PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Yojimbo
Membre depuis
11 avr. 2018
Messages dans les forums
5351
Messages par jour
2.4
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2021 à 17 h 36
Sujet:
Deadline 3C
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>they move lafferty, rodrigues, and rhudwel to taxi which gives them 2.1 mill in space. GMJR would do it as pittsburgh needs a 3c and Ryan would be a good fit</div></div>
They would have to waive Rodrigues and Ruhwedel, which they don't want to do,as they didn't, and they want to play Lafferty.
Forum:
Site Discussion
11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 58
Sujet:
Suggestions Megathread
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>You realize there's like 12 of us right? Some days, like in the offseason might see 100 a day, days like free agency or trade deadline and it's in the thousands.
There's a collection of users that already think the moderators are unfair, and now you want us approving all AGMS? I'm not interested in even more flack from users that already think they're above having to provide constructive criticism.
How about we just follow the rules and continue reporting the bad stuff instead?</div></div>
I said 150, so 100 is less than I though. However, like I said, after a week all of the just ones will stop because people will know that they are not getting posted. Also, the coach ones will stop with a ACC section. After a week you will probably get about 20-25 per day. Is that too much to review to have a "better" over website for you and a better experience for visitors?
Example... this was just posted trading Zucker for a 3rd https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2174735 A week after imposing review this never gets attempted to be posted and therefore doesn't need to be review. Less mess, less junk, better experience.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 53
Sujet:
Deadline 3C
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>Penguins should honestly look into claiming Derek Ryan if they feel Jankowski or Bleuger aint ready for the 3c spot</div></div>
The Penguins would need $2M additional cap space to claim him.
Forum:
Site Discussion
11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 44
Sujet:
Suggestions Megathread
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>ACC and a Fantasy Hockey section could exist as they're quite self-explanatory, but how do you define or enforce the difference between an AGM and a bouncy house section? Opinions as to what a good deal or a good framework for a deal range wildly and are far too subjective without some mathematical value assigned to players, prospects, and picks. The league itself doesn't even abide by that. How should a new user who's only ever really experimented with AGMs in an NHL-20 setting understand that their trades aren't realistic before posting? Most new users already abstain from previewing the work of other users and a post limit (ex. you need 25 posts to submit an AGM) only really serves to limit site growth. There's a pretty big draw to this site if you can just drop an AGM right after signing up.
What realistically happens is we end up with the same setup we have now, but with the current moderators being asked to move tens to hundreds of more threads than normal. What happens if users don't get the point and continue to post those more wild AGMs in this new "Serious AGM Threads Only" section? Do you expect us to just warn and infract more users? I've noticed a lot of members here aren't apt to report these kinds of threads and are more inclined to just piss and moan about them and how the moderators don't do their jobs.
If anyone wants to see more quality and less of the obnoxious, troll material in the AGM section, realistically the only things that need to happen are as such:
1. Report the bad stuff
2. Improve on the constructive criticism you give to the not-so-bad-stuff
I don't know how many people I've had to tell this to, but the moderators here do not filter through every post made on the site. We only come across trolls and such when they get reported. I have 9 hours of schoolwork per day to manage during my week. Some days, I have enough going on at home or in life that I only have time to check the reports list instead of posting or making an AGM or two. We cannot be a 24-hour surveillance system; the closest we get to that is when users give us a hand by reporting posts and threads so we can address them accordingly.
Conversely, if you want newer users to start abiding by the rules or making an effort to post quality, a lot of "senior" members need to start doing the same. I believe we've been far too lenient on the "[Team] declines" posts that offer no feedback at all or the general discussion threads that end up in the AGM section. If the expectation is for us to start enforcing expectations for a decent AGM, it should work both ways and we should start cracking down more on the poor replies that don't look to improve the situation as a whole or the users that decline to put threads in the correct forum.
Nobody here started out perfect, but had we started in an environment where we would be forced to "sit at the kids table" until a specific level of quality in an AGM post was met, many of us wouldn't have stuck around. Instead, we took the feedback given to us and learned how to make a more realistic trade or signing. Everything was incremental. Other users had patience for you, extend that courtesy for the new users we have today. I would expect there to be some sort of relationship between the growth this site has had, the number of bad AGMs, and the number of quality users that have grown out of some of the more silly stuff. This place kinda needs those unrealistic AGMs and the users willing to listen, learn, and improve on their ideas in order to grow. CapFriendly itself has clearly become more popular, and with that, the userbase has grown and you're seeing more of those posts. Either report them or work with them.</div></div>
If you are going to allow non-constructive AGMs then I am fine with non-constructive replies to them. Instead of giving the replies warnings/points you should just remove the AGM that started it. Treat the cause not the symptom. It is a chicken or the egg kind of thing, but how can you demand constructive only replies when allowing goofy AGMs?
Maybe make it so that a mod reviews the AGM before it is actually posted. Otherwise you will keep getting replies of just "No" or even "This is stupid" Reviewing AGMs before they post would fix a lot, and the mods can decide what goes in a legit AGM section and what is folly and should go into a junk AGM section.
Having AGMs reviewed before they post will also cut back on troll AGMs from the get go as the trolls will know they won't get posted at all. They will not get the satisfaction of the attention. Those will vanish quickly. It will also help the new people as they will figure out that bad PlayStation AGMs are not getting put into the serious AGM section, but in the funZone.
Another bonus of review before post is that it might push people to the messageboard section. A lot of stuff gets created as AGMs that is just messageboard fodder. Many AGMs are not AGMs not even ACCs. Review before posting will push that to where it actually belongs as well.
I don't know how many AGMs you usually get a day, 150 or so? Reviewing that many would be daunting at first, but the troll AGMs, messageboard fodder, etc would fall off quickly and slash that. Also having the ACC section would cut into what needs to be review as well. Within a week it would probably mostly take care of itself. and the number that would need to be reviewed would be very manageable.
Ounce of prevention...
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
11 janv. 2021 à 15 h 29
Sujet:
Oshie to Ottawa
I'd take that is a second if I was Washington, but no one is paying for that Oshie contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 52
Sujet:
a thing
The Penguins aren't going to waive Ruhwedel, Ceci (just signed), and Rodrigues (just signed), and bury all 3 in the AHL (if not claimed) to pay Ryan $3.125M.
The only way this works cap wise is for a trade with Calgary retaining:
Ryan ($1M ret) for Sceviour
That leaves the Penguins with $300K space. But I do not see Calgary doing that. It does open $1M cap for them, but...
Forum:
Site Discussion
11 janv. 2021 à 11 h 12
Sujet:
Suggestions Megathread
This site needs to make 3 versions of this tool:
1. AGM - "Real" AGMs were people actually try to GM
2. ACC - "Arm Chair Coach" for the annoying lineups with no trades/signings and therefor NOTHING to do with GMs
3. AGM-BH - AGM Bouncy House for when people are doing off the wall, 0% chance type play. Troll AGMs can live here too.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2021 à 11 h 7
Sujet:
Ovechkin
Original post removed, but you can't just delete on this board.
How about just a "no"?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2021 à 10 h 57
Sujet:
Waiver Pickups
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fixitf</b></div><div>I put him there because I don't like blueger or jankowski on the 3rd line because they are more of two-way players, and weal has a playmaking element to his game.</div></div>
But Weal is not a center.
Nor is he a 3rd liner. Nor is he better than Blueger. Nor is he better than Lafferty.
He doesn't have the defense for 4th line, or 3rd line, and he doesn't have the offense to play top 6. You say that you want him instead of Blueger because Weal is more a playmaker, yet they scored at the same rate last year, while Blueger also then played great defensively and took faceoffs. 37 assists in 218 games does not make you a playmaker.
Blueger >> Weal, at half the cap
Lafferty > Weal at half the cap
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2021 à 22 h 38
Sujet:
Cheviarelli Trades adjusted
Windjammer reject this yet?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2021 à 22 h 36
Sujet:
Columbus-Washington Win-Now Deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockyluv21</b></div><div>No, actually not. I was making a trade (or trades) that would make Washington better long-term, by adding young players already in the NHL and producing well and betting that they would be even better in a few years. IOW, a clever re-tool on the fly without tanking for picks.</div></div>
That Caps need the talent now, not later. They need it while Ovechkin is still useful. This, technically the Caps version, hurts the Caps. Makes them a lesser team now, and doesn't really do much later, once Ovechkin's influence has been wasted.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2021 à 19 h 46
Sujet:
Columbus-Washington Win-Now Deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockyluv21</b></div><div>To get players before the prime of their careers in exchange for players that are in their prime.</div></div>
I'm trying to not say that this is just Capital trades done by someone that wants to make the Capitals worse... but the more that you post the clearer it is that that is all that this is.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2021 à 19 h 43
Sujet:
Caps Retool Their Lineup With Youth Infusion
That Columbus trade is horrible for the Caps.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2021 à 12 h 14
Sujet:
Eating bad contracts and retooling
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>justaBoss</b></div><div>He's the kinda guy you could have for $1M from free agency currently. I don't think Caps is moving the guy without overpaying due to his term.</div></div>
If the Capitals want a little cap space they have a few guys that they can move. Panik, Hagelin, Jensen, Kempny. I still say the a 2nd, 3rd, Clark is far overshooting the cost to move Panik, but they can just move whoever would cost the least to move. No need to to way overpay to move Panik.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2021 à 11 h 30
Sujet:
Eating bad contracts and retooling
Panik, Clark, 2nd, 3rd for Amadio
Panik hits for $2.75M. He wasn't good last year, but he wasn't bad either. You have the Capitals giving way too much to "pay" to move a not-that-bad contract of a not-that-bad player.
