SalarySwishSalarySwish

What this team could look like

Créé par: ChiHawk
Équipe: 2025-26 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 26 oct. 2023
Publié: 26 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Hawks are going to have their core ready for the 2025/2026 to start competing; maybe a last entry into the playoffs but in 2026/2027 look out. This is just a best guess at this point...obviously other prospects are in the system.

The Hawks have a real shot at either Celebrini or Eiserman this year and I do think Levshunov is in the mix of the top 3, potentially taken #2 but Hawks should pass as they need top 6 more immediately. With all the extra draft capital in the 2023 draft (late 1st, 3 2nds and 2 3rds) I do expect them to select a couple of RHD guys preparing for Murphy eventually being gone and Seth Jones declining. I'm high on Sam Rinzel though, and think he could be 2nd liner.

I do think they make a big splash to round out the top 6 either next summer or the following summer and RW is a gap. There are several RW guys at this point available over the next two free agent periods.

There are several more prospects that could make a run for the team, but at this point this is my best projection.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 100 000 $
31 100 000 $
32 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
34 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
79 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3950 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2487 500 000 $55 777 500 $0 $4 925 000 $31 722 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 1
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Celebrini, Macklin
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
896 667 $896 667 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
931 667 $931 667 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 oct. 2023 à 4 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Really need to get Reichel over to the wing as you've shown here. I like Rinzel too, think he will take another season after this at least before he joins, maybe even another after that depending. Im also quite high on Vlasic.
exo2769, Garak, RicXX and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
26 oct. 2023 à 8 h 8
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,692
Mentions "j'aime": 9,842
I'm not convinced Top 6 is a bigger area of concern vs RD though. And I really don't like the "more immediate" thing there. (No offense, sorry if perceived that way) The build will take as long as it takes. If you have a top 3 pick, make sure you draft best available. I feel for Dach because he can't stay healthy which sucks, but that wasn't exactly a hit. We don't have a #1 RD. Levshunov looks like he's that guy. I'd actually argue the opposite to you, a #1 RD (IF that's what Levshunov turns out to be) is more important than a top 6 forward. You can find top 6 forwards in the NHL...#1 RD you won't find in the UFA market. They're locked up.

Oh, and I'd try to get as many picks as possible at the TDL and move up in the draft. Let's say you have (4) 2nd rounders. Per sound of hockey, of you take the average 2nd and multiply by 4...just because we don't know where they land yet...you can get a #13OA pick. I'd 100% do that if we had a taker. We need high end talent more that more picks imo.
Garak et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
26 oct. 2023 à 8 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,902
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: exo2769
I'm not convinced Top 6 is a bigger area of concern vs RD though. And I really don't like the "more immediate" thing there. (No offense, sorry if perceived that way) The build will take as long as it takes. If you have a top 3 pick, make sure you draft best available. I feel for Dach because he can't stay healthy which sucks, but that wasn't exactly a hit. We don't have a #1 RD. Levshunov looks like he's that guy. I'd actually argue the opposite to you, a #1 RD (IF that's what Levshunov turns out to be) is more important than a top 6 forward. You can find top 6 forwards in the NHL...#1 RD you won't find in the UFA market. They're locked up.

Oh, and I'd try to get as many picks as possible at the TDL and move up in the draft. Let's say you have (4) 2nd rounders. Per sound of hockey, of you take the average 2nd and multiply by 4...just because we don't know where they land yet...you can get a #13OA pick. I'd 100% do that if we had a taker. We need high end talent more that more picks imo.


I am definitely convinced top 6 is more important than RD. We have Jones for 7 more years, Murphy for 3 more, Rinzel is looking like he won't take as long as originally predicted, and Kelley is having a decent year. Some positions could always be addressed through free agency or trades, if/when it becomes necessary, and RD kind of fits the bill for that. Most of what have right now for forwards seem like 2nd liners tops. We need another BIG talent to play with Bedard on the top line, IMO. Someone who can think the game the way and speed he does. But, we'll see. I do certainly want to add RHD to our pool. But I don't think we need to use a top pick on an RHD right now. I'd strongly consider guys like Mews, Elick, Cristoforo, etc. with that TBL pick or in the early 2nd round, depending where the rankings end up and the picks land.

Side note: VAN has an absolute WEALTH of RHD out of the 2023 draft. Bruzcewicz, Willander, and A. Celebrini are ALL hitting for them. If we can figure out a way to steal one of them away, that would also help our RHD pool.
exo2769, RicXX et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
26 oct. 2023 à 8 h 43
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,692
Mentions "j'aime": 9,842
Quoting: Garak
I am definitely convinced top 6 is more important than RD. We have Jones for 7 more years, Murphy for 3 more, Rinzel is looking like he won't take as long as originally predicted, and Kelley is having a decent year. Some positions could always be addressed through free agency or trades, if/when it becomes necessary, and RD kind of fits the bill for that. Most of what have right now for forwards seem like 2nd liners tops. We need another BIG talent to play with Bedard on the top line, IMO. Someone who can think the game the way and speed he does. But, we'll see. I do certainly want to add RHD to our pool. But I don't think we need to use a top pick on an RHD right now. I'd strongly consider guys like Mews, Elick, Cristoforo, etc. with that TBL pick or in the early 2nd round, depending where the rankings end up and the picks land.

Side note: VAN has an absolute WEALTH of RHD out of the 2023 draft. Bruzcewicz, Willander, and A. Celebrini are ALL hitting for them. If we can figure out a way to steal one of them away, that would also help our RHD pool.


So you don't think Moore/Nazar/Reichel can play a top 6 role? If we're on the same page that Rinzel can be a 2nd pair guy...and at least I do believe so far he can do that....and...that Seth Jones is getting older. We don't have a #1 RD in 4 years. Is 34 Seth Jones a #1 RD? I just see that as a bigger need. I'm not saying if you get the #1 OA that you force yourself to Levshunov. You draft best available, but I don't see Demidov as a better choice than Levshunov.
RicXX, SociallyHawkward, Garak and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
26 oct. 2023 à 9 h 16
#5
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,308
Mentions "j'aime": 4,485
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Really need to get Reichel over to the wing as you've shown here. I like Rinzel too, think he will take another season after this at least before he joins, maybe even another after that depending. Im also quite high on Vlasic.


I agree, the Reichel at center experiment has been a complete disaster, it’s time to move him back to the wing

And honestly I knew that experiment wasn’t going to work, he didn’t play center when he was called up last year so I thought it was quite a bad decision
RicXX, ChiHawk et Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
Voir tout