SalarySwishSalarySwish

Stop Hextalling and make a move

Créé par: Mr_Gardoki
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 9 févr. 2023
Publié: 9 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
STL
  1. Hållander, Filip
  2. McGinn, Brock
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
2.
PIT
  1. Henrique, Adam (1 825 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Smith, Ty
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Heinen, Danton
Détails additionnels:
ANY PLAYOFF TEAM LOOKING FOR DEPTH
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $72 691 842 $0 $0 $9 808 158 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
-368 750 $-368 750 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

9 févr. 2023 à 23 h 38
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 7,046
A retained Henrique requires a 1st. I normally say a 2nd and a blue chip prospect would also work, but having perused the Pens farm system I don't see a suitable piece at a position of need.
9 févr. 2023 à 23 h 42
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,662
Mentions "j'aime": 11,480
The Blues are not taking McGinn, dude.
9 févr. 2023 à 23 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 967
Mentions "j'aime": 391
You have the more level headed ACGMs on here compared to most Pens fans. Everytime I get on here and create a new ACGM to play around with, the glaring need always comes down to the bottom-six/3C which is what you've done here 👍.

Dumoulin seems to be coming around to a more competent level of play and you can't discount his familiarity with Letang. This has been DeSmith's worst season as the back up, but it looks like he responded to management's recent criticism (W vs. Colorado) and he always has stronger play this time of year. With only so much wiggle room, this is why I think Hextall has to prioritize 3C rather than a top-four LHD or back up goaltender.

Henrique, O'Reilly and Acciari and the names that always pop in my head (which isn't much) think Carolina is going to go after O'Reilly with their LTIR cap space. I'm curious, have there been any other 3C options that come to mind for you besides the ones I mentioned?
Mr_Gardoki a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 23 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 967
Mentions "j'aime": 391
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
A retained Henrique requires a 1st. I normally say a 2nd and a blue chip prospect would also work, but having perused the Pens farm system I don't see a suitable piece at a position of need.


What if Anaheim only retains between 8-18% of Henrique's contract? I'm not so sure that automatically warrants a 1st round pick now like 40-50% would.
10 févr. 2023 à 0 h 22
#5
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 7,046
Modifié 10 févr. 2023 à 0 h 59
Quoting: Play_Party_Hard
What if Anaheim only retains between 8-18% of Henrique's contract? I'm not so sure that automatically warrants a 1st round pick now like 40-50% would.


It really depends on what the other pieces are. There's a minimum cost involved in both occupying a retention slot for this and next year, as well as shipping out our leading goal scorer. Failing to meet that threshold and Rico is more valuable to keep around until next TDL and look at moving him then.

While a lot of the "it's a 1st or a non starter" position is from assumed heavy retention, he is one of our most valuable trade pieces (factoring in this year and next years pending UFAs). While he would be your 3c, he's our 1LW, and not being a pending UFA, were under no pressure to move him, so the offer has to be enough to convince us to let him go, as opposed to "it's the best we can get, and we have to move him"

The situation Anaheim is in is that we are critically short at LW, specifically with top 6 capability. Moving Rico early means we have to patch that hole next season at 1LW, and the UFA market for LW is crap (Bunting and Kerfoot are in the top 5 avaliable, fine players, but not replacing Rico)

So if you are Anaheim, you need either a top 6 potential prospect at LW coming back, or most/all of the pieces to go and get that player, otherwise it's more valuable to us to hang onto Rico, especially since his cap hit is of no concern to us through the end of his contract.
Voir tout