Take out the 2nd and make it Clark OR the 3rd.
Counters:
Panik, 3rd for 7th
Panik, Clark for Amadio
Forum:
Washington Capitals
10 janv. 2021 à 11 h 11
Sujet:
Washington Capitals 2021 season preview
I don't mind Carlson and Schultz being so-so on D as much because the Caps play more of a 3-1-1 then a 3-2. They are much more interested in winning 5-3 than 2-1.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2021 à 1 h 0
Sujet:
Letang Trade
Do you purposly do troll AGMs? Does it make you tingly inside?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2021 à 18 h 29
Sujet:
Nylander trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>my eyes are so bad i couldnt see what that face was doing lol. Where has Eli been or does he have a new user name? you guys always made me laugh. "Crosby takes 55 strides/shift and Eller takes 75 strides/shift. they have the exact same value" lol</div></div>
That's face actually comes up a sarcasm in the text if you click it.
A nickel weighs 5g, a dime weighs 2.3g. Obviously a nickel is worth twice what a dime is! I can't make it any clearer!
Forum:
NHL Signings
8 janv. 2021 à 15 h 57
Sujet:
Buffalo Sabres signed Riley Sheahan (1 Year / $700,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HabsForEver</b></div><div>It's been 10 years so yes it is meaningless after 10 years. After 3-4 years and he's putting up 36 points as a 23 year old then you aren't saying anything about him being a bust.</div></div>
I did when the talk about the Pens going for him started.
However, 36 points doesn't negate my original post.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2021 à 15 h 54
Sujet:
Nylander trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>i cant tell if you are fkin with me or not lol</div></div>
I am messing with you, that's why I put that smiley thing. I view that one as Dr. Evil's pinky to the lips thing.
Dr. Evil: I want... one MILLION dollars! :sarcasm
President: Um... okay.
Dr. Evil: Wait, what?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>IM NEVER WRONG!!!!!</div></div>
See, usually wrong.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>im going to ELI you</div></div>
No, if I was Eli'ing then I would have said that you were usually wrong when starting in the offensive zone on the road on Wednesdays when lined up against off handed opponents... obvious proof!!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2021 à 13 h 49
Sujet:
Nylander trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>lmfao i just had to tell leaf fan to read in my other post.
i said take out age Carlson has more value than Marner..... literally the next response was
"How does Carlson exactly have more value than Marner? Marner's younger"
ugh comprehension is hard</div></div>
I like when you and I disagree, because usually you are just wrong and I am always right... it's not just one of us having reading comprehension issues. :sarcasm
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2021 à 13 h 33
Sujet:
Nylander trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood</b></div><div>Only meat head fans want to trade Nylander for literally any defenceman. An intelligent fan knows he's on a terrific contract and is a terrific player.</div></div>
<img class="for_img" src="https://media4.giphy.com/media/mEahVAkKjt0VL2o5Jk/giphy.gif" alt="giphy.gif">
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2021 à 13 h 29
Sujet:
Little Shake Up Mid Season
McMichael, Sprong, Wilson, 1st for Marner, Engvall
Caps counter with Wilson for Marner $3M ret
You may want to even add Liljegren to ensure that they don't say no and make you look bad.
Trading Wilson would be PR suicide for the Caps. He is potentially more a fan favorite than Ovechkin. And that is not BS.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2021 à 13 h 23
Sujet:
Nylander trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafs101</b></div><div>As good as Carlson is, I'll pass. We don't need a 30+ offensive D. We need a 23 - 27 ish D if we trade a big 4.
Doesn't make a ton of sense for the Washington Hockey Team either</div></div>
The Pens happily offer a deal around Pettersson for Nylander. Look how shiny Pettersson is. Smell that? That is fence free Corinthian leather...
Forum:
NHL Signings
8 janv. 2021 à 13 h 18
Sujet:
Buffalo Sabres signed Riley Sheahan (1 Year / $700,000 AAV)
Another example why saying "He was a 1st round pick" is relatively meaningless after a few years
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com