PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
riles23
riles23
Membre depuis
14 juin 2018
Équipe favorite
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Messages dans les forums
236
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 oct. 2019 à 9 h 44
Sujet:
Mess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Claesson4Norris</b></div><div>I'm not opposed to taking EG, but JJ will not work for Ottawa, and definitely not Both. I think Gudbranson-Hornqvist makes more sense for both sides. More cap savings for Pittsburgh, and Hornqvist will fit better into a 3rd/4th line role as young guys push for top spots than Ryan will. Bobby Ryan with Malkin when he's healthy has the potential to be :hearteyes</div></div>
That's a good point and I agree that no team should want JJ, let alone with another anchor contract in Guddy. I don't mind Hornqvist and Gudbranson for Ryan actually and bury JJ.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 oct. 2019 à 8 h 10
Sujet:
Mess
<a href="/users/LetsTalkNHL" target="_blank">@LetsTalkNHL</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 sept. 2019 à 9 h 3
Sujet:
Per Darren Dreger on Insider Trading
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Miller
Montour
Nelson
Jokiharju
Borgen
Risto
Bogosian
Gilmour
Theyre very deep at RD</div></div>
Gilmour is LD but yes they are very deep on the right side. Though Montour is hurt right now so I can't see them parting from Risto until he is back at least.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 juill. 2019 à 11 h 57
Sujet:
Gardiner
find a new thread to talk about this garbage on
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 juill. 2019 à 15 h 48
Sujet:
Messing Around with Point
That's kinda cool how Puljujarvi just ended up on the team ...
Forum:
NHL Signings
23 juill. 2019 à 10 h 36
Sujet:
Pittsburgh Penguins signed Zach Aston-Reese (2 Years / $1,000,000 AAV)
<a href="/users/pharrow" target="_blank">@pharrow</a> I understand that you like Jarry more than DeSmith and it couldn't be more obvious. It is nearly impossible to have a debate with you because you don't care about stats or anything logical that goes into a debate. What <a href="/users/vmark" target="_blank">@vmark</a> said about not having DeSmith last year and they don't make playoffs, is 100 percent accurate. DeSmith has put "Murray like" numbers up in the NHL (obbviously in a smaller portion) and is reliable as a backup - Jarry is not reliable at this point in time therefore is the goalie that is expendable. Paying a backup 1.25 is not overpaying. If they didn't want him, they would have waited until this summer and let him walk. They made up their mind as to who they wanted as their backup, and it isn't Jarry.
As for your solution of just sending guys to the minors to clear cap space - this is not the way you run a team and clear space. In order to move a bad contract (Johnson) they will need to give a team an incentive (Rust/Bjugs/Jarry) to take it. If it was easy to get rid of, it would have been done already.
Forum:
NHL Signings
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 55
Sujet:
Pittsburgh Penguins signed Zach Aston-Reese (2 Years / $1,000,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>That's not true at all. Jarry will be just fine.
They always knew they would move or lose DeSmith.</div></div>
you are saying DeSmith's stats don't matter, the contract they gave him is cus they don't want to keep him and Jarry is better. You don't back up anything you say with facts or even valid points, you speak in hypotheticals and nonsense
Forum:
NHL Signings
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 46
Sujet:
Pittsburgh Penguins signed Zach Aston-Reese (2 Years / $1,000,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>They signed Jarry to a 1 way deal on the 2nd year. AKA they wanted him to back up.
The only reason DeSmith was the backup last year and not Jarry is they wanted jarry to play more in WBS. Jarry is the better goal tender.
I could care less about the stats. If you watched DeSmith play you know he's good enough to lose by 1. He never wins a tight game. On top of it his PK average is awful.</div></div>
You don't care about stats ... lol okay then. So they probably signed DeSmith to a 3yr deal paying him 1.25mil cus they don't want him to play. Great logic.
DeSmith might be good enough to lose by 1 but Jarry isn't even good enough to have the chance to lose by 1.
Forum:
NHL Signings
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 39
Sujet:
Pittsburgh Penguins signed Zach Aston-Reese (2 Years / $1,000,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>who cares if DeSmith clears waivers. You act like that's losing something.
on top of it, I don't think anyone picks him up. He's not that good.
