SalarySwishSalarySwish

Ducks 22-23

Créé par: MC27
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 16 mai 2022
Publié: 19 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Taking a bit of a different approach with my second AGM. This one is aimed at a more traditional rebuild, which starts with moving Anaheim’s biggest trade chip. Let’s get to it…

Trades:

1. This deal sees New Jersey and Anaheim swapping the second and tenth overall picks, respectively. According to multiple studies, a second overall draft pick is worth roughly twice as much as a tenth overall pick. This would put Gibson’s return value in the range of a tenth to twelfth overall pick. In addition, Anaheim receives three assets that each equate to the value of a mid-round pick.

Misyul fits the mold of a big, physical d-man that Verbeek is seeking. There is not a ton of upside beyond a bottom-pairing guy, but his defensive style should translate to the NHL. He is also under contract in the KHL through next season. Tatar is a solid middle-six forward with good puck possession numbers. He can help Anaheim next season and be flipped at the trade deadline, with salary retention, for an additional mid-round pick. Many of the Gibson-to-NJ proposals have included Mackenzie Blackwood. While it does make sense at a glance, I do not think Anaheim would be interested. Blackwood’s cap hit for next season is only $2.8 million, however, he is owed $4.125 million in real money. There are cheaper UFA options for a team that is concerned about their bottom-dollar.

The speculation is that Anaheim is seeking a first-round pick and a top prospect for Gibson. This return does not include a top prospect, but it does include an extremely valuable pick swap. For New Jersey, they receive their “franchise goalie” and would still have their pick at a high-end prospect with the tenth overall selection. Obviously, your view on this trade depends on how you view John Gibson.

2. A recent report said that it would take “at least” a second round and a fourth round pick to dump the remaining two years of Patrick Nemeth’s contract. If that is the case, Anaheim should be first in line. Nemeth also has ties to Verbeek from his time in Detroit. He was a solid, veteran defenseman on a young team, and could play a similar role in Anaheim.

3. This is simply a paper move to get Anaheim comfortably over the cap floor next season. Bishop has a cap hit of ~$4.9 million, but it owed only $2.5 million in real money. This trade would need to be completed after Bishop is paid his $1 million signing bonus, presumably on July 1.

RFA signings:

Milano gets 3x$3 mil and Lundestrom gets 5x$2.88 mil. I do think Anaheim will be hesitant to give Milano more than 3-4 years due to his injury history. Benoit and Steel both get rewarded with multi-year contracts after having their best NHL seasons to date. Vaakanainen and Elvenes both accept their QO’s. Badini, Durny, Guhle, and Larsson do not receive QO’s and becomes UFA’s.

UFA signings:

The Ducks have had a difficult time attracting UFA’s in past seasons. Manson is familiar with the area and was open to signing an extension before being traded to Colorado. Barring any hurt feelings, he would be a welcome re-addition to the right side. Comrie grew up in Newport Beach and still works out at the Ducks practice facility during the offseason. This is a slight overpay, but I’d rather take a chance on Comrie over many of the veteran UFA options.

Looking ahead:
With the second overall pick in the 2022 draft, Anaheim selects Logan Cooley. This gives the Ducks another blue-chip prospect and allows them to build around Zegras-Cooley-McTavish with Lundestrom as 4C. With their next two picks, they are hopefully able to add a right-handed defenseman to address their weakness at the position.

Tatar (50% retained) and Anthony Stolarz are both flipped at the deadline for mid-round draft picks. Lucas Dostal, Jacob Perreault, and Brayden Tracey should all see significant NHL playing time and hopefully be ready for full-time roles in 2023-24. The Ducks will likely miss the playoffs once again, but will have a shot at winning the Bedard sweepstakes.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
52 880 000 $
21 200 000 $
3900 000 $
1787 500 $
2800 000 $
1874 125 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 125 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
43 850 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Misyul, Daniil [Liste de réserve]
  2. Tatar, Tomas
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
NJD
  1. Gibson, John
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Nemeth, Patrik
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
2025 2nd round pick (NYR)
NYR
    Future considerations
    3.
    ANA
    1. Bishop, Ben
    Détails additionnels:
    Trade completed after 7/1 signing bonus
    DAL
      Future considerations
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de NYI
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de NSH
      2023
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de COL
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      2024
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2382 500 000 $59 753 709 $0 $4 200 000 $22 746 291 $

