SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eating bad contracts and retooling

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2020-21 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2021
Publié: 8 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Assuming EDM is in the playoff race, trade done near the deadline
2.
LAK
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. McKeown, Roland
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
Canes clear up some cap space for further moves
3.
LAK
  1. Bolduc, Samuel
  2. Hickey, Thomas
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
4.
LAK
  1. Clark, Kody
  2. Pánik, Richard
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Caps need to clear cap space to re-sign Ovechkin and Vrana. Panik as a long-term asset is the most logical asset to move, but since his contract length sucks it'll cost them a bit more.
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de EDM
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
Logo de CAR
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de WSH
Logo de LAK
Logo de WSH
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 892 921 $0 $3 507 500 $11 607 079 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
761 666 $761 666 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (1 425 000 $$1M1 425 000 $$1M)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
747 500 $747 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 janv. 2021 à 23 h 6
#1
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Seems like a really expensive buy for Edmonton, especially when there's more of a pressing need (in the event of a go-for-it-run) for a top-4 LHD, not RHD. A better backup or starter should be on the menu too.

I think if I'm the Oilers, I'm reserving that first and other prospects for something akin to Hjalmarsson + Raanta. I don't trade Lavoie for anything shy of a quality RFA winger, of which he'd be a key piece of a package. Very excited for what a proper shoot-first, big-bodied forward can do alongside McDavid.
justaBoss et oilersfan150 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2021 à 23 h 56
#2
Brock On Dudes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,802
Mentions "j'aime": 521
Isles say no
9 janv. 2021 à 0 h 6
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,998
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
Kings could have picked Lavoie if they wanted to, but they past on him for a reason. All of these trades are bad for LA. The only cap dumps the Kings will take are ones where a 1st round pick is coming back. Blake already stated he's not interested in trading players or acquiring minor assets.
9 janv. 2021 à 1 h 0
#4
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: PinkWhitney
Kings could have picked Lavoie if they wanted to, but they past on him for a reason. All of these trades are bad for LA. The only cap dumps the Kings will take are ones where a 1st round pick is coming back. Blake already stated he's not interested in trading players or acquiring minor assets.


Kaliyev being available at #33 is less of an indictment on Lavoie than you're suggesting. I reckon that's less passing on him and being shocked that a projected mid-first talent was available in the early second round.
9 janv. 2021 à 12 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,511
Mentions "j'aime": 5,026
This isn't a move that will interest the Canes. Likely losing one of Gardiner, Bean or Fleury to seattle means they need all the defenseman they can muster, and Gardiner isn't a cap dump
10 janv. 2021 à 11 h 30
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Panik, Clark, 2nd, 3rd for Amadio

Panik hits for $2.75M. He wasn't good last year, but he wasn't bad either. You have the Capitals giving way too much to "pay" to move a not-that-bad contract of a not-that-bad player.

Take out the 2nd and make it Clark OR the 3rd.

Counters:
Panik, 3rd for 7th
Panik, Clark for Amadio
10 janv. 2021 à 12 h 2
#7
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Yojimbo
Panik, Clark, 2nd, 3rd for Amadio

Panik hits for $2.75M. He wasn't good last year, but he wasn't bad either. You have the Capitals giving way too much to "pay" to move a not-that-bad contract of a not-that-bad player.

Take out the 2nd and make it Clark OR the 3rd.

Counters:
Panik, 3rd for 7th
Panik, Clark for Amadio


He's the kinda guy you could have for $1M from free agency currently. I don't think Caps is moving the guy without overpaying due to his term.
10 janv. 2021 à 12 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: justaBoss
He's the kinda guy you could have for $1M from free agency currently. I don't think Caps is moving the guy without overpaying due to his term.


If the Capitals want a little cap space they have a few guys that they can move. Panik, Hagelin, Jensen, Kempny. I still say the a 2nd, 3rd, Clark is far overshooting the cost to move Panik, but they can just move whoever would cost the least to move. No need to to way overpay to move Panik.
10 janv. 2021 à 12 h 17
#9
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Yojimbo
If the Capitals want a little cap space they have a few guys that they can move. Panik, Hagelin, Jensen, Kempny. I still say the a 2nd, 3rd, Clark is far overshooting the cost to move Panik, but they can just move whoever would cost the least to move. No need to to way overpay to move Panik.


Probably so.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage