SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kap Tanev TDL

Créé par: SP17
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 11 janv. 2019
Publié: 11 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Gives Toronto a very reliable top 4 right hand dman for both this years playoff run and all of next year at only $2.25M cap hit. Type of dman Babcock would probably trust. Also aligns with Dubas' comments stating he would prefer to get a player thats not a pure rental if he makes a trade at the deadline.

As much as I like Kapanen the leafs have plenty of scoring throughout the lineup and he will be difficult to sign with the other players up for contracts this offseason.

Kapanen would fit in nicely with the Canucks top 6 forward group.

The third round pick is because Vancouver retains half of Tanev's salary. (Could vary between a 2nd and a 4th round pick)
Transactions
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher
Détails additionnels:
Vancouver Retains ($2,200,000)
VAN
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2479 500 000 $80 497 778 $2 550 000 $5 400 000 $-997 778 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 277 778 $10 277 778 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
I feel like we'd even add Goldobin to this trade.
SammyT_51 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 28
#2
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
I feel like we'd even add Goldobin to this trade.


So its a done deal?? Please! Tanev would be amazing for Leafs (he is great and moves the puck well) and Kapanen would be Horvat's RW. What if it is one for one Kappy for Tanev?
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 29
#3
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
This is a huge overpay. Tanev has fallen off a cliff and is always injured. I can never understand why people over value him so much.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 31
#4
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: Random2152
This is a huge overpay. Tanev has fallen off a cliff and is always injured. I can never understand why people over value him so much.


He is one of the better shutdown stay at home defenders and moves the puck well. He would be really good in Leafs uniform. Tanev at 2.25? Cmon everybody would take it.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 33
#5
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: SammyT_51
He is one of the better shutdown stay at home defenders and moves the puck well. He would be really good in Leafs uniform. Tanev at 2.25? Cmon everybody would take it.


dude. his ADV stats have fallen of a cliff, as have his normal stats. He cant skate, shut down lines, move the puck or anything any more. That and he is always injured. You aren't getting the player you think they are.
Here: https://theathletic.com/714351/2018/12/14/chris-tanevs-rapidly-declining-play-introduces-another-asset-management-dilemma-for-canucks/
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: SammyT_51
So its a done deal?? Please! Tanev would be amazing for Leafs (he is great and moves the puck well) and Kapanen would be Horvat's RW. What if it is one for one Kappy for Tanev?


I think one for one Tavenv for Kapanen is fair but if Vancouver is going to retain salary which would benefit the leafs greatly I think they would want to get a pick in return.

If they added Goldobin they would probably want at least another pick. Probably better off moving Goldobin in a seperate deal as I think the leafs would also prefer a more defensively reliable or energy forward for the playoffs.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 38
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Random2152
This is a huge overpay. Tanev has fallen off a cliff and is always injured. I can never understand why people over value him so much.


I disagree that it is a huge overpay but I think you could get Tanev for a different package. Throw a 2nd and Bracco and I think the Canucks would still retain half the salary. As for your statement of Tanev falling off a cliff, that is entirely not true, he's about as consistent as they come. Yeah he gets banged up from time to time but that happens to physical shut down guys at times. He's not had many repeat injuries which is generally the sign of a injury prone guy. Like when Gaborik missed time every year because of a sports hernia issue.
SP17 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 39
#8
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: LoganOllivier
I disagree that it is a huge overpay but I think you could get Tanev for a different package. Throw a 2nd and Bracco and I think the Canucks would still retain half the salary. As for your statement of Tanev falling off a cliff, that is entirely not true, he's about as consistent as they come. Yeah he gets banged up from time to time but that happens to physical shut down guys at times. He's not had many repeat injuries which is generally the sign of a injury prone guy. Like when Gaborik missed time every year because of a sports hernia issue.


Look at the stats. He cannot prevent shots anymore, which is the #1 reason the Leafs would want him. He HAS fallen off a cliff. GMs have recognized this. Izerman offered dotchin for Tanev 1-for-1, the Leafs offered a similar package. He is worth nothing
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 39
#9
SeminStains
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 91
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: Random2152
This is a huge overpay. Tanev has fallen off a cliff and is always injured. I can never understand why people over value him so much.


This. Why trade for a player who is injury prone; we've run into this before with players like Lupul and Robidas ect...why continue down this path.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 39
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Random2152
dude. his ADV stats have fallen of a cliff, as have his normal stats. He cant skate, shut down lines, move the puck or anything any more. That and he is always injured. You aren't getting the player you think they are.
Here: https://theathletic.com/714351/2018/12/14/chris-tanevs-rapidly-declining-play-introduces-another-asset-management-dilemma-for-canucks/


Athletic doesn't really understand the whole picture. They use advanced stats in a team game to single out players who are falling victim to a terrible team. Vancouver sucks defensively, that'll hurt anyones advance stats.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 41
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: Random2152
dude. his ADV stats have fallen of a cliff, as have his normal stats. He cant skate, shut down lines, move the puck or anything any more. That and he is always injured. You aren't getting the player you think they are.
Here: https://theathletic.com/714351/2018/12/14/chris-tanevs-rapidly-declining-play-introduces-another-asset-management-dilemma-for-canucks/


He definitely has struggled at times this year but his recent play has been much better. It's only a 2 year commitment at $2.25M and if he is healthy he can eat up valuable minutes in the playoffs especially. The leafs will not win with Hainesy and Zaitsev having to eat the minutes on the right side all playoffs. Perhaps playing with more skilled players and a stronger system benefits Tanev in transition and breakouts. Dmen do not come cheap and as nice as it would be to get someone like Pesce from Carolina the price will be substantially higher.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 46
#12
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Athletic doesn't really understand the whole picture. They use advanced stats in a team game to single out players who are falling victim to a terrible team. Vancouver sucks defensively, that'll hurt anyones advance stats.


He was fine on bad van teams before. This year and the end of last he was starting to fall, this year he has totally fallen off. Read the damn thing before you say they don't know what they are talking about.
Also ADV stats normalize to account for individual contributions.
11 janv. 2019 à 13 h 48
#13
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: SP1994
He definitely has struggled at times this year but his recent play has been much better. It's only a 2 year commitment at $2.25M and if he is healthy he can eat up valuable minutes in the playoffs especially. The leafs will not win with Hainesy and Zaitsev having to eat the minutes on the right side all playoffs. Perhaps playing with more skilled players and a stronger system benefits Tanev in transition and breakouts. Dmen do not come cheap and as nice as it would be to get someone like Pesce from Carolina the price will be substantially higher.


I'd be fine getting Tanev.
Not for anything near this value.
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 1
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
I
Quoting: Random2152
I'd be fine getting Tanev.
Not for anything near this value.


Top pairing right hand defensemen are not cheap. Why would Vancouver trade him if it was anything less than this?
SP17 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 9
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Quoting: LoganOllivier
I disagree that it is a huge overpay but I think you could get Tanev for a different package. Throw a 2nd and Bracco and I think the Canucks would still retain half the salary. As for your statement of Tanev falling off a cliff, that is entirely not true, he's about as consistent as they come. Yeah he gets banged up from time to time but that happens to physical shut down guys at times. He's not had many repeat injuries which is generally the sign of a injury prone guy. Like when Gaborik missed time every year because of a sports hernia issue.


If its going to be Bracco + then you need to make that pick a 1st for retention. Kap is a Proven NHLer something the canucks need, not another AHL guy.
SP17 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 10
#16
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: sedin33
I

Top pairing right hand defensemen are not cheap. Why would Vancouver trade him if it was anything less than this?


He is not a top pair guy anymore. Yzerman offered dotchin for Tanev 1 for 1 and the leafs offered a similar deal. No one thinks he has any value.

Why?