      Formation

      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      C, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
      AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
      AG, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      C, AG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 880 000 $2 880 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      425 000 $425 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 1
      2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      874 125 $874 125 $
      DG/DD
      RFA - 2
      3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      950 000 $950 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      900 000 $900 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      750 000 $750 000 $
      DG/DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Stars de Dallas
      4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
      G
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner

      Commentaires populaires

      19 mai 2022 à 20 h 2
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2021
      Messages: 4,591
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,349
      Gibson is not 23. He's not worth all that anymore. His GSAx was a -14.3 this year....
      19 mai 2022 à 20 h 9
      #2
      Shaners79
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 641
      Mentions "j'aime": 187
      I'm going to pretty frank here. I would love to have Gibson on our team but I'm not sure he's worth swapping 1st and then us adding. Case in point, Schneider was traded for 9th overall (Horvat) straight up. He was younger and had a above .920 save percentage for 3 + years.
      19 mai 2022 à 20 h 46
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2021
      Messages: 16
      Mentions "j'aime": 2
      Quoting: Shaners79
      I'm going to pretty frank here. I would love to have Gibson on our team but I'm not sure he's worth swapping 1st and then us adding. Case in point, Schneider was traded for 9th overall (Horvat) straight up. He was younger and had a above .920 save percentage for 3 + years.


      That is a fair trade to bring up. I'd say 9OA is very similar to the value of the pick swap (which is somewhere between the value of an additional 10-12OA pick) and a few smaller pieces. As for Schneider, he had never started more than 30 games in a NHL season. I compare that trade to the Raanta deal, though there were more pieces involved. Like I said in my explanation, your opinion of the deal is going to vary based on your opinion of John Gibson. I do believe he commands more respect around the league than his numbers may reflect. He was recently ranked 4th in the annual players poll and was 5th in an anonymous NHL GM/coaches poll prior to the season. Obviously I don't know where NJ's FO stands on him. But Anaheim isn't desperate to trade him and I don't think he'll be going anywhere unless they get premium value.
      19 mai 2022 à 20 h 54
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2019
      Messages: 41,140
      Mentions "j'aime": 18,717
      Quoting: Shaners79
      I'm going to pretty frank here. I would love to have Gibson on our team but I'm not sure he's worth swapping 1st and then us adding. Case in point, Schneider was traded for 9th overall (Horvat) straight up. He was younger and had a above .920 save percentage for 3 + years.


      The counter-argument to Schneider vs Gibson is the latter is more of a workhorse though.
      If we want a true #1, he is probably the best bet these days.

      If you have a .915 goalie for 60 games
      And a .900 back-up for 20 games
      You get a .911 tandem

      If you a .920 goalie for 40 games
      And a couple .900 back-ups for rest
      You get a .910 unit

      Campbell, Samononov, Holtby, etc aren't giving you 55-60 starts.

      I am open to it if it means we never see Gillies, Hammond, etc again
      20 mai 2022 à 4 h 52
      #5
      Shaners79
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 641
      Mentions "j'aime": 187
      Quoting: NHLfan10506
      The counter-argument to Schneider vs Gibson is the latter is more of a workhorse though.
      If we want a true #1, he is probably the best bet these days.

      If you have a .915 goalie for 60 games
      And a .900 back-up for 20 games
      You get a .911 tandem

      If you a .920 goalie for 40 games
      And a couple .900 back-ups for rest
      You get a .910 unit

      Campbell, Samononov, Holtby, etc aren't giving you 55-60 starts.

      I am open to it if it means we never see Gillies, Hammond, etc again


      I'm absolutely open to it too. I'd just would rather try to do a straight up hockey trade.
      Voir tout