SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

COL- CGY- TOR- NSH- CHI- DAL- EDM

Créé par: AJC13
Équipe: 2018-19 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 10 févr. 2019
Publié: 11 févr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Andrighetto, Sven
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Shane Bowers
2.
NYR
  1. Kylington, Oliver
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Zuccarello, Mats (2 250 000 $ retained)
3.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Vladislav Kara
4.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
David Farrance
Patrick Harper
5.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Chad Krys
Jake Wise
CHI
  1. Namestnikov, Vladislav (2 000 000 $ retained)
6.
7.
NYR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Ryan McLeod
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de NYR
Logo de COL
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYR
Logo de TBL
Logo de NYR
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
Logo de DAL
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2779 500 000 $66 896 942 $0 $3 027 500 $12 603 058 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
708 750 $708 750 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
730 000 $730 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
708 750 $708 750 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 févr. 2019 à 10 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Avs will be passing. If this was 2 months ago and an extended Hayes they would...but they have been terrible for 2 months now so they are not moving their 1st round pick.
11 févr. 2019 à 10 h 6
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,771
Mentions "j'aime": 31,482
Decent moves. Imo COL and CGY trades are slight overpayments, and DAL simply does not need Shattenkirk - or his massive contract to be precise.
11 févr. 2019 à 10 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Decent moves. Imo COL and CGY trades are slight overpayments, and DAL simply does not need Shattenkirk - or his massive contract to be precise.


If it was an extended Hayes and based on how things are going...swapped to 2020. Then maybe. They wont be getting the 2019 pick if he is a pure rental.
11 févr. 2019 à 10 h 29
#4
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,771
Mentions "j'aime": 31,482
Quoting: coga16
If it was an extended Hayes and based on how things are going...swapped to 2020. Then maybe. They wont be getting the 2019 pick if he is a pure rental.


Yes. It's rumored that NYR wants a 1st, a top prospect and a prospect for Hayes. Imo they'd be lucky if they get even 2/3 of those.

If they value him that highly, maybe they should be just re-signing him.
11 févr. 2019 à 10 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Yes. It's rumored that NYR wants a 1st, a top prospect and a prospect for Hayes. Imo they'd be lucky if they get even 2/3 of those.

If they value him that highly, maybe they should be just re-signing him.


Yeah Rumoured they want that, and I think it was Friedman or Le Brun who said recently that if they can get a 1st and a prospect for him that the Rangers would be ecstatic....Meaning that they arent getting those offers for him as Rental.

What they want and what they will have to settle on might not align
11 févr. 2019 à 11 h 52
#6
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: coga16
Avs will be passing. If this was 2 months ago and an extended Hayes they would...but they have been terrible for 2 months now so they are not moving their 1st round pick.


Andrighetto is just a RFA throw in that seems to fit in well next season with NYR and conversely has no place at all next season in COL lineup. Basically it's a late 1st round draft pick and a B+plus prospect (Bowers) who's certainly not an A-prospect.

If Andrighetto were not included, it would certainly not hold up the deal. He's just a player COL no longer has a use for and is thrown in because NYR is one of only a few teams in a situation where he'd be in any way a useful player.
11 févr. 2019 à 12 h 0
#7
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: coga16
Yeah Rumoured they want that, and I think it was Friedman or Le Brun who said recently that if they can get a 1st and a prospect for him that the Rangers would be ecstatic....Meaning that they arent getting those offers for him as Rental.

What they want and what they will have to settle on might not align


COL ain't quitting yet! Everyone in the West isn't very good. If NYR were in the west they'd be making moves at the TDL to go on a cup run instead of rebuilding! COL is keeping an open mind when it comes to trading their 1st round pick(s)...
11 févr. 2019 à 12 h 6
#8
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Yes. It's rumored that NYR wants a 1st, a top prospect and a prospect for Hayes. Imo they'd be lucky if they get even 2/3 of those.

If they value him that highly, maybe they should be just re-signing him.


What I listed above proposed is not even 2/3's of what your accusing me of proposing!
11 févr. 2019 à 12 h 7
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,771
Mentions "j'aime": 31,482
Quoting: AJC13
What I listed above proposed is not even 2/3's of what your accusing me of proposing!


1st = 1st
Bowers = prospect

1st+prospect = 2/3 of the rumored assets?

Are you blind?
11 févr. 2019 à 12 h 15
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: AJC13
COL ain't quitting yet! Everyone in the West isn't very good. If NYR were in the west they'd be making moves at the TDL to go on a cup run instead of rebuilding! COL is keeping an open mind when it comes to trading their 1st round pick(s)...


Avs are keeping an open mind? In what fantasy world do you live in. Sakic has said he is not interested in moving his 1st rounders and prospects.

Sakic said in an interview Feb 5th..“What we’re not doing is moving our high picks or prospects,” Sakic said, just prior to the Avs’ game with Columbus. “Those are just players we are not willing to give up.” Ranger fans seem to make up their own narratives when it comes to trying to get kings ransom for their rentals
11 févr. 2019 à 12 h 36
#11
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: BurgerBoss
1st = 1st
Bowers = prospect

1st+prospect = 2/3 of the rumored assets?

Are you blind?


Quoting: BurgerBoss
Yes. It's rumored that NYR wants a 1st, a top prospect and a prospect for Hayes. Imo they'd be lucky if they get even 2/3 of those.

If they value him that highly, maybe they should be just re-signing him.




Top prospect = NIL - ZERO - No One - The absence of value!

Prospect = Shane Bowers

Pick = Late 1st round pick.

Are you delusional? Are you seeing things that do not exist? That are not real?
11 févr. 2019 à 12 h 50
#12
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,771
Mentions "j'aime": 31,482
Quoting: AJC13
Top prospect = NIL - ZERO - No One - The absence of value!

Prospect = Shane Bowers

Pick = Late 1st round pick.

Are you delusional? Are you seeing things that do not exist? That are not real?


Well I see two of the rumored assets. A prospect and a 1st round pick. That's two out of three. 2/3. Capice?

Besides, who's to say that pick is a late 1st rounder? COL is not currently in the playoff zone.
11 févr. 2019 à 13 h 19
#13
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: coga16
Avs are keeping an open mind? In what fantasy world do you live in. Sakic has said he is not interested in moving his 1st rounders and prospects.

Sakic said in an interview Feb 5th..“What we’re not doing is moving our high picks or prospects,” Sakic said, just prior to the Avs’ game with Columbus. “Those are just players we are not willing to give up.” Ranger fans seem to make up their own narratives when it comes to trying to get kings ransom for their rentals




Unfortunately I must live on the real world and deal with visitors from Fantasy Land like you. Thanks though for listing quotes from Sakic's speech so I could help explain...

When Sakic refers to "high picks", he's referring to lottery picks... He's not referring to 1st round picks that are closer to being 2nd round picks. The draft pick in said proposal is not what Sakic is referring to as "high picks".

Also when Sakic said in said Feb 5th interview that he was not trading his high prospects, he was referring to the prospects rated much higher than Bowers' talents. Again, Bowers was drafted much closer to the 2nd round than he was the lottery.

Or maybe Sakic was just fed up already with how things are completely all around him where ever he goes in COL that he finally said, "I can't trade my HIGH picks and prospects because if I do... None of them will have any hope of fitting in or understanding the natives of Colorado!
11 févr. 2019 à 13 h 43
#14
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Well I see two of the rumored assets. A prospect and a 1st round pick. That's two out of three. 2/3. Capice?

Besides, who's to say that pick is a late 1st rounder? COL is not currently in the playoff zone.


Really? Your now going to try to manipulate the data on me... Do you really think the people on this site are as dumb as those in COL? Do you really believe your own BS? Let me tell you something most on this site know and for some reason you don't...

A top prospect is worth much more value than a prospect like Bowers and late 1st round pick COMBINED. Not 2/3's in the opposite direction your suggesting. When you graduate fifth grade in the USA or in COL graduate high school, you'll know how to better calculate fractions. Until then I would try to avoid being technical around those outside of COL!
11 févr. 2019 à 13 h 47
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: AJC13
Unfortunately I must live on the real world and deal with visitors from Fantasy Land like you. Thanks though for listing quotes from Sakic's speech so I could help explain...

When Sakic refers to "high picks", he's referring to lottery picks... He's not referring to 1st round picks that are closer to being 2nd round picks. The draft pick in said proposal is not what Sakic is referring to as "high picks".

Also when Sakic said in said Feb 5th interview that he was not trading his high prospects, he was referring to the prospects rated much higher than Bowers' talents. Again, Bowers was drafted much closer to the 2nd round than he was the lottery.

Or maybe Sakic was just fed up already with how things are completely all around him where ever he goes in COL that he finally said, "I can't trade my HIGH picks and prospects because if I do... None of them will have any hope of fitting in or understanding the natives of Colorado!


Quoting: AJC13
Unfortunately I must live on the real world and deal with visitors from Fantasy Land like you. Thanks though for listing quotes from Sakic's speech so I could help explain...

When Sakic refers to "high picks", he's referring to lottery picks... He's not referring to 1st round picks that are closer to being 2nd round picks. The draft pick in said proposal is not what Sakic is referring to as "high picks".

Also when Sakic said in said Feb 5th interview that he was not trading his high prospects, he was referring to the prospects rated much higher than Bowers' talents. Again, Bowers was drafted much closer to the 2nd round than he was the lottery.

Or maybe Sakic was just fed up already with how things are completely all around him where ever he goes in COL that he finally said, "I can't trade my HIGH picks and prospects because if I do... None of them will have any hope of fitting in or understanding the natives of Colorado!


Quoting: AJC13
Unfortunately I must live on the real world and deal with visitors from Fantasy Land like you. Thanks though for listing quotes from Sakic's speech so I could help explain...

When Sakic refers to "high picks", he's referring to lottery picks... He's not referring to 1st round picks that are closer to being 2nd round picks. The draft pick in said proposal is not what Sakic is referring to as "high picks".

Also when Sakic said in said Feb 5th interview that he was not trading his high prospects, he was referring to the prospects rated much higher than Bowers' talents. Again, Bowers was drafted much closer to the 2nd round than he was the lottery.

Or maybe Sakic was just fed up already with how things are completely all around him where ever he goes in COL that he finally said, "I can't trade my HIGH picks and prospects because if I do... None of them will have any hope of fitting in or understanding the natives of Colorado!


Holy crap that is one of the most nonsensical pierce of rambling i have ever come across on this site.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
11 févr. 2019 à 13 h 56
#16
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,771
Mentions "j'aime": 31,482
Quoting: AJC13
Really? Your now going to try to manipulate the data on me... Do you really think the people on this site are as dumb as those in COL? Do you really believe your own BS? Let me tell you something most on this site know and for some reason you don't...

A top prospect is worth much more value than a prospect like Bowers and late 1st round pick COMBINED. Not 2/3's in the opposite direction your suggesting. When you graduate fifth grade in the USA or in COL graduate high school, you'll know how to better calculate fractions. Until then I would try to avoid being technical around those outside of COL!


Do you want a medal or something, captain Obvious?

Ofc top prospects have more value.

Take a chill. and log off this site, if it's users don't please you.
11 févr. 2019 à 14 h 9
#17
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: coga16
Holy crap that is one of the most nonsensical pierce of rambling i have ever come across on this site.


Lol! Everything you've ever written on this site is the exact definition of nonsensical ramblings! You are by far the biggest joke on this site. Rangers fans and many from all from around the world constantly laugh at how far from reality you are on every single subject you comment on. And I bid thee a good day!
11 févr. 2019 à 14 h 24
#18
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Do you want a medal or something, captain Obvious?

Ofc top prospects have more value.

Take a chill. and log off this site, if it's users don't please you.


First off... In case you did not know, we are on planet earth. You were commenting like an a$$ on my post and now your telling me to chill - lol! How about next time you decide to make a comment... Instead chill dude!

Second... Expect a good ass beating when your opinions are as far from reality as one could possibly get.

Third... You contribute nothing to this site other than making people who read what you write dumber!
11 févr. 2019 à 15 h 2
#19
Démarrer sujet
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
I will try not list COL on my headlines anymore until after the TDL. I suggest to others to do the same... I dont see anything positive about including COL to a headline for discussion.
11 févr. 2019 à 15 h 2
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: AJC13
Lol! Everything you've ever written on this site is the exact definition of nonsensical ramblings! You are by far the biggest joke on this site. Rangers fans and many from all from around the world constantly laugh at how far from reality you are on every single subject you comment on. And I bid thee a good day!


Ranger fans.....make trades for guys like Makar, Kaut, Timmins, Sens pick. The GM of the Avs says they wont move their TOP PICKS( as in plural) or their Top Prospects. Now who is the delusional one here when actual GMs of Teams, actual NHL insiders and Beat writers provide the context but an over rating their own fan base in the Rangers ignore actual statements.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
11 févr. 2019 à 15 h 11
#21
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,771
Mentions "j'aime": 31,482
Quoting: AJC13
First off... In case you did not know, we are on planet earth. You were commenting like an a$$ on my post and now your telling me to chill - lol! How about next time you decide to make a comment... Instead chill dude!

Second... Expect a good ass beating when your opinions are as far from reality as one could possibly get.

Third... You contribute nothing to this site other than making people who read what you write dumber!


Lmao so I'm dumb because you didn't understand my point.

Whatever floats your boat.

I've been active on this site for about 17 months and you might be one of the biggest trolls I've ever wasted my time with.

And btw, I am not a COL fan. Just because people disagree with you doesn't make one fan base entirely idiotic.
11 févr. 2019 à 17 h 5
#22
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,602
Mentions "j'aime": 1,023
As the other Avs fans said, that trade isnt happening. Middle round pick alone is worth more than Hayes. Winnipeg would be a better target.
CGY trade I could see happening.
TOR is eh, they could maybe use Mcquaid but they arent paying a third for him maybe a fifth/sixth. They dont need tokarski cuz they have Sparks and Hutchinson is in the ahl.
Fast is underrated so NSH might pay that price.
CHI trade is the second biggest oof in this post, Vlad is a supporting player that has struggled...You could probably squeeze a third out of a more serious contending team but to take 2 good prospects from a retooling team? Nah
DAL, maybe? Shatty hasnt been that great the last few years in terms of production.
Nope not taking a prospect from EDM with a third liner and ahler. Maybe youd get Mcleod if you took on Lucic's contract.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage