SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who wants Bickell

Créé par: Alankrz
Équipe: 2016-17 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 16 mai 2016
Publié: 16 mai 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Getting Bickell off the books allows Hawks to keep Ladd and have a solid top 6. I've added Panarin's bonuses and was very conservative with what the Hawks would get back in a package trade that includes Bickell and rights to Shaw. Hartman needs to be the new Shaw (or Baun or Hinostroza). Hawks get a #4 defenseman either in the trade or on the free agent market.

Due to Panarin's bonus there's only about 1,000,000 available to use on the defense in this scenario, which should get Ben Lovejoy.

I still think the Hawks could keep Ladd for 4.5 million cap hit. Bowman can give him a front loaded contract for 6 years so Ladd can get his pay day. That presents problems for resigning Panarin's and Teavo next year, but cross that bridge when we get there.

The Hawks don't like to rush their prospects into the NHL so I don't expect to see Motte or Smaltz (if he's signed) or Forsling. Maybe Polka, we'll see.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Bonus, Panarin
12 575 000 $
11 000 000 $
64 500 000 $
Transactions
CHI
    2016 4th round pick
    NJD
    1. Bickell, Bryan
    2. Rundblad, David
    Détails additionnels:
    Rights to RFA Andrew Shaw
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2274 000 000 $68 431 587 $3 070 000 $3 940 000 $5 568 413 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Ladd, Andrew
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 7
    Toews, Jonathan
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Pánik, Richard
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Panarin, Artemi
    812 500 $812 500 $ (Bonis de performance2 575 000 $$3M)
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Anisimov, Artem
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Kane, Patrick
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Teräväinen, Teuvo
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Krüger, Marcus
    2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Hossa, Marián
    5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Desjardins, Andrew
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Hartman, Ryan
    863 333 $863 333 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Bonus, Panarin
    2 575 000 $2 575 000 $
    Hinostroza, Vinnie
    717 500 $717 500 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Keith, Duncan
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Seabrook, Brent
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Crawford, Corey
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    Hjalmarsson, Niklas
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Darling, Scott
    587 500 $587 500 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Lovejoy, Ben
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    van Riemsdyk, Trevor
    825 000 $825 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Svedberg, Viktor
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Gustafsson, Erik
    667 500 $667 500 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    What needs to be package with Bickell to interest a trade partner?
    Le graphique a été masqué

    Options de sondage


    16 mai 2016 à 7 h 40
    #1
    Bruins_Guy613
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 689
    Mentions "j'aime": 54
    Not likely getting Shaw on a 1 year deal for 4.5 considering he was asking 6X6 from Winnipeg a couple months ago.
    Alankrz a aimé ceci.
    16 mai 2016 à 8 h 34
    #2
    palhal
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 60,286
    Mentions "j'aime": 23,123
    The Hawks would be better off just signing Shaw and not resign Ladd.
    16 mai 2016 à 10 h 8
    #3
    Alankrz
    Démarrer sujet
    Big D's #1 Hawks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 124
    Mentions "j'aime": 20
    Good to know about what the market is for Ladd. I didn't think he'd get up to 6,000,000 per year. Any thoughts on the likelihood of a trade involving Bickell?
    16 mai 2016 à 11 h 12
    #4
    CL8771
    CL8771
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 206
    Mentions "j'aime": 4
    Quoting: Alankrz
    Good to know about what the market is for Ladd. I didn't think he'd get up to 6,000,000 per year. Any thoughts on the likelihood of a trade involving Bickell?


