SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

AVS CAN FORFEIT

Créé par: jassan28
Équipe: 2018-19 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 24 avr. 2019
Publié: 24 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2479 500 000 $78 093 334 $0 $1 457 500 $1 406 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 325 000 $3 325 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
717 500 $717 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
825 000 $825 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 635 000 $1 635 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 avr. 2019 à 2 h 4
#1
EthanBearForVezina
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 966
Mentions "j'aime": 337
Yeah I’m sure the refs will guide you past the avs too.
CFMan et brocklesnar a aimé ceci.
24 avr. 2019 à 2 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Why? San Jose only won because of the 5 minute Major for “cross checking”. On that note, yes, it was a cross check but no where near a major for cross checking. It was unfortunate that Stasny was coming through at the same time and bumped into Pavelski causing him to fall and hurt himself, but there was no intent for Eakin to hurt him on the play. So unless Jones continues to play better then he has all season, I don’t see San Jose moving past Colorado, but I could be wrong. That being said it should be a fun exciting series none the less.
24 avr. 2019 à 2 h 57
#3
Burnzie88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Eakin completely cross-checked him hard for no reason. Should it have been a major? That's debatable. You have to give the Sharks props for scoring 4 goals on that, though.
24 avr. 2019 à 3 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,911
Mentions "j'aime": 5,094
Quoting: Ajp_18
Why? San Jose only won because of the 5 minute Major for “cross checking”. On that note, yes, it was a cross check but no where near a major for cross checking. It was unfortunate that Stasny was coming through at the same time and bumped into Pavelski causing him to fall and hurt himself, but there was no intent for Eakin to hurt him on the play. So unless Jones continues to play better then he has all season, I don’t see San Jose moving past Colorado, but I could be wrong. That being said it should be a fun exciting series none the less.


Nonetheless is one word you goof <3
24 avr. 2019 à 3 h 18
#5
Démarrer sujet
GoCanada
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 4,173
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: EthanBearForVezina
Yeah I’m sure the refs will guide you past the avs too.


Quoting: Ajp_18
Why? San Jose only won because of the 5 minute Major for “cross checking”. On that note, yes, it was a cross check but no where near a major for cross checking. It was unfortunate that Stasny was coming through at the same time and bumped into Pavelski causing him to fall and hurt himself, but there was no intent for Eakin to hurt him on the play. So unless Jones continues to play better then he has all season, I don’t see San Jose moving past Colorado, but I could be wrong. That being said it should be a fun exciting series none the less.


Either team could have won but they look very deep vs one deep line of the Avs, also a team shouldn't allow 4 goals while on the PK. SJ pp scores 4 on a PP showing how dangerous their specials team is.
24 avr. 2019 à 3 h 55
#6
EthanBearForVezina
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 966
Mentions "j'aime": 337
Quoting: jassan28
Either team could have won but they look very deep vs one deep line of the Avs, also a team shouldn't allow 4 goals while on the PK. SJ pp scores 4 on a PP showing how dangerous their specials team is.


Who gives a ****? If the officials make the correct call, San Jose would’ve only been able to score one PP goal at best.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
24 avr. 2019 à 12 h 48
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 445
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Rule 609 states that a cross check resulting in an injury is assessed a game misconduct and a five minute major. I thought Stastny was dirty than the Eakin hit.
jassan28 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage