SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Zanerax

Membre depuis
5 mai 2018
Équipe favorite
Sabres de Buffalo
Deuxième équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
71
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM7 juin 2019 à 10 h 28
Sujet: Buff
Forum: Armchair-GM7 juin 2019 à 9 h 47
Sujet: Buff
Forum: Armchair-GM13 févr. 2019 à 11 h 50
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoganOllivier</b></div><div>...</div></div>

My perception of their RHD situation is as follows (feel free to correct me Canes fans):

Hamilton and Faulk are both offensively potent defensemen who are somewhat liabilities defensively. Faulk is a bit of a PP specialist. With players like that you want to give them favorable matchups where the ice will be tilted in their favor and they will be in the O-zone more often than not (O-zone slanted draws, not being matched against the opposing top line, etc.).

They have Adam Fox putting up 1.4 PPG in college right now, and the perception I have is that he'll be jumping straight to the NHL (next year?). He is another defensemen of that mold.

You can't give all three D-pairings offensively favored matchups. It doesn't work. They can't make optimal use of their players if they trade Peace and roll with Faulk-Hamilton-Fox down the right side. They would be playing to their players weaknesses instead of strengths.

The perception I have of Carolina's plan is that Faulk will walk when his contract is done and will be replaced by Hamilton/Fox (in role and deployment). So he would be the cheapest to trade for (also the least valuable though in my opinion).

Hamilton would be trade able, and if they trade him they may look to re-sign Faulk (probably would?). They would probably be looking for a lesser but capable LHD and help up front (or maybe only one of them depending on the players involved).

I'm not sure where I would peg Peace's theoretical value, but he is their RHD that makes the least sense to trade. Because he is more defensively minded, and they have less players (and less capable players) to fill that niche (Pesce + TVR, <em>maybe</em> McKeown). Whereas they have 2+1 players to fill the offensive D-man niche (we call them puck moving D-men now though).
Forum: Armchair-GM12 févr. 2019 à 18 h 46
Forum: Armchair-GM12 févr. 2019 à 13 h 5