounds which the other team would score. How come the defense couldn't clear those pucks? Most of the better teams are able too. Don't even get me started on the PK.
2) Point is the hawks have to look at the long term and i don't forsee them bringing in a big name forward when you have to lock up 2-3 of your forwards to massive contracts. You have a line like
#3 overall-Toews-Kane, Kahun-strome-Debrincat as your top 6 so basically you are filling up your bottom 6 with those prospects/depth guys. Not all prospects work out. ill point you to Jack Skillie and Pirri on that subject.
3) Obviously you value Gus more valuable than I do he there are better top 4 defensemen in this league that the hawks can go out and get. No way am i going to pay what he demands in his next contract. Especially when they either bring in someone (trade/FA) or promote internally for cheaper, he seems like the odd man out.
4) I don't think he never said he was waiving, there were reports out there that he was asked at the TDL but he denied that he was asked. He can retire a hawks like Sharp, Campbell, and Bickell all did. There are certain teams i think he would waive for and 2 of those teams are FLA and VAN. Maybe when the expansion draft comes he will waive for Seattle.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2019 à 14 h 51
Sujet:
WPG VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>If they get Byram, they would be able to move Beaudin potentially.
I doubt the Hawks grab any huge defensive name like Trouba or EK. Hawks have Beaudin, Boqvist, Mitchell, Jokiharju, Krys, Carlsson already in just the prospects...that pretty much solidifies the future defense and any big name defender is going to be looking for a big long term contract that will put us back in the same shoes we are in on D with an aging Seabs and Keith.
Beyond the prospects, Seabs and Keith aren't going anywhere for another 4 years, plus Gus has shown he is one of the best offensive D guys in the league. Hawks aren't making a run for the cup this season, so grabbing a big name defender is unlikely.
What is much more likely is grabbing a big name forward due to the simple fact the Hawks don't have anywhere near the depth in forward prospects that they have on defense and they have at least 1 glaring hole to fill in the top 2 lines on the wing.</div></div>
I highly doubt the hawks go out and grab a big name forward. Maybe Dzingel but they have to lock up Strome, DeBrincat and Kahun to extensions after this upcoming season Strome will be 4-5 million a year and Debrincat will be 8=9 million a year. and kahun will be a big one too. I think Defense was more the issue than offense. They do have Kubalik. Kurashev, Barrett, Entwistle and the forward they draft with the 3rd overall all who may project into the roster in the future. You name all these D prospects but what if they don't work out? I would rather have a proven NHL player on Defense that I have control over for 5-7 years than a defensive prospect that you don't know will pan out.
Yeah Gus was one of the best offensive producers on defense this year, But will you pay him 3-4 million a year for someone who gives you nothing defensively? I wouldn't
Personally, I think Stan has shown he can move bad contracts like Sharp, Bickell and Manning and he will ultimately move Seabrooks just a matter of when and how much it costs the hawks to move.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2019 à 13 h 19
Sujet:
WPG VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Hawks aren't moving Boqvist, he is a RHD and Byram is a LHD. Beaudin, the #27th pick last year, is a LHD and becomes moveable if Byram is drafted.
Bottom line, this is irrelevant as every insider report is saying the Hawks are taking Turcotte so the discussion around "if the Hawks draft Byram" is large in part not a likely outcome.</div></div>
Doesn't matter who they take in the draft, they need help on Defense and they will go out and get a top 4 guy either via trade or FA.
Mitchell Boqvist and Jokiharju are all RHD. I really don't see them trading a LHD prospect like Beaudin for Trouba, who is another RHD.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2019 à 12 h 34
Sujet:
WPG VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>Try more like 7 years $56 million for Jacob Trouba, No way in hell he signs for only $7 million per. He wants to get paid. He'll easily make between $8 to $9 million per in free agency.</div></div>
no team is going to give out 2 first, a second and a third for an RFA when he might hit the UFA market next year. I have seen any where from 7-7.5 for trouba on a long term deal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2019 à 12 h 27
Sujet:
WPG VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>"Could a package of forward Brandon Saad, one of those defensive prospects and a second-round pick be enough to pry Trouba away from the Jets? "
First of all that's spit balling. Second, that could mean Saad, Beaudin and a 2nd and likely that's what he mean since Byram and Beaudin are LHD guys. Lastly, nowhere does he say throw in Gus who alone is worth a late 1st round pick. Hawk's aren't giving up Saad, there #1 D prospect and Gus plus a 2nd...that's way overpayment.</div></div>
The jets are asking for a first and a high end prospect. Hawks are unlikely to give up a first and jets are unlikely to accept a Saad Boqvist and second package. Key word in the article is COULD. Could it be enough? Probably not, which is why you have to add another piece. if you think Gus is worth a "late first round pick" then you include him in this deal as Saad/prospect and a second probably wont get it done and the hawks DESPERATELY need help on defense. Also keep in mind that Trouba is a major upgrade form Gus defensively and Trouba had 50 points last year (Gus had 60).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2019 à 9 h 19
Sujet:
WPG VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Agree, that is just brutal for Chicago.</div></div>
if its that brutal then why does Jay Zawaski mention it in this article? <a href="https://670thescore.radio.com/zawaski-blackhawks-notes-rumors-nhl-draft-trade-free-agency" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://670thescore.radio.com/zawaski-blackhawks-notes-rumors-nhl-draft-trade-free-agency</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 juin 2019 à 20 h 21
Sujet:
Moves for 2019-20
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vmach</b></div><div>So by your reasoning, Boston should grab Lucic while they can because they drafted him? But you right Q will reunite wit him, but it will be in 5 years on a golf course. Seabs is a bad contract but he is staying in CHI and probably until he decides to retire. And even If by some miracle he will agree to go to FL, and FL will want him there, it will cost us a lot more than what you proposing. FL will not be giving as Pysik and 4th, but rather it will be us giving them at least Krys + 2nd + something else just to take him.