They planned on Jarry being the backup this year to begin with. That's why he was signed to a 1 way deal.
and yes, just send JJ and DeSmith down and you are there.</div></div>
It is losing the backup for nothing. How do you figure they planned on Jarry being the backup this year when they JUST gave DeSmith a 3 year deal @ 1.25? How can you honestly say "he's not that good"? Do a quick research on his stats and compare them to Jarry then we can talk again.
Forum:
NHL Signings
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 15
Sujet:
Pittsburgh Penguins signed Zach Aston-Reese (2 Years / $1,000,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>They could play him 2 mil a year right now and fit everyone under the cap.
He would easily fit, no issues.</div></div>
Please explain how you are gonna make that work with paying Pettersson 2mil? Your plan is to just send down DeSmith (won't clear waivers) and Johnson?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juill. 2019 à 14 h 3
Sujet:
Trying to make it work
He has zero value right now and has put up underwhelming numbers. He also can't be sent down without clearing waivers, which he wouldn't. I think the max he could get is a 4th so if a team is willing to pay that then sure.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juill. 2019 à 10 h 59
Sujet:
Boom Shanka
What is worse than Johnson @ 3.25 for 4 more years? Staal @ 6 for 4 more years!
You have been saying you don't want Gusev and people are overvaluing but you would rather have Staal @ 6 & Toffoli @ 4.6 (10.6), instead of Bjugs @ 4.1 & Gusev @ 4 (8.1)???
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juill. 2019 à 7 h 24
Sujet:
Options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>" a move is necessary"
no it's not. None of this is even remotely true.
They can Bury both JJ and Desmith, and clear enough space to pay ZAR 1.2 mil a year, and Pettersson 1.8 mil per.
Both fair offers on both players. ZAR will not get more than 1.2 in his hearing.
They don't need to trade anyone. They are totally cap compliant.</div></div>
There is no way DeSmith clears waivers, so why would you be willing to lose a reliable backup for nothing? They most certainly need to make a trade, not to mention they will have 9 D on the main roster with Pettersson signed. There is no way to make it work WITHOUT a trade.
OP - I think they will be moving Rust & Johnson. I don't like the idea of moving Rust but they made him expendable with the Tanev signing and he will be a sweetner in a Johnson deal. I would also be content with trading away ZAR's rights with moving Johnson and keeping Rusty. That would give them 4 very good lines.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2019 à 6 h 20
Sujet:
Time to make some moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>yeah or the penguins can just offer sheet him at a 2nd. of course they have to get the 2nd back. but that's why no one is going to give more than a 2nd for him.</div></div>
Considering the Penguins don't have a second in next year's draft, that can't be done ...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 juill. 2019 à 12 h 57
Sujet:
Pens
Johnson is bad, but is he really that bad where you give up Almeida (1.73 ppg in the W) + a 2nd? Not to mention you didn't do anything with the extra cap space you got from getting rid of Johnson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juin 2019 à 16 h 28
Sujet:
Edler
For a team to take the Johnson contract you actually have to give them an incentive ... I don't think a 4th rounder and and AHLer is gonna do the trick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juin 2019 à 14 h 28
Sujet:
trying to keep it simple
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cnb17</b></div><div>I get what you're saying and I don't believe that Kessel or Hornqvist get moved so maybe Jugs.....Simon isn't a defensive minded forward IMO and isn't worth the skates he's on. I like what you're saying about getting Malkin and better LW but I just don't see that being an option with the lack of cap space for the Pens. Unless, like you said, they can move Kessel (huge mistake) or Hornqvist (which I think is the better move but not sure what the return would be...maybe a 2nd or 3rd? but I don't think you get a young prospect) I just don't see the top 6 getting better than what they SHOULD have been last year. Cuz on paper, the top 6 should be solid.</div></div>
Simon is one of the most reliable and defensive minded forwards on the team, not sure how you could say otherwise. And not worth the skates he's on? You are suggesting they pay Lindberg over 3 million to do less than Simon does at 750K ... I am not understanding your logic. I don't think trading Kessel is a huge mistake, he can't do anything 5v5 and is absolutely brutal on his off-wing on the PP. I think his numbers only go down from here and if he can be moved to get rid of Johnson and get a decent return (a young guy, few picks), it will clear up space to allow Rutherford to go after a dangerous winger for Gino and put Kahun on his right side. They now have many wingers that they can rotate in and out of the top 6 to find the right fit but one more elite winger is needed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juin 2019 à 14 h 2
Sujet:
trying to keep it simple
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cnb17</b></div><div>Is the 3rd or 4th line not the bottom 6??? If you're saying that the Pens need a shutdown 3rd or 4th line and I'm saying their bottom six needs to improve.....I think we're saying the same thing.
