Éditer l'avatar

jonnymc26

buffalofan

Membre depuis

18 nov 2017

Équipe préférée

Sabres de Buffalo

Messages dans les forums

1051

Messages par jour

0,91

Sujets de discussion

236

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GM 2 nov 2020 à 3 h 45

Sujet: would you do it for that sweet cap space

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sabres923</b></div><div>Sabres decline. They aren’t going to put Okposo in the AHL he’s still an effective player. Ullmark was also better than Fleury this year too.</div></div>

top 6 is locked in for players so its only the bottom 6 spots to grab.
4 players are fighting for 3 spots center and 2RWs
thomposon is almost a lock to be kept with the new contract and Lazar Is faceoff expert and heave defence guy
so question is do you want stall to mentor couzens for a year or keep okpo because he can still be effective.

Forum: Armchair-GM24 oct 2020 à 2 h 06

Sujet: moving on from Reinhart plus some goaltending

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Lindholm outscored Reinhart the last 2 seasons and has an excellent 2-way game. Lindholm is undoubtedly better than Reinhart</div></div>

they are both pretty similar players but reinhart has the higher ceiling and is more consistent in his growth.
we could argue for days over this but neither will back down on who is better so agree to disagree.
only reason i did the trade is cap hits and team needs(LD) other wise i see no reason to do the trade.

Forum: Armchair-GM22 oct 2020 à 12 h 04

Sujet: moving on from Reinhart plus some goaltending

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Skyraider112</b></div><div>No reason to "move on" from Reinhart, he's our best RW. Also, Gibson isn't being moved and even if he was we'd have to add another good piece to make that a fair package</div></div>

Murray just went for a 2nd round pick and he has 2 cup rings.
offer is a top 3 goalie prospect in league, a 1st round pick and a 2nd round pick about ready to make jump its more than fair.

as for reinhart there is no reason too, i am just doing it to fix other issues on the team

Forum: Armchair-GM22 oct 2020 à 11 h 59

Sujet: moving on from Reinhart plus some goaltending

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Flames trade the 2 best players amd add the pick why exactly?</div></div>

well reinhart has best metrics and point totals so not sure what you mean.
Montour is behind Hannifin i will give you that much.

Forum: Armchair-GM21 oct 2020 à 13 h 12

Sujet: why not on a 1 year deal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Saskleaf</b></div><div>Nah, if it was both, the leafs would have a cup by now.</div></div>

when have they had offence in the playoffs to begin with? also leaf's have lots of cups just none 21st century.

Forum: Armchair-GM21 oct 2020 à 0 h 31

Sujet: why not on a 1 year deal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Saskleaf</b></div><div>He might want a bit more. By the way, its "the best offence is a good defence".</div></div>

its actually both, i am sure one came first but you can say the phrase either way and it still makes sense.

Forum: Armchair-GM13 oct 2020 à 0 h 48

Sujet: Lines plan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Skyraider112</b></div><div>Kruger stated that either Olofsson or Girgensons would move to the right, not Skinner.

I think:
Hall-Eichel-TT/Olofsson
Skinner-Staal-Reinhart
Girgensons-Eakin-Cozens
Rieder-Lazar-Okposo</div></div>

I would just switch skinner and olo if kruger said that.
having 2 lines with high scoring threats would be great, but they may have that regardless this year.
I like the idea of grooming cozens with a year at center before making the jump to top 6. (unless staal stays)

Forum: Armchair-GM 5 oct 2020 à 10 h 55

Sujet: tbl hockey trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Theozler</b></div><div>Laine youth makes him more valuable, in no reality does anyone ever waive a nmc to move from Tampa Bay to Winnipeg</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>Stamkos isn't leaving Tampa for Winnipeg, And when all is said and done Laine will cost about $2M more then Stamkos on his next deal. So Tampa declines.</div></div>

cool i have opposite opnions on same trade that means its even ish.
welcome back to home country in Canada Steven

