Rangers say no. They could get more for Hayes

Rangers give up a 26 year old better player then 30 year old Anisimov + a 4th

It's an interesting trade. It really depends on what direction NYR want to go in. If they want Panarin, they probably can't be selling (2) of their best players @ the TDL and still say...Hey Artemi...come with a cup here! It's just speaking out of both sides of the mouth...and doing it poorly. BUT then again just give him $13M a year and then in 5 years NYR might be contenders once their 1st rounders they're about to get mature.

"That's business baby" ~Panarin

I think NYR should sell and then they can get more for sure.

You're embarrassing us...

Hard pass. Hayes could fetch a lot more than that.

Anisimov & a 4th wouldn't even land you Shattenkirk, let alone Hayes! No sources for that bit of info, because it's just common sense.

Yeah its too little for Hayes, maybe add a 2nd rounder and a prospect D. But Chicago will not want Hayes, he was a Hawk once and didn't want to grow with a team.

Oh man I knew I shouldn't have looked at your recent posts XD XD XD keep it up stan bozo

Lol petty ****

""No way Arizona does this, they gave up on Perlini, and the other "items going back are lackluster" for a top 9 forward and top 4 defensman.""

But AA gets you Kevin Hayes XD

AA has term and Chemisty with Panarin. A conditional 2nd round pick coming back on an extension makes the trade worth it imo.

You wouldn’t know, but there not a lot of trades the Blackhawks can execute. Because of this I’m okay with trying to stretch trades and make risks to see what people think.

well considering Panarin's not on the rangers that "chemistry" is hard to execute =D....but yeah you make amazing trade offers....clearly everyone agrees with you

Side note, how laughable you think AA would matter at all in attracting Panarin...if thats the case the wouldn't the Hawks keep him to get Panarin?

I'm giving you too much time of day but my final note, a conditional 2nd for Hayes is laughable. Hartman got a first and a prospect. Terms be damned you're on something if you think you can only give a conditional second and "nothing" for Hayes

Why should the hawks want Panarin, DeBrincat = Panarin (but possibly better) for the next 10 years.



If you think Anisimov has no value than you are even dumber than I thought.

I was quoting you on that one buddy.

When did I say that Anisimov doesn’t have value?

Also funny how you characterize Anisimov as being worth nothing, but you also think him plus spare parts gets you Hammer+ Hino.

Read what you wrote. I value AA highly, hence the asking for H&H. Just give it a rest guy

I never said I value Anisimov at nothing numb nuts. It would be helpful to get his contract of the books, but that doesn’t imply that he has no value. I suggest taking you head out of your a** before you speak.

resulting to name calling, speaking like a truly defeated man.

Looks like you’ve got nothing else to say, so I suggest you don’t.