SalarySwishSalarySwish

Whoever scores more Michigan goals wins the trade

Créé par: F50marco
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 15 janv. 2024
Publié: 15 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $59 038 750 $0 $9 075 000 $24 461 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance550 000 $$550K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

15 janv. à 14 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,205
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
I’d rather have kent than zegras
CaseyFlyman et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 16 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,773
Mentions "j'aime": 1,807
Quoting: SK101
I’d rather have kent than zegras


You prefer 57 points in 115 games (.49/g) to 146 pts in 200 (.73/g)? Z almost has more goals than Kent has points. Very curious about this pov
15 janv. à 16 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,112
Mentions "j'aime": 1,793
Quoting: Jded
You prefer 57 points in 115 games (.49/g) to 146 pts in 200 (.73/g)? Z almost has more goals than Kent has points. Very curious about this pov


KJ is a full year younger and has only played 1.5 NHL seasons. Zegras is essentially a 3.5 year vet. It's too early to compare NHL point totals.

Zegras is a great player, I'd love to see CBJ trade for him if he's available, but the regression and injuries are concerning. Their ceilings should be about the same (PPG to 100+ points?) but it's just too early to swap them IMO.
15 janv. à 16 h 33
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,205
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Jded
You prefer 57 points in 115 games (.49/g) to 146 pts in 200 (.73/g)? Z almost has more goals than Kent has points. Very curious about this pov


Just a preference. Zegras is better right now but if you look at points per 60 the numbers are very similar. Zegras has been playing top line minutes almost his whole career. They are both very similar players but I’m hoping the jackets will lock down Kent long term on a better contract than what zegras has
15 janv. à 17 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,773
Mentions "j'aime": 1,807
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
KJ is a full year younger and has only played 1.5 NHL seasons. Zegras is essentially a 3.5 year vet. It's too early to compare NHL point totals.

Zegras is a great player, I'd love to see CBJ trade for him if he's available, but the regression and injuries are concerning. Their ceilings should be about the same (PPG to 100+ points?) but it's just too early to swap them IMO.


I guess that’s my point. 1 year or so apart isnt much. Comparing their points at the same level of experience, Z had 74pts in his first 1.5 seasons across 99 games. It’s totally too early to definitively say anything, but sample sizes over 100 games aren’t nothing, and they pretty clearly favor Z so I guess I was just surprised that someone would defijitively prefer KJ straight up.

As for injuries, Z played 156 of 164 games across the last 2 years. Injuries hit everyone sometimes, but his history is not one suggesting he’s an injury prone player

If you’ve watched him this year his play doesn’t suggest regression. Pts over the 20 game sample do, but not his on-ice play. If anything his 200ft game has made huge improvements.

To each their own I guess!
Voir tout