SalarySwishSalarySwish

Habs and Ducks - looking to the future

Créé par: RoadRunner72
Équipe: 2019-20 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 27 nov. 2019
Publié: 28 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Not necessarily a reaction to last night Bruins game. But let's assume Habs continue to slip down the standings, and Toronto/Tampa/Florida pass them by.
Assuming Price continues average play, so they are doomed for this year. They decide closer to trade deadline to look a couple of years out, when guys like Romanov, Poehling, Kotka, and Caufield are contributing.
Anaheim might be willing partner in a big deal, as they have some very good pieces still in place (Gibson, D-men, Getzlaf, etc.) for a deep run again in the next couple years. Petry could help their offense, and stabilize the right side top 4 defense. Lekhonen adds some middle 6 secondary scoring and great defensive ability.
Montreal takes a bit of a step backward to gain some very good futures. I know that the Price/Weber window is basically now, but there is just no way this team can compete at the top level consistently. They are at least 2 years away from the necessary balance and depth
Assuming Habs end up with 2 first round picks between 8 and 15 next summer, they take Justin Barron (RHD) and Dylan Holloway (LW). The lineup shown roughly simulates a depth chart after 2020 draft - the scratches would likely not be back in fall 2020
Comments? Is the trade value balanced ?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Holloway, Dylan
3925 000 $
Barron, Justin
3925 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Comtois, Maxime
  2. Shore, Devin
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
The 2020 first rounder would likely be top 5 protected, with an option to bump it to 2021 draft
ANA
  1. Lehkonen, Artturi
  2. Petry, Jeff
Détails additionnels:
The 2020 first rounder would likely be top 5 protected, with option to bump it to 2021 draft. Devin Shore comes back to Montreal just to help balance the cap short term
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3281 500 000 $75 578 974 $0 $4 725 000 $5 921 026 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Holloway, Dylan
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
748 333 $748 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
771 666 $771 666 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance175 000 $$175K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Barron, Justin
925 000 $925 000 $
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

28 nov. 2019 à 0 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,656
Mentions "j'aime": 2,518
How is that good for the rebuilding ducks. Explain again.
28 nov. 2019 à 0 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Lmao this is horrible. And I make horrible trades, this is just awful man, sorry.
28 nov. 2019 à 0 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,882
Mentions "j'aime": 8,874
Ducks say “Quack you” and lose your number.
28 nov. 2019 à 8 h 42
#4
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,460
Its not that the value is horribly off, its that the team you chose to make the trade with is wrong. Petry would be moved to a contender looking to make a serious push, not a low end fringe team that knows their success in their youth and draft picks.
28 nov. 2019 à 13 h 52
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,849
Mentions "j'aime": 25,670
I think that the basic premise of your trade (Petry to the Ducks for youth and futures) deserves more consideration than the first four commenters gave it.

I'm going to assume for purposes of this discussion that Petry is and remains a #1 or #2 pairing RD for the balance of his contract. (Objections to that premise raise an entirely different issue.)

The fact that the Ducks are "rebuilding" doesn't preclude their wanting to reach the playoffs this year. If Anaheim beats Winnipeg at home on Friday, the Kings beat the Sharks in San Jose on Friday, and Vancouver loses its next game (an admittedly unlikely but not impossible parlay), the Ducks would be in third place in the Pacific Division when all 8 teams in the Pacific Division have played exactly 27 games (i.e., one third of the season). My point is that Anaheim is not that far away. Adding Jeff Petry (the sooner the better) would significantly improve Anaheim's chances of getting there. When Josh Manson returns from the IR, the Ducks would have a backcourt of Lindholm-Manson, Fowler-Petry and Larsson/Guhle/Mahura-Gudbranson. It is not unreasonable to think that defense might lift Anaheim to 1.33 points per game over the last 42 (56 pts total), which would guarantee them a spot in the Stanley Cup tourney.

Now let's consider the trade itself. I think Lehkonen and Shore are more or less equals, so the basic structure is Petry for Comtois and the picks. With the signing of Brayden Tracey today, Anaheim has Jones and Tracey competing with Max Comtois for a future top-6 LW position, and Isac Lundestrom can also play LW. So Comtois is not essential to Anaheim's future plans, and there's no assurance he will beat out two of those three players. But the first AND the second seem a little rich for me. I would do Petry alone (Anaheim doesn't need Lehkonen) for Comtois, Shore and the second (could even be this year's) or Comtois and an unconditional 2021 first (and maybe a little bit extra). Finally, I note that although Petry is only signed through 2021, that means he wouldn't have to be protected in the expansion draft.

In short, I think that this is a better trade than the others have given you credit for.
Voir tout