Quoting: Campa96
Is it really something that someone in the organization has said or are Ducks fans trying to speak it into existence?
Pointless remark. I mean, if you want to play it like that, has anyone in the ANA organisation even acknowledged interest in Patches? Or even stated that top prospects are available? The burden of proof is on you to prove that GMBM is even entertaining the idea of moving not 1, but 2 top prospects + a 1st (that is currently a lottery pick) for Patches, not on us to disprove it.
In defence of us “Duck fans”, the belief that “we” have that Steel isn’t available is founded on sound logic based on GMBM’s track-record (he’s never moved a top prospects for a player, let alone 2), we actually need Steel to replace Getzlaf eventually i.e. he’s not an expendable asset, we have other issues to address (namely Bieksa), and the fact that we’re not in a playoff position to even exploit the addition of Patches. Sorry to bring your fantasy crashing down, but this is the reality of the situation.
Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
I heard from a buddy who knows someone that said this exact trade is apparently in the works.
This is the exact type of return I would expect for a player like pacioretty. Just imagine a playmaker like getzlaf with a shooter like pacioretty.
“A buddy who knows someone” = not a legitimate source. The use of the word “apparently” = an assertion based on little/no evidence.
Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
Pacioretty doesn't get traded for less than this. Steel is a 20 yr old still playing junior, pacioretty is an Elite goal scorer.
Fine, you keep him. Steel isn’t available and we are not even in a playoff spot to need him.
Quoting: Blazingbat11
I think this is the crossroad we are at. I honestly think that what we Habs fans are asking in return is a high price, but that it might actually be less than what Bergefail is really asking for for Patches.
But also, other fans are justified that they don’t want to give up their best prospects for what would realistically be 1 1/2 seasons and 2 playoff pushes of Pacioretty.
So this is precisely why Pacioretty hasn’t been traded yet, and probably won’t be unless someone is willing to give up their best prospects. And it makes sense, Patches is still signed next year. Bergefail is in no rush to settle on a lesser deal.
You, my friend, get it. If this is the price of Patches, I have a hard time seeing Patches moved. Personally, I don’t think MTL is that committed to the rebuild (probably more of a retool). If I have misjudged that and they are, then Patches will he moved at the TDL, but for either a similar package not containing a top C prospect or just a lesser package.