Are you drunk?

What is wrong with you?

Brock Boeser is not going anywhere.

you are very funny if you think you get Boeser for Kane...LOL

Is Kane hurt?? He hasn't shown up for the playoffs.

Lol. Kinda what I thought people would comment. Hoped to get some suggestions of the value regarding the trade but looks like people just want to post "wtf" comments.

If I'm Doug Wilson in SJ, I think I'd rather have E. Kane and Labanc for the next 5+ years instead of Boeser and Eriksson. Labanc is improving as fast or faster than Meier and Hertl.

Either way, neither team is looking at this deal.

I don't think the value is far off like everyone is implying. Labanc is a very good and very underrated player. 2 good players for 1 good player and Loui. Would definitely be a blockbuster and a bit hard to process, but it seems fair to me.

San Jose is not dumping 2 players for 1 and cap dump

Boeser is a stud. Van isnt moving him.

That said, Kane to Van is not completely impossible other than dougie would be hesitant to trade within the division. Also, no chance in hell eriksson comes to SJ. 6M per for 4 years is a complete albatross. Kane adds some value, so that would make no sense for the sharks.

Maybe Dougie could target a guy like Virtanen in a kane trade. Maybe Kane for Virtanen straight up. Sharks drop nearly 6M in salary and get a 22 year old who scored 15 goals and has some potential. Vancouver gets a 30 goal scorer signed to a reasonable deal playing in his hometown.

I like the idea of Virtanen but I think there would have to be a pick and/or a prospect in there if Doug were moving a 30 goal scorer coming off a careet high nearly 60 pt season.

All of which is moot because Dougie ain't moving Kane - more's the pity imo.