PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
8
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
ashaw9377
Membre depuis
11 janv. 2017
Équipe favorite
Rangers de New York
Messages dans les forums
139
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 juin 2019 à 9 h 22
Sujet:
Kreider
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>Yeah but you guys have Sakic as GM.. he's notorious for being.. well.. a male appendage</div></div>
No need to worry. I'm a Ranger fan. haha I just wanted to get Colorado's perspective on Kaut since I don't follow their prospects that closely.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 juin 2019 à 9 h 15
Sujet:
Kreider
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>Colorado fans overvalue Kaut like most Ranger fans overvalue Kreider.
Similar to the hayes deal, the rangers will get a 1st plus a decent prospect/young player.
Kaut has more potential than Lemieux, so it'll probably be more like this.
Kreider for Kaut+2nd that turns into a 1st if kreider resigns.
Kaut isn't in the upper echelon of prospects, he is good don't get me wrong, but to put it in perspective, he's been outperformed by Lias Andersson at every level (I'm comparing their stats from equivalent years as Lias is a year older, i'm going a year back on Lias) who many NYR fans are labeling as a bust.</div></div>
Personally I would love if the offer was Kaut + a conditional 2nd.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2019 à 15 h 59
Sujet:
What The Starting Day Roster Might Look Like Now
Howden is definitely in the roster. Probably at 3c.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2019 à 15 h 38
Sujet:
puljujarvi
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EricRobson77</b></div><div>Edmonton laughs</div></div>
why? They get a guy who has shown he can produce with elite players around him which Edmonton has. He plays a 200 foot game and can play all 3 forward spots. What has Puljujarvi done with his career? Draft status only gets you so far for so long.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2019 à 14 h 39
Sujet:
would carolina make this trade
I think Pesce is better than Ehlers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2019 à 9 h 38
Sujet:
rangers cap dump for cap dump
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BSpadaro83</b></div><div>The ground work sure. But the numbers you chose make less sense. Giradi's cap hit falls to 1.1m next year. Retaining almost half of Smith AND taking Marleau this year doesnt save them enough in the long run to not be able to go for Panarin. So this deal would have to happen post July 1, when the Rangers miss on Panarin, and cant buy out Marleau at that point, so he doesnt even waive to come to NY because he wants to be out west.</div></div>
I think this deal and Parnarin are not related at all. You could still make this deal, sign your RFA's and sign Parnarin if you wanted to. Maybe the amount retained for Smith changes and/or draft compensation changes but this trade doesn't have to happen after the buyout period is over.
What would you retain on Smith and/or what compensation would you want to make this trade work?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2019 à 8 h 58
Sujet:
rangers cap dump for cap dump
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BSpadaro83</b></div><div>Smiths buyout cap hit is 970k this year and 3.1m next, then 1.1 next two. Why would they take on 6.5 min to keep a 2.1m cap hit this year and only save 1m next year? 3rd round pick isnt worth that, just buy him out and leave you guys to figure out Marleau elsewhere.</div></div>
Because even with the moves they made so far I don't think they are a legit contender. If they could avoid paying smith for 4 years I think that is valuable. Marleau would come off the books after this year. Plus Girardi has a 3.1M cap hit this year from his buyout. Smith, Staal, Shattenkirk all come off the following year. Why keep paying these guys after that if they don't have to. Rangers aren't exactly strapped for cash either. They can afford to make a move like this. Maybe you get more draft compensation than. But I think the ground work of this deal could really benefit the Rangers in the long run.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2019 à 8 h 37
Sujet:
rangers cap dump for cap dump
And if they still want to pursue Parnarin they could still theoretically but moving the guys I listed above or buying out Staal. It wouldn't be easy but definitely doable. After Strome's resurgence last season I don't see why a team wouldn't give at least a 3rd for a guy who is still an RFA after next year. They definitely have flexibility to absorb Marleau's contract and get Parnarin.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2019 à 8 h 26
Sujet:
rangers cap dump for cap dump
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>That's a good thought., assuming the Rangers don't want to spend to the cap this year. Just guessing the Rangers will buy him out but still has his 6.5m cap hit</div></div>
This move still gives the Rangers enough flexibility to get all their RFA's signed. That would put them to the cap but they could also move guys like Namestnikov, Vesey, Kreider, Shattenkirk with retention (if Pionk and Braun were traded there has to be someone willing to take Shatty at 3.3M) to create more cap room if needed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juin 2019 à 15 h 15
Sujet:
Possible 2019-20 Team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>lamar1226</b></div><div>At 2mil, with the success he has had with star players, his versatility to be put at any position or any role, and Edmonton's need for playoff contention right now, I don't think its too far off.