And Lindberg is a shut down guy. If we can get ZAR and Blueger to be shutdown guys....then you have a 4th line shut down line. Simple. Problem solved.
Agreed about the consistent scoring but that really needs to come from the top 6. And the Pens have NO cap space to improve on that. So getting the bottom 6 more stable and defensive is what the Pens need to look at. IMO.</div></div>
Yeah 3rd/4th line is the bottom 6 but we are not saying the same thing. Paying 3 million for a 4th line defensive winger when you already have one at 750K that you chose to scratch instead is poor use of what little cap space is available. As of right now they don't have a whole lot of cap space but I think Rutherford is 1 trade away from dumping a bad contract (Johnson) and maybe losing one of Kessel/Hornqvist but having that available cap to make a splash in FA to get a LW for Gino.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juin 2019 à 12 h 46
Sujet:
trying to keep it simple
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cnb17</b></div><div>It's double what he made last year I know......but it's hard to tell with FA's on what THEY think there value is. Didn't want to seem like I was undercutting. If the Pens sign him for $2mil - $2.5mil then GREAT! But I believe that is a simple player to go get as his "demand" may not be so high. And he's a decent top 9/ bottom 6 winger which is what the Pens need.</div></div>
Very confused how you think .36 PPG is worth over 3 million. You already have 2 guys that produced at a higher rate (.39 PPG) and are on cheaper contracts (Simon & ZAR). Bottom 6 is not the issue with this team, they need consistent secondary scoring as well as a shutdown 3rd/4th line.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 févr. 2019 à 7 h 56
Sujet:
tdl 2019
Stick to video games buddy ...
- Brodin is not much of an upgrade over Maatta (if any)
- Why would the pens trade away their top 2 prospects, 1st & 3rd round picks for guys that are barely upgrades!?
- There is a thing called salary cap and if Minnesota made this trade, they would be 2 million over WITH term still on the contracts they received
- Where is Ruhwedel? Did he magically disappear to the AHL without clearing waivers?
- Nobody is taking Johnson AND Pearson in the same trade
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 févr. 2019 à 7 h 21
Sujet:
Pens
I really doubt the Penguins are interested in moving Sid's RW (who has had a great second half so far) and one of their best PK for Donato and Miller. Donato can't crack an NHL lineup this year and adding Miller would mean they have 9(!) D signed to the main roster. This is not a good move for the Penguins in win now mode.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2019 à 9 h 18
Sujet:
LINES
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mhockey91</b></div><div>Simon HAS GOT to play</div></div>
That is fine, he can rotate in the 3rd/4th lines. Whether Simon plays or not is the least of the problems right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 nov. 2018 à 13 h 32
Sujet:
Tampa 2019
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>That's a bridge contract for 3 years with a bit less because of the Florida free tax</div></div>
good luck with that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 nov. 2018 à 11 h 34
Sujet:
Tampa 2019
Point is getting way more than 5.5 ... wishful thinking
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 nov. 2018 à 14 h 31
Sujet:
Ducks Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>We haven't reached desperation yet, so I don't think we're trading Montour until the season is beyond redemption (i.e., if we aren't in a playoff position by the trade deadline). That being said, your trade isn't fair value because Maata isn't his equal and Montour is a top-4 defenseman and, to my knowledge, the other two players aren't top-6 forwards. However, when you're a top-10 draft pick and you haven't fulfilled elevated expectations by your third year and then you hold out past training camp, you haven't endeared yourself to management so yes, Ritchie might be available, especially since the Ducks seem to need a wake-up shake-up. You'd have to tell me more about Sprong and Angello to allow me to intelligently opine about that aspect of a deal.</div></div>
I appreciate the detailed response with intelligence behind it. I would say Maatta + Angello (or a better prospect) would be fair value for Montour but like you said, they may not be ready to call it in just yet. I am basically going off rumours and seeing if I can make something of it myself.
Premier
2
3
4
Suivant
Page 3
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com