SalarySwishSalarySwish

Still In a Rebuild

Créé par: Christian17
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 1 déc. 2021
Publié: 1 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
The Ducks are playing really well right now, if they kept all of their expiring UFAs they'd likely be a wild card playoff team, however, they shouldn't be trying to make the playoffs despite their greatly improved play because their contention window does not warrant resigning most of the UFAs in Lindholm, Rakell & Manson. Because of this it's time to sell while they have good value.

After the selloff Anaheim's forward group should still be decent, however, their defensive core is decimated with 3 of their top 4 best defensemen gone. Fowler is still really good, and we'll see what Drysdale is without Lindholm, but after that, this selloff makes them a team that will be perfectly positioned for a top 10 draft selection along with two picks that will likely go somewhere in the high 20s.
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Jones, Zachary
  2. Lamb, Brody [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Lindholm is a solid top 3 dman, that drives play and improves every dman he's played with. Rangers need a solid defenseman, because although their goalie has been getting them wins their play in their own zone has been baaaad.
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Minnesota is legit and they should try and go all in this year because who knows what happens next year when Parise and Suter's contract really start to bite into their cap. Rakell is a top 6 winger on a stellar cap hit already.
MIN
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 894 222 $ retained)
3.
ANA
  1. Johnson, Erik
  2. Olausson, Oskar
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Erik Johnson is bad and on a big bad contract for another year.
COL
  1. Shattenkirk, Kevin (1 900 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Shattenkirk is on pace for 50+ points on the Ducks On his own he would be able to net a 1st, because of taking on Johnson's cap next year and also the pick once removed he should be able to get this.
4.
ANA
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
DeBrusk is done in Boston, his qualifying offer would be +4M as an RFA. Manson is a solid top 4 D.
BOS
  1. Manson, Josh
Détails additionnels:
I don't think DeBrusk is that good, and I think Manson should net a low 1st somewhere, but I'd be willing to bet that DeBrusk will salvage some of his past hype somewhere else.
5.
ANA
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Deslauriers, Nicolas
Détails additionnels:
Marek was saying teams were offering a 1st for DLo, he's not worth that obviously, but GMs are stupid sometimes.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $64 240 388 $0 $3 282 500 $17 259 612 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

1 déc. 2021 à 17 h 8
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
I doubt the Rangers do that. They probably can't afford resigning Lindholm because they have to resign Blais, Kakko (,Gauthier, Georgiev) and maybe Strome in 2022 and Lafrenière, Chytil and Miller in 2023.

I think the Wild will try to acquire a Center not a Winger at the TDL.

Shattenkirk alone wouldn't get a 1st. Avs probably decline.

Manson could get a 2nd and a 3rd, but I don't think the Bruins (or anyone) would add DeBrusk.
OldNYIfan, GeneralLandro et TanSor a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 17 h 14
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,612
Mentions "j'aime": 25,462
Modifié 1 déc. 2021 à 18 h 54. Raison: added explanatory phrase
I think that it makes no sense for Anaheim to move Shattenkirk, who still has a year left on his contract after this season, if they're going to lose Lindholm and Manson; they'll need the veteran leadership he provides in their absence. Moreover, while I think that it makes sense to move on from Manson, and perhaps from Rakell, I also think that the Ducks will make a serious effort to re-sign Lindholm.

I agree with my esteemed colleague @TZ11 that if the Wild are buyers at any point this season, they'll be looking for a center, not a winger.
GeneralLandro et TanSor a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 19 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,494
Mentions "j'aime": 9,121
Like seriously are people doing drugs? On what planet do the Avs give up a top forward prospect AND a 1st td pick for a dman they don’t need? I’ve seen some bad trades on here but this is up there. The Avs literally laugh when the Ducks say Shattenkirk, then report you to the league for obvious substance abuse problems. Awful doesn’t even begin todescribe it. I mean ffs Shattenkirk gets 3rd pairing ice time and zero PP on a team like the Avs. This is epically bad. B. A. D. Bad.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 19 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,494
Mentions "j'aime": 9,121
Quoting: TZ11
I doubt the Rangers do that. They probably can't afford resigning Lindholm because they have to resign Blais, Kakko (,Gauthier, Georgiev) and maybe Strome in 2022 and Lafrenière, Chytil and Miller in 2023.

I think the Wild will try to acquire a Center not a Winger at the TDL.

Shattenkirk alone wouldn't get a 1st. Avs probably decline.

Manson could get a 2nd and a 3rd, but I don't think the Bruins (or anyone) would add DeBrusk.


Avs don’t decline they freaking laugh. On what planet does a team give up another dman a 1st and a top forward prospect for a guy that will be on the 3rd pairing and not get a minute of PP time? This is epically bad, there is zero reason for the Avs to trade for a defenseman, much less give up something that would net a top 6 forward. Awful.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 19 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,494
Mentions "j'aime": 9,121
Awful
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
Voir tout