Its not AA that I was unhappy with, its Gus, you giving away 60 point producer for 2nd? we can do more, especially if he puts up another good season at TDL we can get 1st ++
And Marleau I'm ok with taking, but they will have to give us someone like Kapanen to take him and buy him out, so he can sign with LA, SJS or AR for maybe $1M</div></div>
Seabrook: Yes he has stated he wants to stay here but looking at the future of the defense there is no room for him on it and he might realize this. What is it going to cost to move him? Who knows but he will ultimately get traded. If he cares about the organization and the future it is heading, then he should waive his NTC.
I just don't think Gus is worth a 1st round pick, especially since he will be commanding a lot more than 1.2 million after the season and he is really only known for his offensive ability and only 1 season where he had 60 points, what if he only has 30 points next season? Is he still worth a 1st? We have a log jam at D and I ultimately think Gus isn't in the hawks future plans. Might as well sell him when his value is at its highest.
The real question with Marleau is would he waive to potentially win a cup or waive to for family reasons? Keep in mind he's in the last year of his deal and if bought out it wouldn't affect the hawks cap. They would still have to carry his full cap hit since its a 35+ contract. So why buy him out when you can use him on the third line?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 juin 2019 à 18 h 4
Sujet:
Cap Space and picks
1st trade: Anisimov is getting moved either way so I don't think you need to include another player
2nd trade: I personally think Seabrook goes to FL someway. whats the cost? I don't know but he will be a Panther one way or another.
3rd trade: I would go the route of Saad, Gustafsson, Beaudin, and Sikura OR Perlini and a 2020 second for the 5th. The Hawks definately have a log jam at D so trading Beaudin is ok as you still have Boqvist, mitchell, and Jokiharju. Then with the 5th pick i would package it with the 3rd and a 2020 1st and go 1st overall for Hughes. Yes Hughes is really good but the devils get 2 good players this year and a pick next year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 juin 2019 à 15 h 26
Sujet:
Moves for 2019-20
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vmach</b></div><div>TBL maybe. The rest of the trades = NO from CHI.
And FL trade no from Seabs.</div></div>
Q and Seabrook are going to be reunited one way or another. Whether it is this year or down the road.. Also I believe when Seabrook was drafted Tallon was the GM. i would gladly take a either a high draft pick or a High end prospect for Marleau, who is on the last year of his contract and we have the space to take it on. Anisimov is going to get traded (have you even been following the rumors?). Gus will be commanding a big contract and you still have to pay Strome and Debrincat so i think he will be traded
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 juin 2019 à 15 h 16
Sujet:
Moves for 2019-20
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Gus is worth a 1st and why in the world would you trade him and proceed to sign Gardiner for $5M when Gus is almost $4M less and the same type of player. Then you trade Saad for a 1 year rental in Faulk who we won't need next year. You do realize Boqvist, Mitchell, Byram and Beaudin would all be ready next year...what then?</div></div>
Defense needs improvement. Saad was a third liner this past year and Faulk is a good defensemen on the last year of a deal and i don't think Saad is worth it @ 6 million dollars a year. Gus is in the final year of his contract and will command more than 1.2 million that might be comparable to Gardnier (if you say they are the same type of player). Boqvist, Mitchell, and Beaudin might be ready. If they don't resign faulk and Koekkoek those are 2 spots open. Also, keep that some of them might not work out.. what then? go out and over pay for a Brandon Manning type of player?
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com