goldie078

Membre depuis

12 mars 2017

Messages dans les forums

493

Messages par jour

0.2

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GM10 sept. 2017 à 23 h 49

Sujet: tavares

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MajesticWalrus</b></div><div>Eichel isn't more valuable than Tavares at the moment, Tavares is a franchise player while Eichel is an elite player with franchise potential. But otherwise nice signings and trades. I'd probably switch their contracts around.</div></div> this is probably one of the most asinine things ive read

Forum: Armchair-GM5 sept. 2017 à 15 h 33

Sujet: Fair trade for Barkov?

Barkov is a stud. If I were Florida I only trade Barkov to Winnipeg if I get Scheifele or Laine.

Forum: NHL Trades4 sept. 2017 à 14 h 4

Sujet: (FLA / DET) - Vanek for McIlrath

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>31 teams had a change at Vanek at 2m a year (Canucks signing), so obviously their wasn't any takers. Obviously "his value" isn't that high, despite his point total.</div></div>

This may be more because of need than anything else. Think of all the teams that need a middle six winger. None of them have the cap space to bring him in and fill out a roster. When the trade deadline rolls around, more cap space will be open, injuries may occur, etc. This would give the Canucks a much better opportunity to move him to a team wanting someone to help their second or third line and power play.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 sept. 2017 à 17 h 37

Sujet: Horvat with Nucks Fans beloved rookies and new veterans in the mix with some blo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>clark</b></div><div>ain't it kind of dumb to talk about vanek and his draft rating in 2003. if columbus had really wanted him they could have signed for 2m, just like the nucks. if the nucks are rebuilding, why give up first rounder top 5 for duchene.</div></div>

Vanes was basically taken to be flipped with 1 year and he's cheap too at 2 million, Columbus would take this because vanek puts up good offense and they need a right handed defenseman. They would give this deal up to Colorado even if they're rebuilfding because this end result makes them a playoff team. Plus they gain a bunch of draft picks in this upcoming deep 2018 draft

Forum: Armchair-GM21 août 2017 à 19 h 33

Sujet: Bye Bye Duchene. Hello Playoffs

Wait why is Vegas giving up their 3 first rounders for a 3rd and a 2 1st rounders? Mironov is a solid prospect, but nothing special esp. considering that Reinhart is a former high first round pick, is there much difference between the two?

Forum: Armchair-GM3 sept. 2017 à 17 h 53

Sujet: Couple moves (PENS + Hawks)

chicago already brought back saad and sharp. if shaw goes back to the hawks they will look the same as there 2015 cup win

Forum: Armchair-GM4 sept. 2017 à 11 h 19

Sujet: Couple moves (PENS + Hawks)

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mhockey91</b></div><div>No way pens do that</div></div>

dont the Pens want maata off their books with that contract? it goes from 4 mill for 5 more seasons, to a 3C they need at 4.5 mil for 1 season. plus a prospect and a pick.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 sept. 2017 à 10 h 40

Sujet: duchene to NJ

I'm a Devils fan and I would take this in a heartbeat, but no way Joe Sakic does this deal. The Avs acquire a good prospect in McLeod, a mediocre prospect in Bastian, and Lovejoy is the worst defenseman on the team in ny opinion. And then only a second and third. Devils would get elite forward with duchene, decent defense prospect with meloche, and a third in return. This would be unfair to the Avs and this is coming from a Devils fan

Forum: Armchair-GM3 sept. 2017 à 14 h 24

Sujet: Salary cap issues

Blue Koolaid

Forum: NHL29 août 2017 à 16 h 53

Sujet: Edmonton Vs Toronto

Now, in the future, or in the past? Because its Edmonton no matter what.

Forum: NHL29 août 2017 à 14 h 47

Sujet: Edmonton Vs Toronto

How is this even a question???

Forum: NHL3 sept. 2017 à 2 h 6

Sujet: Which team is farthest from Cup contention?

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forum: Armchair-GM1 sept. 2017 à 19 h 49

Sujet: Is this roster good enough for a Wildcard spot???

