SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

jpigeon2000

Membre depuis
15 juin 2022
Équipe favorite
Rangers de New York
Messages dans les forums
87
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GM10 mai 2023 à 14 h 57
Sujet: 23-24 NYR 1 MIL CAP INCREASE - REAL BIG SHAKEUP
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aedoran</b></div><div>I agree but I also think if Detroit has a shot at DeBrincat or Trouba at a decent price they have to at least consider it. With Lindstrom going back to Sweden that leaves Seider as Detroit's only RHD. They do have a couple of RHDs but they are player that can fill in if needed but you really don't want them in there for more than about 5 games. With Varna and Bertuzzi gone the Wings have one player that can consistently put up 30 goals a season. They have a couple players that might capable of putting up 30 goals but they aren't 30 g0al scorers until they do. it.</div></div>

Great post. In this scenario, DET would want a Trouba buyout as the only thing it would cost is money - and not much since the buyout is already paying Trouba. Not a perfect example but use Rangers buyout of Shattenkirk as an example - allowed Tampa to sign him to a 1 yr @ 1.75m deal. Only risk is would Trouba want to go to DET if on the open market - being from Michigan, close with Copp, etc would provide an edge. Then DET could have trade resources to target Debrincat.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 mai 2023 à 14 h 48
Sujet: 23-24 NYR 1 MIL CAP INCREASE - REAL BIG SHAKEUP
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoreHitzSeider</b></div><div>I'd take Goodrow in a package deal if the Rags lessen the price for Trouba. But if we're taking the BG contract the Rags would have to retain 2 mil on Trouba.</div></div>

I am assuming your comment is based off of tonyhzs' comment - suggesting that a deal with DET should be Goodrow and Trouba (with retention) for just a mid round draft pick. I cannot see happening.
If the Rangers were going to move on from both (I still feel Goodrow will not be on the team next year - I like the intangibles and some of the other unmeasurable items he brings to a team but the offense &amp; defense he brings can be handled by a more cost-effective player) it would be separate transactions with the most likely being Goodrow traded and Trouba bought out. I can see a scenario with both traded but separate deals - trouba deal probably bringing back a player with a big (but not as big as Trouba's) contract (a "we'll trade you our contract albatross that fits a need on your team for your albatross that fits a need on our team" kind of deal)
Forum: Armchair-GM10 mai 2023 à 14 h 34
Sujet: 23-24 NYR 1 MIL CAP INCREASE - REAL BIG SHAKEUP
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tonyhzs</b></div><div>Detroit will take trouba instead. Apply that 4th round pick to Trouba. As long as you plan to eat salary, apply the buyout cost to retention, and shorten the cap hit time. Detroit will gladly give a 4th for Trouba at 5.8 million.</div></div>

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll keep that note and setup version 2 of the team with Trouba still on it and a version 3 with a Trouba trade.

If the Trouba buyout is off the table and we are looking at trade option only, I don't think NYR would perform a salary retention trade with an extremely modest return due to optics - easier pill to swallow when you can say "we signed multiple players with the money saved from the buyout". Like I stated, less than 1% chance a buyout would be performed - I would prob say a very slim chance of a trade as well due to his wife and her job.
Forum: Armchair-GM4 mai 2023 à 12 h 34
Sujet: hmmmm
can't sign Jones to that deal - RFA qualifying offer has to be a minimum of a 5% increase from previous salary so lowest it can be is 971250. Same thing for Emberson - minimum has to be 895000
Miller is going to get a deal similar to Ryan Lindgren - start point at a minimum is 3yr @ 3mil
Othmann will need to have an impressive camp to make the team. Honestly would probably be better for him to get 1 year of AHL under his belt. Cuylie makes the team.
Can't see this trade happening - looks like Rangers are getting Dube, Kidney, and Farrell for LAF and a 2nd rd pick - no way CAL or MON does this.
NYR will look to trade Goodrow in a salary dump deal. Like the player but the cost is prohibitive. They can use that 3.6mil to sign players who can perform same type of role with similar stats at better price points
Forum: Armchair-GM3 mai 2023 à 13 h 15
Sujet: building a team the right way around igor
<a href="/users/genothegoat" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@genothegoat</a>: can't sign Jones for 850K. RFA rules state minimum offer for player has to be at least a 5% raise - so minimum for Jones would be $971,250
@ Doobs92: rangers are not resigning Hajek - has had more than enough chances. No trade value and arbitration eligible.

Miller will get deal similar to Lindgren (3yrs @ 3mil). Spot on with LAF - same deal as Kakko.
Othmann will need to have an extremely impressive camp - honestly would be better if he gets 1 year of AHL under his belt. Cuylie will make the team.
not signing Gavrikov for 4mil a year to be 3rd pair D. Not re-signing Motte - luxury the team can't afford. Team still doesn't have enough scoring from the right side. So will look into salary dump trade of Goodrow and take that money and hopefully strike some gold finding a decent 2 way RW
Forum: Armchair-GM23 sept. 2022 à 16 h 50
Forum: Armchair-GM14 sept. 2022 à 6 h 21
Sujet: MY 22-23 NYR TAKE 1
Thanks for the feedback

Rask is much better than Carpenter - Carpenter was not a great signing as there were much better all-around players available later on in FA who signed for the same amount of money. My thinking with Milano is someone with offensive potential who could move into top 6 in the event one of LAF, Kakko, or Kravtsov struggles (and the potential of either Kakko or Kravtsov being traded).

With the Rangers needlessly extending Reaves last year that has handcuffed them from getting what they really needed - a veteran left side D. (side note - could have been more aggressive with PTO for the few that were left like DeKeyser, DeHaan, etc instead of Vesey - not that I don't like Vesey but where is he really going to fit). My logic was trading a disgruntled RD, a LD who has never been able to stay in the lineup, and a RW who they should never have re-signed in the 1st place for a left side D who has shown he can play and defensive depth for the minor was solid. Picking up Stanley doesn't mean Jones doesn't play - just provides another option.

In your posted lineup who is on the bench - I'm assuming the forwards are Blais, Hunt, Gauthier, and Reaves which would leave them with 16 forwards. Who is the 7th D (Hajek?). If Othmann and Vesey stay 2 of the forwards have to go - which ones would you get rid of and where (i.e. Hunt and Gauthier would have to go through waivers - their contracts aren't that prohibitive that they would not be claimed - losing an asset for nothing