SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TommyBPickles

TommyBPickles
Membre depuis
23 janv. 2017
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Capitals de Washington
Messages dans les forums
274
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GM26 août 2020 à 11 h 20
Forum: Armchair-GM26 août 2020 à 9 h 38
Forum: Armchair-GM14 nov. 2019 à 20 h 11
Forum: Armchair-GM17 janv. 2018 à 11 h 48
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TommyBPickles</b></div><div>I still think you are over paying for what you are actually getting, mainly because RNH is a 2C on any good team, so do you really want to give up Chucky a 1st and a 2nd for a 2C? That being said if you know you have Tavares then overpaying is not as big of a deal. I think if you ignore this year where RNH is having a great year and Chucky is having a down year( along with all other habs) they should be pretty close to a one for one. Definitely not a 1st and 2nd apart IMO.

I personally would be going for a deal that only sends either Patches or Chucky to a team for guys like R. Thomas, Kyrou, Vilardi, Clague. and picks. Although making that kind of deal probably hurts your chances of landing Tavares which is already really low.</div></div>

I think where we disagree is the value of a 2nd line center. If they were alot more available, we'd have one by now (assuming Chucky isn't a center). I think getting a guy like RNH as a 2C (assuming we can get Tavares) puts us in a win-now mode (keeping in mind Price/Weber). I'd love to make a 1-1 deal, but I don't think Chucky is enough to get a former 1st overall pick, who is only 24, and good for 50ish pts/yr.

I'd go as far as saying that if we were to land RNH and JT, do we really even need Danault? RNH &amp; JT would get close to 20min/g of ice time. That would leave 20 min/g to divide between the 3rd &amp; 4th line centers. No need to pay Danault 2-3M$ to play 10-12 min/g.
Forum: Armchair-GM2 août 2017 à 9 h 31
Forum: Armchair-GM23 mars 2017 à 10 h 48
Sujet: Ghost
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TommyBPickles</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ricochetii</b></div><div>I'm of the belief that Beaulieu will get closer to $4M, so I don't see Philly getting any significant savings there.</div></div>

I think everything you else you said is pretty fair, but there is not a chance in hell Beaulieu should get anywhere near 4 mil. Beaulieu has figured out his offensive game in the NHL which is great but the rest of his game has a ways to go before he is a legit top 4 guy. I think Sergachev will definitely be better than Ghost but we still need some one to play with Weber until he is ready and Markov has been good but he is super old. I am curious as to how you see Beaulieu as a different style of player?</div></div>

Beaulieu is on his 3rd contract. Generally the time the power shifts to the player in negotiations. He's arbitration eligible, coming off a bargain bridge deal, and has shown he can produce in the NHL, while averaging over 19:00 TOI this season. His numbers are better than the eye test, and the numbers are all an arbitrator looks at. My opinion (and I could be wrong of course), is that he will ask for around $4M with term, and MB will want another bridge deal. I can't see him taking another bridge deal. So my belief is that it will result in arbitration or an offer sheet.
An offer sheet would be up in the $3.75M range and only require a 2nd round pick as compensation. I can't see MB trading Beaulieu for a 2nd round pick at this point, so he would match the offer.

In short, <em>I believe (Beaulieve? :p)</em> that he will either be signed long term for just under $4M (whether MB makes the decision or via offer sheet), or a 1 year arbitration award in the same vicinity.