SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

sens53

sens53
Membre depuis
15 déc. 2015
Équipe favorite
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Messages dans les forums
140
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM24 juin 2017 à 16 h 18
Sujet: Doughty Deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Vanderm</b></div><div>What is even happening here? No deal, ever, will be structured that way.

Hamonic just went for a 1st, a 2nd, and a conditional 2nd. What is even going back to LA for Doughty in this case? The only real value to LA is the removal of the Brown contract...but you're sending Phaneuf back at a higher cap hit even after $1M retained.

You're over-thinking this. And under-valuing Drew Doughty, a Top 5 dman in the world.

Try this:
Doughty + Brown
for
Chabot + Hoffman + 2019 1st + 2018 2nd</div></div>


Vanderm don't be so obtuse. This trade the kings would improve three draft picks, get an additional 2 picks and also get 4 NHL players at a cap hit they are worth. Boro and wideman are still both young and will be ufa after next year but will be on the cheap to resign, phaneuf had a good year and although his cap hit is 7 he only actually costs 6 so if Ottawa retained 1 mil he only costs 5 mil. Which he is worth. Plus the kings get rid of the brown contract with no salary retained. Essentially they get burrows for brown at less than half the cost and a similar player with only 2 years left instead of 5.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 juin 2017 à 13 h 58
Sujet: Expansion Trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hawksfan88</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>manton_luke</b></div><div>I must have missed something... Can you explain to me how a 36 year old bottom 6 player in Burrows, and a 6th round pick, gets you Silfverberg?</div></div>
Agreed. And is the Panik deal supposed to be pre expansion draft? Cuz it makes zero sense for the hawks</div></div>

These would all be pre expansion draft. The trade for Silfverberg is only if the Ducks plan on leaving him exposed. Which may or may not happen. But if the Ducks are planning on leaving him exposed then at least they get something in return for him and also get a player that is attractive for the knights to draft and they can protect another player perhaps gives them the flexibility to do the 8 skaters and protect more D-Men.
Forum: Armchair-GM8 nov. 2016 à 6 h 15
Sujet: What could have been if all the bad trades were reversed
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>Surprised Phaneuf wasn't on the list...Starting next year having 7m a year for 4 years sure would look nice.

PLEADSE, PLEASE, PLEASE. I have heard this crap about Chara and Redden for years. Chara was UFA, didn't matter if Redden was a Senator or not. Chara was leaving as a UFA. By definition....UNRESTRICTED free agent. Paraphrasing your words. "He wasn't yours to keep."
Thanks goodness for the Sens that they only signed Redden for a three year extension...He was declining before he even signed an extension. And then after Redden three years extension was over for some unexplainable reason, Sather and the Rangers signed him to a six year contract as a UFA. 37 million. Made Redden the highest paid player in the AHL.</i></div></div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>Surprised Phaneuf wasn't on the list...Starting next year having 7m a year for 4 years sure would look nice.

Agreed Chara was a free agent. Keep in mind at that time the sens told him they were only willing to pay him the same as redden. What I am saying is if Ottawa would have offered him the same as Boston and let Redden walk instead. Chara did like playing in Ottawa and at that time he was on a Stanley cup contending team where Boston was 5 years off.

And Ottawa literally gave up nothing for Phaneuf. Sure he is overpaid but at least he is an NHL player. All the guys Ottawa traded are AHL and they all had worse contracts.</i></div></div>
Forum: Armchair-GM15 oct. 2016 à 10 h 38
Sujet: Moving on from MacArthur
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Banks</b></div><div><i>Ottawa would lose Ceci in expansion in this scenario</i></div></div>

I thought about that and here is what hopefully the sens could do to address that and keep Ceci. As per the Expansion draft rules:

Protected Lists

* All players who have currently effective and continuing "No Movement" clauses at the time of the Expansion Draft (and who to decline to waive such clauses) must be protected (and will be counted toward their club's applicable protection limits).

* All first- and second-year professionals, as well as all unsigned draft choices, will be exempt from selection (and will not be counted toward their club's applicable protection limits).

They could ask Dion to waive his NMC and then protect Trouba, Karlsson and Ceci. Then the expansion team would have to select either Methot, Smith or Phaneuf. Keeping in mind they have to reach the salary cap floor of the NHL and that most teams will be protecting top four defencemen they might be inclined to take phaneuf. Taking mostly third and fourth line forwards and bottom pairing D is going to be hard to make the salary minimum.