Forum: Armchair-GM 4 oct 2020 à 15 h 03

Sujet: OEL to buffalo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NMAvsFan</b></div><div>He has complete control over where he can be traded. So far, he's said he is only interested in waiving to go to Boston or Vancouver; that's it. And once he gets traded, his NTC still stands so they can't just flip him somewhere else.</div></div>

to my understanding after a nmc is waived to go somewhere the new team does not need to honor that clause anymore because its already been executed. a no movement clause to stay in Arizona doesn't make sense if he plays for/in Boston. Saying a no movement clause follows you to what ever team you move to kinda sounds silly in it own right too. but not a lawyer so will let them fight about it if that ever comes to it.
also he didnt say he was only willing to wave there from what i have seen. it said he would be willing to wave there and those team are interested.

Forum: Armchair-GM 2 oct 2020 à 13 h 32

Sujet: Laine to Sabres

would Winnipeg still do trade with Mittelstadt not cozens if the 1st rounders are swapped too.
i dont see buffalo willing to move cozens at this point

Forum: Armchair-GM 2 oct 2020 à 13 h 29

Sujet: OEL to buffalo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NMAvsFan</b></div><div>What I'm saying is: he'll have better options.</div></div>

he isnt a UFA he doesn't really have options its yes or no. if he waives his no trade he can go anywhere.
i am half thinking that the hoffman trades might look similar where a team he will go to trades for him then they trade him for something better.

Forum: Armchair-GM 2 oct 2020 à 13 h 13

Sujet: Arizona Rebuild

i cant see buffalo saying no to that trade

Forum: Armchair-GM 1 oct 2020 à 0 h 47

Sujet: OEL to buffalo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan</b></div><div>Not for 8th Overall.</div></div>

i think buffalo is going to trade down but its a bit more iffy that they get rid of pick all together.
oel will need a good package, and arz will need cheap players and want picks
Montour and Thompson arnt looking like they are in future plans and buf only has one 1st rounder so

Forum: Armchair-GM 1 oct 2020 à 0 h 42

Sujet: OEL to buffalo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NMAvsFan</b></div><div>OEL is going to waive his NMC to go from the trash heap to a dumpster fire? What a nice guy!</div></div>

tire fire or dumpster fire witch is better hmmm.
pretty sure using eyes we can see Arizona is bad spot, defaulting on paying bonus to players and avoiding paying arena fees.

Forum: Armchair-GM26 sep 2020 à 13 h 15

Sujet: helping NYR out kinda

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RoyalBlueSabres</b></div><div>I'm not after 1oa lol.
But car 1st. Or another prospect.
Also even if it isn't real money that money taken up completely stymies any progress buf can make. And they can't afford to suck again and not get rewarded for it</div></div>

i am very much convinced that ownership has a 70m$ cap for the team in real $.
so my main idea on this was using that cap space for something.
brings in extra picks and boom or bust player in Anderson. rather then just siting on it.

Forum: Armchair-GM24 sep 2020 à 12 h 12

Sujet: helping NYR out kinda

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Yeah a lot fundamentally wrong with the Rangers trade

1) He has a NMC. He’s not waiving for Buff
2) He’d be the best of your 3 goaltenders not sure why you’d bury him
3) Rangers would just retain instead of adding picks.</div></div>

1 he doesn't play for sabers says in the comments
2 he still doesn't play for sabers
3 rangers want cap space and have deep prospect pool so dont need the picks as much

Forum: Armchair-GM24 sep 2020 à 12 h 10

Sujet: helping NYR out kinda

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RoyalBlueSabres</b></div><div>They squashed the rumour about montour and taking back that much cao should be rewarded by more than couple of 3rds and a long shot</div></div>

well not getting nyr 1st, but i think if nyr pays all the contract then trades them makes it more worth it for sabers.

Forum: Armchair-GM24 sep 2020 à 12 h 08

Sujet: helping NYR out kinda

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>12 million dollars to players not playing in the NHL is unfathomable.</div></div>

so i kinda put in the comments that nyr are going to pay out Lundqvist contract then trade him to buffalo to take cap hit.
I don't know the rules well enough to know if that can happen but thats the idea.
for okpo if team sends him down they save over 1m$, witch they then put out a below million dollar player in saving money.
looks bad on paper but better with some details

Forum: Armchair-GM23 sep 2020 à 13 h 16

Sujet: helping NYR out kinda

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RoyalBlueSabres</b></div><div>Buf says no on both</div></div>

free assets with only cap cost when team has self imposed 70m$ cap. I dont see the negative if i am kevin.(other then cheap owners)
supposedly they might not qualify montour so that would be a positive to get something back for him too.

Forum: Armchair-GM20 sep 2020 à 11 h 19

Sujet: making some moves to get that 70m team cap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Nylander. I think Arb would give him 5, theyre always skewed towards the player, especially established players with 2 rings</div></div>

at the end of the day i dont think he would get that at all.
having rings is nice but, he just didnt lose it for pit was not a factor that stole games.
just went on a deep dive into stats for goalies and see he sits around 50-60th for last year in most important stats.
So worth giving a shot but thats it.
<a href="https://www.hockey-reference.com/leagues/NHL_2020_goalies.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.hockey-reference.com/leagues/NHL_2020_goalies.html</a>

Forum: Armchair-GM20 sep 2020 à 1 h 04

Sujet: making some moves to get that 70m team cap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Yes but teams that trade for him are going to know and cave to his demands or they wont give up the assets</div></div>

plausible but they could always just go to arbitration or just give qualifying offer, team gm's job is not to cave.
its not very common that players say they wont sign and sit out on nhl, i can only think of Puljujärvi and Peca off the top of my head.

Forum: Armchair-GM19 sep 2020 à 13 h 33

Sujet: making some moves to get that 70m team cap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>I agree that hes not worth it, but someone will pay him that. I want 0 part of a Murray trade</div></div>

he is an RFA not UFA, on a down year, with a goalie heavy market and a virus that is causing a flat cap.
the odds of him getting above 4m$ are very very low in my mind.

Forum: Armchair-GM19 sep 2020 à 13 h 26

Sujet: making some moves to get that 70m team cap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Murray wants double that. Mitts and Thompson minimum is 874125</div></div>

he can want double that but no one is going to give it to someone who finished with sub 0.900 save %. Ullmark had better season
still a good player but didnt show it this year kinda why PIT looks to be shopping him.
for the sake of not putting in weird numbers i gave Mitts and Thompson 800 000, it looks better and gets point across.

Forum: Armchair-GM19 sep 2020 à 2 h 08

Sujet: making some moves to get that 70m team cap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Byrr</b></div><div>No reason for the Leafs to move back in position or years with that pick for Montour when there are a lot of better options available at around the same cap hit in free agency.</div></div>

I know Toronto wants better players on the right d side, but this is a pretty low cost move unlike the more than 8m$ to sign Pietrangelo.
loosing a somewhat expensive 3rd line center for an RHD you can save some cap on and likely a higher pick in future is pretty good. (PIT due for decline soon)
if you wanted to get a "better" D man you have to pay more saying around same cap hit when you are crunched against cap limit is a bit weird.

Forum: Armchair-GM17 sep 2020 à 1 h 53

Sujet: Just the LD and G to fix now

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Riley816</b></div><div>Vegas trades 7 mil in cap space for ~6.75 mil in cap space AND gives Krebs for the ~ 250,000 in cap savings????</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharks_1999</b></div><div>This is a bad trade for Vegas.

And that's coming from a Sharks fan.</div></div>

apparently you guys missed the explanation line showing this as mostly joking trade.
but hey VG would save 4m$ on goalies at very least and they could use another RHD
would definitely not include krebs unless sabres add another decent to ok prospect going back (Asplund, Samuelson kinda range)

12 Prochain

Page 1

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

jonnymc26

buffalofan

Membre depuis

Équipe préférée

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour

Sujets de discussion