His stats have fallen. Both normal and adv. He is not the player people think he is anymore. He can't skate, is always injured, can't suppress shots, can't stop entries, can't exit etc.
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 21
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: Random2152
He is not a top pair guy anymore. Yzerman offered dotchin for Tanev 1 for 1 and the leafs offered a similar deal. No one thinks he has any value.

Why?

His stats have fallen. Both normal and adv. He is not the player people think he is anymore. He can't skate, is always injured, can't suppress shots, can't stop entries, can't exit etc.


Would you take it if we added Goldobin?
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 22
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: SammyT_51
So its a done deal?? Please! Tanev would be amazing for Leafs (he is great and moves the puck well) and Kapanen would be Horvat's RW. What if it is one for one Kappy for Tanev?


Absolutely. There's no way that the Canucks turn that down. In fact, if you send us Zaitsev, Kapanen, and a lower pick we'd take it.
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 40
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Random2152
Look at the stats. He cannot prevent shots anymore, which is the #1 reason the Leafs would want him. He HAS fallen off a cliff. GMs have recognized this. Izerman offered dotchin for Tanev 1-for-1, the Leafs offered a similar package. He is worth nothing


Vancouver can't prevent shots, that isn't something one guy can change. Preventing shots is a team swarming in the defensive zone thing. It isn't one player makes it impossible for people to shoot. And shots against as a metric in determining defensive prowess is just wrong. All shots are not equal, otherwise TO wouldn't be in the top 5 in goals against.
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 42
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: playercoachreggiedunlop
If its going to be Bracco + then you need to make that pick a 1st for retention. Kap is a Proven NHLer something the canucks need, not another AHL guy.


If that is the case I'd happily keep Bracco and use him next season and make the trade Kapanen for Tanev at half value.
GMBB et SP17 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2019 à 14 h 57
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Quoting: Random2152
He is not a top pair guy anymore. Yzerman offered dotchin for Tanev 1 for 1 and the leafs offered a similar deal. No one thinks he has any value.

Why?

His stats have fallen. Both normal and adv. He is not the player people think he is anymore. He can't skate, is always injured, can't suppress shots, can't stop entries, can't exit etc.


He is a top pairing RHD for Vancouver. Vancouver also didn't accept those deals. He obviously has value for Vancouver. So once again, why would Vancouver trade THEIR top pairing RHD for anything less?

You make it seem like these guys grow on trees.
SP17 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2019 à 15 h 5
#22
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
Would you take it if we added Goldobin?


Don't know enough about him to really say, so I'll just stick with what I know and keep Kappy.
11 janv. 2019 à 15 h 6
#23
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Vancouver can't prevent shots, that isn't something one guy can change. Preventing shots is a team swarming in the defensive zone thing. It isn't one player makes it impossible for people to shoot. And shots against as a metric in determining defensive prowess is just wrong. All shots are not equal, otherwise TO wouldn't be in the top 5 in goals against.


Shot suppression is an adv stat that normalizes to isolate an individual players contribution towards shot suppression. Tanev cannot suppress shots as well as last year, which was a huge fall off from the rest of his career on its own.
11 janv. 2019 à 15 h 8
#24
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,368
Mentions "j'aime": 5,688
Quoting: sedin33
He is a top pairing RHD for Vancouver. Vancouver also didn't accept those deals. He obviously has value for Vancouver. So once again, why would Vancouver trade THEIR top pairing RHD for anything less?

You make it seem like these guys grow on trees.


I think the fact that other GM's think he is worth nothing is why Benning re-signed him instead of trading last year. There are players around the league who are more valuable on their team then their trade value would bring back, so they aren't moved. You are right that van would not want to trade him for what is offered, problem is they won't get many offers that are much better than those offers. So he will die a Canuck.
11 janv. 2019 à 15 h 9
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: LoganOllivier
If that is the case I'd happily keep Bracco and use him next season and make the trade Kapanen for Tanev at half value.


Good chance the leafs would rather keep Bracco if they think he will be NHL ready next year too just for salary cap reasons. Not that they wouldn't love to keep Kapanen
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage