SalarySwishSalarySwish

Chicago helps us again

Créé par: BoomerTheHero
Équipe: 2022-23 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 20 avr. 2022
Publié: 20 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
This is my first try at this, so let me know how far off I am.

Nyquist trade: saw it on another thread from a OTT fan that said a '23 2nd for him. I like Gus, but unfortunately we need space for some young guys.

Murphy/Strome: Would love to bring Murphy home and there were rumors that we were interested in Strome at the TDL. I'm not really sure of each's value, but my thought was:

Foudy + 3rd for Strome
Bean, Bemstrom, and a 2nd for Murphy
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
43 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
2.
CBJ
CHI
  1. Bean, Jake
  2. Bemström, Emil [Droits de RFA]
  3. Foudy, Liam [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de OTT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $73 862 500 $0 $2 475 000 $8 637 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 4
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance700 000 $$700K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
787 500 $787 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

20 avr. 2022 à 16 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
For the package of those two you can give us our 1st back. If not, pass. Nothing in that package is worth moving those two
csick, Garak et Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2022 à 16 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 748
Mentions "j'aime": 813
Quoting: Wadejos123
For the package of those two you can give us our 1st back. If not, pass. Nothing in that package is worth moving those two


Yeah, thats what i would expect CHI to ask for. Obviously we would never do that because those 2 are not worth the top 10 pick, but makes sense for y'all to want it back. Thats why i tried to think of it as 2 separate trades based on a few other ones i saw on other threads. But, yeah trading with CHI will be hard for us cause the ask will always come back to the 1st, which I don't think Jarmo would part with.
20 avr. 2022 à 16 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
Quoting: BoomerTheHero
Yeah, thats what i would expect CHI to ask for. Obviously we would never do that because those 2 are not worth the top 10 pick, but makes sense for y'all to want it back. Thats why i tried to think of it as 2 separate trades based on a few other ones i saw on other threads. But, yeah trading with CHI will be hard for us cause the ask will always come back to the 1st, which I don't think Jarmo would part with.


Those two combined are most definetly worth our 1st back assuming it doesn't win the lottery. If the trade was post lottery and that pick was like 8th those two are easily worth that
Garak et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2022 à 16 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 748
Mentions "j'aime": 813
Quoting: Wadejos123
Those two combined are most definetly worth our 1st back assuming it doesn't win the lottery. If the trade was post lottery and that pick was like 8th those two are easily worth that


If thats all we were sending then maybe, but we have a logjam at forward that we would look to leverage in any trade. We would have to move players out in order to bring another in. So when i said they arent worth the 1st, i mean they arent worth the 1st, a young bottom 4 defenseman, and 2 promising 22 year old players.

Either way, I was considering our 1sts this year and probably next as untouchable because it seems Jarmo has no intention on moving those. So i was just trying to make something work with out the 1st.
20 avr. 2022 à 17 h 7
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
Quoting: BoomerTheHero
If thats all we were sending then maybe, but we have a logjam at forward that we would look to leverage in any trade. We would have to move players out in order to bring another in. So when i said they arent worth the 1st, i mean they arent worth the 1st, a young bottom 4 defenseman, and 2 promising 22 year old players.

Either way, I was considering our 1sts this year and probably next as untouchable because it seems Jarmo has no intention on moving those. So i was just trying to make something work with out the 1st.


There isn't anything that would work. Hawks would move them to other teams willing to pay more. Foudy, in my opinion, is looking like a bust. HAwks already have a logjam on D and probably don't want Bean, and those picks aern't close to early enough to get it done
Garak a aimé ceci.
Voir tout