SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuilding - 3 way trade with WSHCGY plus trades with BUF and NYI

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2019-20 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 2 avr. 2019
Publié: 2 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
LA gets: Burakovsky, Dubé, Stone, 2019 1st round pick (CGY), 2019 4th round pick (NYI)

CGY gets: Holtby

WSH gets: Quick(20% retained), Kovalchuk(35% retained), Scherbak, Lazar 2019 3rd round pick (WSH)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
1725 000 $
43 125 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 625 000 $
21 000 000 $
1775 000 $
1725 000 $
1800 000 $
1700 000 $
11 600 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Kakko, Kaapo
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Kovalchuk, Ilya (2 187 500 $ retained)
  2. Quick, Jonathan (1 160 000 $ retained)
  3. Scherbak, Nikita
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (WSH)
2.
LAK
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Lazar, Curtis [Droits de RFA]
  3. Stone, Michael
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (CGY)
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
3.
4.
5.
LAK
  1. Clutterbuck, Cal
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
6.
LAK
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Lintuniemi, Alex [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2020
Logo de LAK
Logo de NYI
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $72 458 448 $0 $682 500 $10 541 552 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 4
Kakko, Kaapo
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 893 750 $1 893 750 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 avr. 2019 à 11 h 48
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
none of that makes sense to me. Why would Washington trade a better goalie in Holtby, and Burakovsky who has finally got his $hit together (sort of) for an overpaid Kovalchuk, a Goalie who is definitely not as good as Holtby, and Scherbak who does not interest me at all at this point. Then you trade Holtby for a Middle/Bottom 6 F in Lazar, a 7th D-man, a decent prospect and a 2nd and a 4th? Makes no sense to me at all. The Clutterbuck and Toffoli trade makes even less sense could get way more for Toffoli.
capsin9 a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2019 à 11 h 50
#2
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
That Holtby trade to CGY is awful.
Shylo_Moxii a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2019 à 11 h 51
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,347
Mentions "j'aime": 353
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
none of that makes sense to me. Why would Washington trade a better goalie in Holtby, and Burakovsky who has finally got his $hit together (sort of) for an overpaid Kovalchuk, a Goalie who is definitely not as good as Holtby, and Scherbak who does not interest me at all at this point. Then you trade Holtby for a Middle/Bottom 6 F in Lazar, a 7th D-man, a decent prospect and a 2nd and a 4th? Makes no sense to me at all. The Clutterbuck and Toffoli trade makes even less sense could get way more for Toffoli.


I agree 100%. Holtby is so underrated if you only look at his stats. Capitals leave him out to dry constantly. Also bura is a .5ppg player since January ....no reason to trade him for aging less talented players.
Shylo_Moxii a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2019 à 11 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
none of that makes sense to me. Why would Washington trade a better goalie in Holtby, and Burakovsky who has finally got his $hit together (sort of) for an overpaid Kovalchuk, a Goalie who is definitely not as good as Holtby, and Scherbak who does not interest me at all at this point. Then you trade Holtby for a Middle/Bottom 6 F in Lazar, a 7th D-man, a decent prospect and a 2nd and a 4th? Makes no sense to me at all. The Clutterbuck and Toffoli trade makes even less sense could get way more for Toffoli.


Reason for WSH trade is that Holtby's most likely leaving after the 2019-20 season since his contract ends. Quick brings them an experienced goalie behind Samsonov at a reasonable cost ($4,5M).
Kovalchuk could also be a solid 50-point player alongside Kuznetsov and Ovechkin, and that's decent for a $4M player.

For CGY trade the reason is that LA as a rebuilding team don't need Holtby, but CGY could use him, since they're lacking a great goalie. LA gets some decent prospects, but they need to add Stone in order to make the money work.

Same goes for the NYI trade. Toffoli is not worth a 1st as of now, but if they take Clutterbuck's contract in the process, they can land a first for him.
2 avr. 2019 à 11 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: McRanteskog
That Holtby trade to CGY is awful.


Love the name lol.
McRanteskog et tydini11 a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2019 à 11 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Reason for WSH trade is that Holtby's most likely leaving after the 2019-20 season since his contract ends. Quick brings them an experienced goalie behind Samsonov at a reasonable cost ($4,5M).
Kovalchuk could also be a solid 50-point player alongside Kuznetsov and Ovechkin, and that's decent for a $4M player.

For CGY trade the reason is that LA as a rebuilding team don't need Holtby, but CGY could use him, since they're lacking a great goalie. LA gets some decent prospects, but they need to add Stone in order to make the money work.

Same goes for the NYI trade. Toffoli is not worth a 1st as of now, but if they take Clutterbuck's contract in the process, they can land a first for him.


But the concept of what you are saying is that Washington has no other choice than to trade Holtby. It doesn't mean he has any less of value. He is still a great Goalie. You can literally get him for face value, but no extra based on need of player value. So no extra value, but at least face value, and face value is a Cup Winning Goalie. Quick is too, but again older not as good anymore.
2 avr. 2019 à 12 h 2
#7
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
But the concept of what you are saying is that Washington has no other choice than to trade Holtby. It doesn't mean he has any less of value. He is still a great Goalie. You can literally get him for face value, but no extra based on need of player value. So no extra value, but at least face value, and face value is a Cup Winning Goalie. Quick is too, but again older not as good anymore.


That I agree with. This trade would only happen if WSH must trade Holtby.
2 avr. 2019 à 12 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,050
Mentions "j'aime": 3,245
Caps could trade Holtby+Bura for a huuuuge return. No way they do it for a meh goalie, a potentially washed up KHLr (hard to tell since he's playing for LA), a 3rd liner at best in Scherbak, and 4th liner in Lazar, and a 3rd.

Holtby alone could get a top 10 pick.
2 avr. 2019 à 13 h 25
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,347
Mentions "j'aime": 353
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Caps could trade Holtby+Bura for a huuuuge return. No way they do it for a meh goalie, a potentially washed up KHLr (hard to tell since he's playing for LA), a 3rd liner at best in Scherbak, and 4th liner in Lazar, and a 3rd.

Holtby alone could get a top 10 pick.


Varlomov a few year back was traded for a forsberg pick and Holtby is way better
ClockReads2113 a aimé ceci.
2 avr. 2019 à 13 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 94
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: capsin9
I agree 100%. Holtby is so underrated if you only look at his stats. Capitals leave him out to dry constantly. Also bura is a .5ppg player since January ....no reason to trade him for aging less talented players.


if u watch the kings play quick gets left out to dry every game too. i fell bad watching him have to suffer with a trash defense. id also rather have playoff quick than just about anyone else in playoffs. not a slight to holtby hes great too
capsin9 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage