SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 Way Trade - Colorado

Créé par: DD67
Équipe: 2016-17 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 17 mai 2016
Publié: 17 mai 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know this'll be panned. When's the last time the NHL had a 3 way trade anyway?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
86 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
    2016 2nd round pick
    2.
    COL
    1. Brodie, TJ
    2. Wideman, Dennis
    Détails additionnels:
    2016 3rd round pick
    CGY
    1. Iginla, Jarome
    2. Varlamov, Semyon
    Détails additionnels:
    Barrie, Tyson
    3.
    4.
    COL
      2016 4th round pick
      Enfoui
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2274 000 000 $73 103 496 $0 $1 400 000 $896 504 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 5
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      C
      UFA - 7
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 4
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 3
      2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      800 000 $800 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
      C, AG
      NTC
      UFA - 4
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
      AD, C
      UFA - 3
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance50 000 $$50K)
      C, AD
      UFA - 3
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 4
      1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 4
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 7
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      1 575 000 $1 575 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      G
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      843 333 $843 333 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      17 mai 2016 à 11 h 23
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 19,632
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,765
      I think Colorado isn't giving up enough. Barrie is their best piece but Varlamov is expensive for what he's proven and Iginla is just about finished in the NHL. He might be done after this contract. The Pit and Cgy trades seem pointless also. Basically all of this was done to give Col and Cgy new goalies. If CGY wants Fleury/Varlamov they can just trade for him straight up. No need to trade half their defence core.
      17 mai 2016 à 12 h 12
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 332
      Mentions "j'aime": 13
      Quoting: F50marco
      I think Colorado isn't giving up enough. Barrie is their best piece but Varlamov is expensive for what he's proven and Iginla is just about finished in the NHL. He might be done after this contract. The Pit and Cgy trades seem pointless also. Basically all of this was done to give Col and Cgy new goalies. If CGY wants Fleury/Varlamov they can just trade for him straight up. No need to trade half their defence core.


      I don't think Fleury will waive his NTC to play in Calgary. He might to play for his childhood idol Patrick Roy.

      I think your take that Colorado isn't giving up enough is interesting . Not what I expected to hear at least.
      17 mai 2016 à 12 h 15
      #3
      CL8771
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2016
      Messages: 206
      Mentions "j'aime": 4
      Quoting: F50marco
      I think Colorado isn't giving up enough. Barrie is their best piece but Varlamov is expensive for what he's proven and Iginla is just about finished in the NHL. He might be done after this contract. The Pit and Cgy trades seem pointless also. Basically all of this was done to give Col and Cgy new goalies. If CGY wants Fleury/Varlamov they can just trade for him straight up. No need to trade half their defence core.


      exactly what I thought. Brodie is an underrated dman in the shadow of gio, similarly to the way Gio was in the shadow of bouwmeester and Regehr for a while. Why would Col bother with trading their veteran starter to get a different vet starter? of course three way trades are very complicated, part of the reason why they never happen.
      17 mai 2016 à 12 h 30
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 19,632
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,765
      Quoting: DD67
      Quoting: F50marco
      I think Colorado isn't giving up enough. Barrie is their best piece but Varlamov is expensive for what he's proven and Iginla is just about finished in the NHL. He might be done after this contract. The Pit and Cgy trades seem pointless also. Basically all of this was done to give Col and Cgy new goalies. If CGY wants Fleury/Varlamov they can just trade for him straight up. No need to trade half their defence core.


      I don't think Fleury will waive his NTC to play in Calgary. He might to play for his childhood idol Patrick Roy.

      I think your take that Colorado isn't giving up enough is interesting . Not what I expected to hear at least.


      At the end of the day, its all relative you can think all you want but only Fleury will know where he wants to play so its moot for us to say where or where he will not want to play.

      Dont misunderstand my post though, i'm not saying its a slap in the face trade offer. Just that considering all areas of the trade including the teams cap situation, the players remaining years/Contract, etc, i think Colorado would have to add or even possibly subtract and add a different piece.

      If you take out the worst component of each deal, the trade value becomes clearer:

      Col - Remove Iginla
      Varlamov @ 5.9m for 3 years
      Barrie RFA- est @ 6.25M for 5 years
      2nd round pick
      Total ~12M


      Pitt - Remove Schultz
      Maata @ 4M for 6 years
      Fleury @ 5.75M for 3 years
      Total ~10M


      CGY - Remove Wideman
      Brodie @ 4.65M for 3 years
      Hamilton @ 5.75M for 5 years
      F Hamilton - Worth nothing
      3rd round pick
      Total ~10M


      Too much for CGY to give up IMO. Now that i'm looking at it, Pitts isn't giving enough either. I'd say Pit and Col are closer in value but CGY doesn't need to lose 2 of their best defensemen just to add a goalie. Might as well just add Reimer in free agency.
      17 mai 2016 à 13 h 16
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 332
      Mentions "j'aime": 13
      Quoting: F50marco
      Too much for CGY to give up IMO. Now that i'm looking at it, Pitts isn't giving enough either. I'd say Pit and Col are closer in value but CGY doesn't need to lose 2 of their best defensemen just to add a goalie. Might as well just add Reimer in free agency.


      That's really what I expected to hear. I honestly tried to do too much here, incorporating the Barrie rumors and throwing in Iginla in a sentimental but sensible addition.

      Quoting: F50marco
      Dont misunderstand my post though, i'm not saying its a slap in the face trade offer.


      Never took it that way. All positive thoughts. Thanks for giving them.
      17 mai 2016 à 13 h 24
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 20,030
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
      why would the Avs trade for Bickell? Stuart is probably LTIR with his back, they just gave their division rival free money taking Bickell off their hands.
      Other than that, its pretty interesting trades
      18 mai 2016 à 9 h 29
      #7
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 332
      Mentions "j'aime": 13
      Quoting: coga16
      why would the Avs trade for Bickell? Stuart is probably LTIR with his back, they just gave their division rival free money taking Bickell off their hands.
      Other than that, its pretty interesting trades


      I didn't know that about Stuart. Knowing that I wouldn't have to find a way to dump his salary for a forward.

      Thanks!
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage