SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Waiver Pickups

Créé par: Fixitf
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 11 janv. 2021
Publié: 11 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 256 842 $0 $850 000 $3 243 158 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $ (75 000 $$75K75 000 $$75K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 janv. 2021 à 8 h 50
#1
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Yes, please pick up Weal. That would be great, and it would mean we wouldn’t have to waive Perry. But it’s a pretty terrible move for the Pens.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2021 à 8 h 58
#2
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,893
Mentions "j'aime": 8,560
PLEEEEASE TAKE WEAL
Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2021 à 9 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,436
Mentions "j'aime": 6,390
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Yes, please pick up Weal. That would be great, and it would mean we wouldn’t have to waive Perry. But it’s a pretty terrible move for the Pens.


Weal actually is not that bad of a pickup. I wouldn't play him on the third line though. He did well playing the fourth line last season for the Habs.
11 janv. 2021 à 9 h 7
#4
Démarrer sujet
Fixitf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Modifié 11 janv. 2021 à 9 h 33
I put him there because I don't like blueger or jankowski on the 3rd line because they are more of two-way players, and weal has a playmaking element to his game.
11 janv. 2021 à 9 h 40
#5
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Fixitf
I put him there because I don't like blueger or jankowski on the 3rd line because they are more of two-way players, and weal has a playmaking element to his game.


Weal is a playmaker, but you don’t want him doing anything else. I wouldn’t put him at C at all.
11 janv. 2021 à 9 h 53
#6
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Campabee
Weal actually is not that bad of a pickup. I wouldn't play him on the third line though. He did well playing the fourth line last season for the Habs.


He wasn’t actually good on the fourth line last year. Only 3 of his 10 even strength points last year came while he was on the 4th line, while the other 7 he was playing with Domi or Suzuki. He’s useless defensively, and he doesn’t produce enough to warrant a spot on the 4th line without being defensively sound. Which explains why Julien would be more apt to put him in the lineup of a top 6 forward spot was open, whereas he might have chosen someone else for a spot on the 4th line. So if anything, Jordan Weal is probably best suited in an offensive role on the 2nd or 3rd line of a bad team.
11 janv. 2021 à 10 h 6
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,275
Mentions "j'aime": 237
I really hope for Ho-sang to be pick on waiver. The player has so much talent but bad attitude.
Juuslen is a guess. Take him and if he's not doing well, send him to the waivers.
Weal is not that bad, the only thing that kick him out of MTL is because of cap situation and his cap hit.
Also the use of CJ on the PP didn't help him
11 janv. 2021 à 10 h 17
#8
Démarrer sujet
Fixitf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Clapperzzz11, I almost entirely agree with you, but I wouldn't put Juulsen on waivers if he isn't playing well, I would swap him with ruhwedel on the taxi squad because juulsen is still very young and still has some potential.
11 janv. 2021 à 10 h 21
#9
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Fixitf
Clapperzzz11, I almost entirely agree with you, but I wouldn't put Juulsen on waivers if he isn't playing well, I would swap him with ruhwedel on the taxi squad because juulsen is still very young and still has some potential.


He’d need to clear waivers to put him on the taxi squad. But you could just make him a healthy scratch.
11 janv. 2021 à 10 h 40
#10
Démarrer sujet
Fixitf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
He’d need to clear waivers to put him on the taxi squad. But you could just make him a healthy scratch.


I didn't realize that, then yes I would just play ceci in juulsen's spot and leave him as a healthy scratch
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
He’d need to clear waivers to put him on the taxi squad. But you could just make him a healthy scratch.
Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2021 à 10 h 57
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Fixitf
I put him there because I don't like blueger or jankowski on the 3rd line because they are more of two-way players, and weal has a playmaking element to his game.


But Weal is not a center.

Nor is he a 3rd liner. Nor is he better than Blueger. Nor is he better than Lafferty.

He doesn't have the defense for 4th line, or 3rd line, and he doesn't have the offense to play top 6. You say that you want him instead of Blueger because Weal is more a playmaker, yet they scored at the same rate last year, while Blueger also then played great defensively and took faceoffs. 37 assists in 218 games does not make you a playmaker.

Blueger >> Weal, at half the cap
Lafferty > Weal at half the cap
Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2021 à 13 h 50
#12
FrankFurter48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 262
Mentions "j'aime": 65
is 66 avail for Ho Sang?
11 janv. 2021 à 14 h 49
#13
Démarrer sujet
Fixitf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 489
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: FrankFurter48
is 66 avail for Ho Sang?


Not In Pittsburgh, the number is retired
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage