Not sure how else they can squeeze

Créé par: Gronk
Date de création initiale: 6 oct. 2022
Publié: 6 oct. 2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Droitier
Position
Clause de non-échange/non-mouvement
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
McDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 2023 ronde en 5e (FLA)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGE1E RONDE2E RONDE3E RONDE4E RONDE5E RONDE6E RONDE7E RONDE
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $81 927 283 $212 500 $0 $572 717 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Bunting, Michael
950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Matthews, Auston
11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Marner, Mitchell
10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Robertson, Nicholas
796 667 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Tavares, John
11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Nylander, William
6 962 366 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Kerfoot, Alexander
3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Järnkrok, Calle
2 100 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Engvall, Pierre
2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Simmonds, Wayne
900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Kämpf, David
1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Aubé-Kubel, Nicolas
1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Rielly, Morgan
7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Brodie, TJ
5 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Murray, Matt
4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Muzzin, Jake
5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Sandin, Rasmus
1 400 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Samsonov, Ilya
1 800 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Giordano, Mark
800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Liljegren, Timothy
1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Nylander, W.
Tavares, J.
Matthews, A.
Rielly, M.
Marner, M.
Avantage numérique 2
Robertson, N.
Järnkrok, C.
Bunting, M.
Sandin, R.
Kerfoot, A.
Infériorité numérique 1
Kämpf, D.
Kerfoot, A.
Muzzin, J.
Brodie, T.
Infériorité numérique 2
Järnkrok, C.
Marner, M.
Giordano, M.
Liljegren, T.

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 235
it has to be engvall or Kerfoot i think, as much as i dont like holl he just doenst give you enough space really and Keef loves him to much also. that is why we gave up McCann in the expansion draft.
6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 20
#2
all in
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,728
Mentions "j'aime": 607
holl looks way faster this year too, he"ll be a big part of our blue line, we need him more than kerfoot imo.
palhal a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,454
Mentions "j'aime": 432
It's going to be ZAR, not Simmonds
6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 4,378
Mentions "j'aime": 1,443
Engvall or Holl dont allow you to have 19 skaters, even though hes the best of the lot, Kerfoot has to go, or the team will struggle to ice a team (or overplay their top 7 players constantly).

Leafs arent hurting for offense, never do, but the age on defense or over-reliance on Sandin/iljegren who have never played top 4 minutes or 70+ games, makes Holl more important than Kerfoot.
palhal a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 12 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 3,914
Mentions "j'aime": 1,550
Quoting: python3504
it has to be engvall or Kerfoot i think, as much as i dont like holl he just doenst give you enough space really and Keef loves him to much also. that is why we gave up McCann in the expansion draft.


I agree.

For the last couple seasons, NHL caliber blueline depth has been an issue with the Leafs, and now having 7, there is a knee jerk reaction to move one of them to get under cap. Holl isn't a big flashy name, but is economical and efficient in his game, and just underrated. Sure, there are better out there, but there are worse. Moving Holl will simply recreate a wheel where you Dubas will be hunting for D depthbat the deadline..... just like last year.

Which brings us to Kerfoot or Engvall.

Kerfoot is completely versatile, plays 200 feet, and can play centre - which seems to matter. Now, I am not sure if we get the 2021-22 Kerfoot this year, but his sample size is large enough to suggest he is a defensively reliable and good for 40 points.

Engvall is a bit more of an enigma - a player who has the size to play a heavy game (but really doesn't), his transition game is fantastic, skates well, and defends well, and plays centre in a pinch. What he can do offensively is anyone's guess. Did he catch lightening in a bottle last year, or has he finally found his game?

Overall, I move Kerfoot, and here is why.

1. He is a Swiss Army knife in the line up, and Dubas signed a second one in Järnkrok. He too can play up the line up and play centre. And just like Kerfoot, better on the wing.

2. Kerfoot has priced himself out of Toronto, guaranteed. Engvall at this point maybe has not. If he repeats his season from last year, there maybe a similar contract in line. Retaining Engvall is more likely than retaining Kerfoot.

3. Kerfoot nets a better return. We know Kerfoot is worth a 2nd, and we know we won't get that. Engvall on the market maybe nets a 3rd under equal, non cap related circumstances. The cap pinch drives that price down. Knowing a move has to be made, I would move the player that will garner the best asset possible.

4. The sudden emergence of Malgin and the somewhat expected showing of Robertson...... neither player is someone I would exactly want in my bottom 6. But, in the top 6 could thrive - and we have seen evidence of that.neither player ar this stage has the defensive capabilities of Kerfoot, but certainly the offense is there. Leafs fans have seen Roberston in a more limited role, and the results have been luke warm. Going back a couple.years, we can say the same for Malgin. Imo, neither player is really suited to replace Engvall in the bottom 6, (and ZAR is a great 4th line option if someone thinks he is it). But, to replace Kerfoot in the top 6? Yeah..... I could see it.

Certainly not the easiest decision to male here folks, but long.term, thinking through the process, it's Kerfoot.
Voir tout