Personally I don't think Shatty has done as poorly as everyone makes out, especially since he was on a bottom 10 of the league team. I think he still has some value, just have to find the right fit.</div></div>
If Braun got a 2nd and a 3rd, and WPG was willing to take Pionk, then Shattenkirk with retention has positive value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juin 2019 à 15 h 4
Sujet:
Trade 27th overall
Rangers jump at that opportunity to bring back Callahan. ohh and another 1st in a loaded draft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juin 2019 à 12 h 20
Sujet:
Sharks Rest of the Way
The offer sheet for Labanc would be a 2nd. Would you take Namestnikov half retained (2m) plus a 4th or 3rd?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juin 2019 à 8 h 53
Sujet:
If Kreider is available the Bruins need to grab him
No interest in taking on Backes
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juin 2019 à 16 h 23
Sujet:
Labanc
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>shmoeman</b></div><div>Fit and trade makes sense, but not even close to enough in return</div></div>
What do you think would be fair. My thinking was that they are in a win now mode and would rather have players that could contribute at the NHL level instead of picks and prospects. Pionk would be good in SJ playing 3rd pair minutes for less than you pay Braun. Vesey would be a top 9 forward for them that adds depth up front. Nieves would be a 13th forward capable of playing on the 4th line. This is clearly quantity over quality here but being strapped against the cap I figured filling out 3 roster spots plus shedding Braun's salary would be enough. Would you be more interested in a prospect like Anderson or Lindgren? Those types of players just don't fit the timeline to me when your paying Karlesson 11.5M a year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juin 2019 à 13 h 4
Sujet:
Karlsson Stays
What would Labanc cost in a trade? Sharks are in a win now mode. Do they want nhl players on cost controlled contracts or do they want younger players on elc?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juin 2019 à 14 h 16
Sujet:
NYR opinions
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bloodykisame</b></div><div>too much for trouba, im hearing deal is anderson and winnipeg 1st i could see nyr adding pionk as well but not moving deangelo. Also vesey will fetch a 3rd alone or maybe a 2nd from the right team, as well as namestikov. doubt colorado will buy out staal maybe a team like ottawa thats going to be a bottem team for a while.</div></div>
Do you have a source for this? Also if roslovic is unhappy what are your thoughts on inclucind him and pionk. Maybe a pick going to WPG as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2019 à 16 h 36
Sujet:
Rangers Hockey Trade What do you guys think
I think the Rangers accept this trade. Not sure Winnipeg does though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 juin 2019 à 8 h 52
Sujet:
Zucker
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RomanPolak</b></div><div>Kind of unexpected and can’t rly see it tbh</div></div>
Why is that? Clearly Minnesota is trying to move him (deadline, Kessel). What is he worth? The rangers have a ton of assets.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juin 2019 à 18 h 45
Sujet:
Trying Something Somewhat New EDM TBL WIN CAR FLA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>LOL
IDK how many times we have to do this. Kreider is the Pacioretty or Turris trade with a little extra because he's better.
How would you rate these assets: Yamamoto, Nick Suzuki, Sam Girard?
How would you rate these assets: Tatar, Kamenev, Puljujarvi
Would you say Yamamoto is a step below the other 2 ? I would
So maybe instead of a 2nd round pick, the little more becomes a 1st round pick. And that 1st round pick moves up in the draft to 8 because Yamamoto is a decent step down from Girard/Suzuki.
That's the rational response, instead of "nahhh Kreider ain't that good"
Strome =2nd
Lindgren =2nd
Yamamoto = 1st
1st
So 2 1sts and 2 2nds for a guy that will cost 7mil + and doesn't give you much more value than Tony Deangelo?
lol
Capfriendly really undervalues cap space.
