Wildwinswhen

Membre depuis
14 jun 2019
Équipe préférée
Wild du Minnesota
Messages dans les forums
309
Messages par jour
0,65
Sujets de discussion
52
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 4 heures
Sujet: Pacific 3 way trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks </b></div><div>I’m not saying this is random, in fact I’d be betting it’s accurate.
What I’m saying is Wilson is known in the league to get serious and then back off or go a different route last min. he does this all the time I’m hoping this is what is going on cause I can’t think of why you’d want 2 high cap hit goalies over 30 coming off back to back poor seasons. Unless he has a deal in place to trade Jones</div></div>

That has to be really frustrating as a fan to have things changing that suddenly. I'm really spoiled having Russo as our beat writer and having GMs who are mostly straight shooters, even if some of them are off their rocker, like Fenton.

For the Sharks' sake, I hope they don't take Dubnyk. I really don't think he has anything left.
Forum: NHLil y a 6 heures
Sujet: What is the trade value of Matt Dumba?
I've seen alot of trades from ACGMs valuing Dumba at a 1:1 for Monahan or a package deal for prospects. My only experience with big defenseman trades is Brent Burns in 2011, ancient history I know. But I'm wondering what the actual value for Dumba should be?

2011
Brent Burns, RHD, age 26, pts = 43, 27, 20, and 46 for 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011
Wild 2nd

For

Devin Setoguchi, RW, age 24, NHL 41 to 63 pts/yr for the previous 3 yrs
Charlie Coyle, C, age 20, Saint John's, 38 to 63 pts/yr for previous 3 years
Sharks 1st

So what about Dumba?
Dumba, RHD, age 26, pts = 34, 50, 22 (injury shortened), and 24 (COVID) for 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019

Wild fans all know how the Burns trade ended up (we lost), but at the time it looked like a haul. Burns was likely to leave as a free agent, which suggests the Wild could get more for Dumba who is locked in for 3 years.

Can we get similar value for Dumba? What does his trade value look like to you?
Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 2:53 pm
Sujet: Continuing Success
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wabit</b></div><div>Johnson has 1 50p season in the last 5 years. It's 4 more years on his contract and he's 30. I want less to do with him than I do with Domi or Strome (CHI). I'd rather have Kunin at center next year than take on his contract.

Johnson isn't a 1C, he's a guy you play in the Haula role when he was here.</div></div>

Johnson points are 31 (Covid season), 47, 50, and 45 pts/yr over the last 4 years going backwards. I'd take that over our current centers.

Kunin at Center was a train wreck last year. I'd hate to see them try that again.

I can agree with both you and <a href="/users/TanSor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@TanSor</a> that waiting may be the better course of action. But if this were our back up plan, I'm ok with that
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 4:48 pm
Sujet: Finding balance between the O and D
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>newballcoach</b></div><div>I tried to get Greenway for Kerfoot and people told me I was nuts. I think he's a great fit for Toronto.</div></div>

I'd do Greenway for Kerfoot (even) and certainly Donato for Kerfoot (favors the Wild slightly, maybe add a MN 6th or something).

But, <a href="/users/wabit" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@wabit</a> is right that Kunin for Kerfoot favors Toronto too much. We'd probably need a TOR 3rd or 4th, something like that, to make the Kunin trade go.

Also, with Greenway it depends on which week you asked Wild fans. The guy will show up and look like a monster and then vanish for four games and then do it again. I'm sick of that. At this point, I want consistency, youth, and hopefully speed. Greenway only hits one of those, so he should be out IMHO.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 sep à 18 h 35