SalarySwishSalarySwish

Ducks/Jets

Créé par: Boojets
Équipe: 2016-17 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 28 août 2016
Publié: 28 août 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Connor, Kyle
  2. Copp, Andrew
  3. Little, Bryan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (WPG)
WPG
    rights to Lindholm and Rakell
    2.
    EDM
    1. Bieksa, Kevin
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (ANA)
    3.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2017
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2018
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2019
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2273 000 000 $64 592 500 $0 $850 000 $8 407 500 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    UFA - 3
    8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    675 000 $675 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    825 000 $825 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 5
    2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    863 333 $863 333 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    28 août 2016 à 15 h 28
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,746
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,779
    I don't get it.. Rakell and Lindholm both fill needs for the Ducks, why trade them for this? Little is in his prime, yet scored less than Raks who is sill young and improving (not to mention Raks will not cost $4.7m). And then Lindholm - likely the Duck's #1 Dman for the next decade - is going for a 4th liner, prospect, and pick. The Ducks have an aging core and are trying to win now. How does this achieve that at all?

    The D core is so thinned that you have Montour and Theo playing together, who - despite great potential - have only 20 games NHL experience between them, and both of whom are caught in the offensive zone more than their own.
    28 août 2016 à 15 h 32
    #2
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 13,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
    Little scored 1 less point in 15 less games...
    28 août 2016 à 15 h 49
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 658
    Mentions "j'aime": 30
    Quoting: Jded
    I don't get it.. Rakell and Lindholm both fill needs for the Ducks, why trade them for this? Little is in his prime, yet scored less than Raks who is sill young and improving (not to mention Raks will not cost $4.7m). And then Lindholm - likely the Duck's #1 Dman for the next decade - is going for a 4th liner, prospect, and pick. The Ducks have an aging core and are trying to win now. How does this achieve that at all?

    The D core is so thinned that you have Montour and Theo playing together, who - despite great potential - have only 20 games NHL experience between them, and both of whom are caught in the offensive zone more than their own.

    Ducks thin Dcore? That is actually so wrong its funny. Connor is more than a prospect if playing with Gretz and Perry probably scores 20-25 goals as a rookie. Little is a number center last 5 years and scores really well at even strength (where the ducks struggled last year). Ducks need forward depth its what they are lacking this helps. They have no issues on the back end. (2nd best defensive team last year). They need to score more this trade helps them do that. And keeps their budget in line.
    28 août 2016 à 20 h 25
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,594
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,734
    It could work. Personally if I were Anaheim I would want a little more insurance in regards to 2 things before I could officially say yes to this deal. One would be to see how Connor would do in his first season before taking him and two, see where that pick ends up. For me if Connor shows 100% he's NHL ready and that 1st rounder is guaranteed to be a lottery pick, than I think you might have a deal. The most important part for me is the 1st rounder. If it isn't a lottery pick than I'm declining.
    28 août 2016 à 21 h 15
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 658
    Mentions "j'aime": 30
    Quoting: F50marco
    It could work. Personally if I were Anaheim I would want a little more insurance in regards to 2 things before I could officially say yes to this deal. One would be to see how Connor would do in his first season before taking him and two, see where that pick ends up. For me if Connor shows 100% he's NHL ready and that 1st rounder is guaranteed to be a lottery pick, than I think you might have a deal. The most important part for me is the 1st rounder. If it isn't a lottery pick than I'm declining.


    Connors season last year is a much better indication and versy season who everyone went nuts over.
    Voir tout