The Callahan deal sounds a lot like the Bickel deal. They had similar cap impact.
That trade returned a 2nd and 3rd. Very similar to Keane + 3rd.
You know what Chicago added to make up for that cap dump Bickel? Teravainen....yeah you're gonna to add more.
What's the comparable to Teravainen?</div></div>
Pacioretty averages .7 points per game over his career. Kreider .6. That means one is a 70 point player and the other a 50 point player. Stop comparing the two. pach is better. And I'm a ranger fan.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 juin 2019 à 0 h 35
Sujet:
DucksLightning cap dump BosChiCol trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>lol that's cute. You seem to know your prospects pretty well.
I like Senyshyn's production. His 24 points as a 21 year old as an AHL player are impressive. But if I wanted a ....better prospect I could just look internally. Perhaps at Tim Gettinger who 3 more points in 2 less games than Senyshyn, which would be cool But he's also an entire year younger and plays on a team that scored 20 less goals on the year.
Idk maybe I can't get a prospect as good as Gettinger for Kreider. I could hope for one as good as Ryan Gropp...who put up 2 more points in 5 less games than Senyshyn... I doubt any team would give up a prospect as good as Gropp though.
IDK what do you think?</div></div>
My bad. You are just so much smarter than me guy. i guess I should ask for tolvanen and 2 firsts for Kreider. That sounds about right. You also forgot that Senyshen had 1 more points than Gettinget in 2 less NHL games. Since stats are the only thing that matter to you I guess hes the better prospect.
Dont forget Kreider had 23 points in his first season in the AHL. I guess he is worth Gropp.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 juin 2019 à 23 h 55
Sujet:
DucksLightning cap dump BosChiCol trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Yeah that Boston trade is a joke lol. Undervalue on the Fast deal. And you can swap Smith for Staal in the Anaheim deal.</div></div>
How is the Kreider deal a joke? Senyshyn is a former 1st round pick. I think he is a very good prospect, plus hes a right hand shot and exempt from the expansion draft. Under that assumption no one is giving up 2 first round picks for Kreider. Unless hes not as good of a prospect is I believe I think it's fair. You may be over valuing Kreider.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 juin 2019 à 10 h 37
Sujet:
NYR deal and others
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChytilMania</b></div><div>K’Andre Miller is a deal-breaker for me.</div></div>
What about swapping Lundkvist for Miller?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 juin 2019 à 13 h 12
Sujet:
Roslovic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WalterT</b></div><div>I would be ok with either version. Probably prefer Perreult because another high paid dman is not what we need. And I definitely think he would get ice time here. They are looking for young players and if they make a trade like this it's more likely they trade guys like Vesey, Fast, and Namestikov.</div></div>
The reason I targeted Kulikov is because of the 1 year left on his contract. The rangers have plenty of cap space and could either buy out or trade Kulikov half retained. I dont know mich about Perreult but from what I've seen I dont think he fits in the plans after this year. But if the second scenario was the trade I'd be more comfortable including vesey or namestnikov instead of Strome.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 juin 2019 à 12 h 2
Sujet:
Roslovic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>the entire issue he had was playing time. IDK if he would be playing over Kakko, Kravtsov, Buchnevich, Kreider, Zibanejad, possibly strome/chytil.. let alone if the rangers sign panarin. I get not wanting less that 10 m per game, i just don't see him getting more than 11-12 on the rangers which he may not like either</div></div>
I'm not going to assume that Kakko and Kratsov will come in and immediately be ready for top 6 minutes. Also I wouldn't be shocked if one or more of Kreider/Strome/Vesey/Namestnikov got traded this year. Lastley I am a big believer you accumulate talent however you can. Roslovic is a quality prospect and would be a great addition to this young forward group.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 juin 2019 à 11 h 59
Sujet:
Roslovic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Carterman13</b></div><div>As a jets fan I’m a lover of pionk. But the rangers might need to add a third round pick</div></div>
I would have no problem adding a 3rd or maybe a conditional 4th that could become a 3rd based off of points scored.
Premier
2
3
4
Suivant
Page 3
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com