    bickell brings down the value the hawks send in a trade so something like, shaw, bickell for a mid round pick(3rd maybe?)
    16 mai 2016 à 11 h 53
    #5
    graderman
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 1,729
    Mentions "j'aime": 288
    Well, Bryan Bickell was waived twice last season I believe, with no takers. This season he is due to make $4.5M along with his cap hit of $4.0M in, at last, his final season with Chicago. Good riddance!! Unfortunately, he will be on the Hawks' books for $1M this season and $1.5M next year when he is bought out. While us fans couldn't be more thrilled with Panarin, his bonuses (as well as other overages) will be more than $3M in additional cap hits. With next to no money to spend and Quenneville's boy toy Shaw still needing at least $3M, I simply do not see how Bowman works it this time around without another "big" moving on. That's reality, folks!
    16 mai 2016 à 22 h 42
    #6
    Alankrz
    Démarrer sujet
    Big D's #1 Hawks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 124
    Mentions "j'aime": 20
    Quoting: Burnsy613
    Not likely getting Shaw on a 1 year deal for 4.5 considering he was asking 6X6 from Winnipeg a couple months ago.
    I made some updates based on your comments about Ladd. 4.5 million on a US team gets more money to Ladd than it would in Canada due to higher taxes in Canada. I did make it a 6 year contract.
    16 mai 2016 à 23 h 2
    #7
    Alankrz
    Démarrer sujet
    Big D's #1 Hawks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 124
    Mentions "j'aime": 20
    Quoting: graderman
    Well, Bryan Bickell was waived twice last season I believe, with no takers. This season he is due to make $4.5M along with his cap hit of $4.0M in, at last, his final season with Chicago. Good riddance!! Unfortunately, he will be on the Hawks' books for $1M this season and $1.5M next year when he is bought out. While us fans couldn't be more thrilled with Panarin, his bonuses (as well as other overages) will be more than $3M in additional cap hits. With next to no money to spend and Quenneville's boy toy Shaw still needing at least $3M, I simply do not see how Bowman works it this time around without another "big" moving on. That's reality, folks!
    good riddance is right about almost being done with Bickell. But I am optimistic that packaging Bickell with another asset, which was not possible during the season when the Hawks were in "win now" mode, will have a market. A buyout wouldn't be a good option because it would make less cap space available next year when Panarin and Teavo need new contracts. Maybe the Hawks will retain a portion of Bickell's cap hit in a trade to get the deal done. Any thoughts on a packaging Bickell with Teavo in a trade?
    17 mai 2016 à 1 h 33
    #8
    F50marco
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,638
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    In reality, Chicago has to just let time take its course. Once Bickell and Rundblad are off the books not by buyout but by just letting their contracts finish, then they might be able to salvage the rest of the team. Trading them will be hard but if a team takes them then by all means thats gravy. Just don't see it happening.
    Alankrz a aimé ceci.
    18 mai 2016 à 14 h 27
    #9
    Alankrz
    Démarrer sujet
    Big D's #1 Hawks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 124
    Mentions "j'aime": 20
    I agree 100% with not buying out Bickell. We all know Stan is not going to give up on a trade that includes Bickell so let's see some more ideas.
    18 mai 2016 à 14 h 48
    #10
    F50marco
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,638
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    Easiest solution? Trade Bickell with 50% retained and a high draft pick. Possibly a 2nd rounder. Means keeping the team you have above minus Ladd and Lovejoy and keeping Shaw. The real problem though is the following year.
    Alankrz a aimé ceci.
    18 mai 2016 à 17 h 2
    #11
    graderman
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 1,729
    Mentions "j'aime": 288
    "The Hawks don't like to rush their prospects into the NHL..." You are right, they DO like to trade them, tho!
    18 mai 2016 à 19 h 31
    #12
    Alankrz
    Démarrer sujet
    Big D's #1 Hawks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 124
    Mentions "j'aime": 20
    Quoting: graderman
    "The Hawks don't like to rush their prospects into the NHL..." You are right, they DO like to trade them, tho!
    True story.
    20 mai 2016 à 11 h 28
    #13
    Alankrz
    Démarrer sujet
    Big D's #1 Hawks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 124
    Mentions "j'aime": 20
    Any thoughts on including Motte in a Bickell trade? He's young and his value is rising. Can't wait to see US vs CAN this Saturday for the IIHF World Championships.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Chargement de l'animation
    Soumettre les modifications du sondage