Although I can't imagine that Petry would waive his NMC for AZ, it's actually an interesting proposal. The contract is a little pricey for the Coyotes, but Petry's been steady and could be a good fit for them.
The Coyotes simply have too many ? right now to really know whether they can be a bubble team. A lot of young players with a lot of upside, but most of them haven't proved much at the NHL level yet. And we haven't seen Tocchet's system yet either.
Out of curiosity, why do you have Dvorak as a winger? Did you see his faceoffs last year? 471 / 1006 was second only to Hanzal. He's definitely a center.
Martinook played a good bit of center last year and he could do it again as an injury fill-in if needed. (His faceoff rate wasn't atrocious either at 460 / 1037).
That contract is too low for Duclair.
Very doubtful Latta makes the club out of camp. Him and Etem maybe get some call-up games if they perform well in Tucson. I'd say more likely Fischer makes the club.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 sept. 2017 à 14 h 33

Sujet: TOR, CBJ and MTL Trades

Sorry Tomcas, but I do agree with Laynious that Toronto would definitely make that move. I also however agree with Robb, that this doesn't address Montreal's needs in anyway! (but should add. . . . "WHO CARES")!

Forum: Armchair-GM1 sept. 2017 à 13 h 8

Sujet: TOR, CBJ and MTL Trades

I honestly think Toronto would do that trade in a heartbeat.

Forum: Armchair-GM31 août 2017 à 22 h 32

Sujet: Trade with Toronto

The Leafs would take that any day.

Forum: Armchair-GM31 août 2017 à 22 h 24

Sujet: Trade with Toronto

I don't see how this helps the Caps. Either of them can be easily replaced by a prospect.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 sept. 2017 à 13 h 18

Sujet: Faulk/JVR

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Laynious</b></div><div>

Its not a bad trade. Every trade has a risk. Yes JVR is on his final year and could bolt at the end of the year. So add in an extension or make the other piece conditional on him signing an extension.

There are ways around it to protect both sides. JVR would instantly be the Canes top LW.</div></div>

You're right, it isn't a bad trade. It's a terrible trade. And no, JVR would not be the Canes top LW, that would be Skinner.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 sept. 2017 à 12 h 47

Sujet: Faulk/JVR

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Laynious</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kaljjis</b></div><div>That's bad for canes.

I'd just wait a year and try to sign him to play with his bro.</div></div>

I wouldn't call it bad. Slavin is more then capable of picking up the Faulk slack. TOR needs to add something but I don't think its a bad trade. If you are going to try and sign him anyway, why not trade from a position of strength? Then sign him (JVR) when the season is over.</div></div>

It is a bad trade. Young number one defensman on a cheap contract for an above average left winger who could possibly leave after the season.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 sept. 2017 à 12 h 33

Sujet: Faulk/JVR

That's bad for canes.

I'd just wait a year and try to sign him to play with his bro.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 sept. 2017 à 13 h 11

Sujet: JVR/Faulk

:laugh For the last time a one year rental in JVR isn't getting you Justin Faulk.

Forum: Armchair-GM29 août 2017 à 23 h 36

Sujet: Cap Crunch My A**... Not if we do it right

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoovTrain</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeerWolf_OC</b></div><div>The problem with predictions that are two years down the road is that they are two years down the road. A lot of wishful thinking.

That D core looks like bloody chum in shark infested waters.</div></div>

Or, you know in two years that D core could be Stanley Cup contenders... since neither you nor I know what the future holds</div></div>

Just saying, they look awfully "young".

Forum: Armchair-GM29 août 2017 à 22 h 56

Sujet: Cap Crunch My A**... Not if we do it right

The problem with predictions that are two years down the road is that they are two years down the road. A lot of wishful thinking.

That D core looks like bloody chum in shark infested waters.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 août 2017 à 11 h 6

Sujet: Trading Nylander

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>grandview17</b></div><div>Can someone tell me what the big deal is about Doughty??, ok yes he's a good defenseman, but have you really watched him play? he basically turtled last year when the kid from Calgary wanted to kill him, he's averaging 43pts (not 60+) like Karlsson a season and he makes 7mil, which he will demand 10mil+ in 2 yrs. IMO he is waaaay overrated. Yes he's only 27, and a right hand shot but c'mon trading two 60+ point forwards a 50point defenseman oodles of 1st rounder's for Doughty?, no chance in hell I make this deal if im Toronto, If I was LA and Lou called me to offer this, id accept the deal before hitting the ground from falling off my chair.
and BTW, why are there so many trade proposals on this site that include the Leafs 1st round picks? leave those picks alone, that's what got the Leafs in trouble all these yrs. is by trading away 1st rounder's, they are finally drafting well, leave the picks alone.</div></div>

Sorry that you dont realize how good of a player doughty is. Karlsson plays on a run and gun team, doughty doesnt

Forum: Armchair-GM27 août 2017 à 6 h 9

Sujet: Trading Nylander

Sorry leafs fans, this is what it will take to get hall of fame defensemen in his prime. Not van riemsdyk, bozak and kapanen like most of you propose

Premier23 Suivant

Page 2

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

COTES DES PARIS

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

goldie078

Membre depuis

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour