PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
TML_GM
Armchair GM Addict
Membre depuis
21 mars 2016
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
214
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 16 h 26
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Doubt if the Leafs want to take the chance that at sometime Kelser is ready to play again so disastrous 6.8m contract can't be hidden. And as suggested above, Kesler doesn't waive.</div></div>
I guess he really likes the Anaheim logo on his paychecks. Seems odd that he wouldn't waive if he is essentially retiring. Again, the deal is only made if the agreement is that Kesler is not returning to play. It is all just speculation until he actually makes a decision on his future anyway. I'm happy to exclude him from the trade. It was just added incentive for Anaheim, which doesn't seem to be needed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 16 h 23
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RandyC</b></div><div>I'm quite aware of how the cap works and of Toronto's financial situation. It just makes very little sense why they would throw a bone to Anaheim when they can extract a better return. I could easily see it taking Anaheim's late first to move Kesler's contract in reality, not including getting Johnsson in return. In addition, I would think that Dubas and co would prefer to be dumping salary, not taking more on (LTIR or not).</div></div>
Personally I think you are overvaluing the inclusion of Kesler's contract. As long as the understanding is that he is on LTIR for the next 3 years and he won't return during that span, then throwing him on LTIR holds minimal value. I'm happy to remove him from the deal entirely. I just tossed it in as no-true-cost-to-Toronto incentive for Anaheim, given their less stable finances.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 56
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RandyC</b></div><div>Rightly so with Sandin, I don't see Dubas deals him for anything other than a top-2 d-man. There's just no point of the Ducks taking on Zaitsev's contract without getting a solid piece in return (and even more if Manson is involved). I'd take your original deal as well, but it seems bizarre to me why Toronto would want to take on Kesler's deal, especially for so little. Even with him on LTIR, I could still see taking much more to move his contract.</div></div>
Money is meaningless to Toronto. Our hockey team bleeds money and is owned by the two biggest telecom companies in Canada. Both of which own TV networks that show their games and generate a ridiculous amount of advertising revenue . The small amout of Kesler's money they would have to pay is a drop in the ocean to Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment. Since he is on LTIR, the cap hit disappears.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 46
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RandyC</b></div><div>While I like Zaitsev and think he could be serviceable playing sheltered/ 3rd pairing minutes, his contract makes him a negative value asset at this point; Toronto will need to sweeten the deal by adding more to even get trade talks off the ground. In addition, Manson + Ritchie >> Johnsson, so it would take much more to add Zaitsev to that deal. Think Manson + Ritchie for Zaitsev, Kapanen and Sandin or Liljegren as a starting point.</div></div>
I figured as much. Sandin is definitely off the table. He was the steal of the last half of that draft. I would expect him to get a call up half way through the season next year and take Rosen's spot. Liljegren being a RHD (and being expansion draft exempt) holds more value for the Leafs as well, he's playing big minutes on their farm team's Calder Cup run this year too. I'd rather hold on to Zaitsev in this case and try and dump his contract via the expansion draft. He seems to pair well enough with Muzzin. Certainly a big improvement over his pairing with Gardiner. I'm still willing to pull the trigger on the original trade (assuming of course Johnsson contract is going to be over 3.25M and Marner's cap pushes him out.)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 40
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheJoeMan</b></div><div>I'd be weary of acquiring Nick Ritchie. He might be the slowest skater in the league for someone his age. His hands are terrific and he's actually developed as a pretty good passer the last couple of years. But he'll be an absolutely anchor with the way Toronto attacks with speed. Also, Kesler isn't going anywhere. Even if his hip won't allow him to play he still has a full no-move clause and doesn't sound eager to waive it for any reason.</div></div>
Good to know on Ritchie. I've watched him play and he didn't seem that slow. But then again I am old enough to remember Jason Allison skating around in a Leafs jersey. I like his hands around the net, his board play, and of course his physicality (something the Leafs are completely lacking outside of Kadri). I think he puts up some points on the Leafs PP and helps Matthews play a little more physical when he knows he has some backup on his line (he played more to his size when Hyman was on his LW). Leafs happen to have some great skating coaches on their development team too... they got (or is it goat) Freddy Gauthier to be a mobile NHL option.
With regards to Kesler, if he's "retiring" to LTIR then it doesn't matter where his paycheck is coming from as long as he gets it (ask Horton or Clarkson). He can live in Anaheim and walk around the beach with a cane and still get paid.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 33
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RandyC</b></div><div>I'd do this in a heartbeat as a Ducks fan, but it seems highly improbable; that probably isn't enough to dump Kesler's contract, and getting Johnsson back is too good to be true. If anything, it would be the other way around, with the Ducks taking on whatever cap they can (think Zaitsev packaged with a pick or two).</div></div>
Well this only goes down if Kesler is "retiring" to LTIR, as is the rumor. He lives on the Leafs LTIR instead of the Ducks and they pickup the tab on any insurance related costs for the next 3 years. It is a minimal value add for the Ducks in this case.
I am interested if there is a package involving Zaitsev and Johnsson that could net the Leafs a similar return from the Ducks and potentially free-up that cap space for a Zaitsev upgrade. Something around Zaitsev + Johnsson for Manson + Ritchie as a base to get it started?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 28
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>joshelkin</b></div><div>I don't think the Mayfield deal is unreasonable. It's one of the better trades I've seen on here involving the Isles and Leafs. I would like to see the 3rd potentially become a 2nd if JHS reaches a certain number of points though. He's a lottery ticket but I honestly think he is very skilled. Just hasn't gotten a fair shake here.</div></div>
Thanks, glad to see I'm not completely off-base on value from the other side.
JHS is certainly a lottery ticket, that's why I included him. With the right support he could still turn into something similar to Kap (at least with offensive production), even if the chances are slim. He's not likely to make the Isles and he won't clear waivers so he doesn't add that much value to the trade. I'd be willing to let the 4th become a 3rd if he hit 15 goals or 45 points. Though we don't have the 4th in 2020, so some other shenanigans would be required.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 21
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>save a little money! for 3 years I think you can bump that down to 9. At most 9.616.</div></div>
I always err on the high side on here with Marner, lest I receive a thousand posts saying "Marner will get more". If the shave about a million off it just means they likely carry 3 scratches instead of 2 or try and acquire a slight upgrade on 4C (perhaps an aging vet on a prove it/discount contract like Brassard, Spezza, Kruger).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 18
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I don't like the Ritchie-Johnsson trade from Toronto's point of view. (I can tell because I <strong>love</strong> it from Anaheim's POV.) Johnsson is a better player already than Ritchie and has a higher upside. I don't see how the modest cap benefit is sufficient to overcome that gap.</div></div>
I'm not all that hot on it either, however when you consider that Ritchie is younger and plays a traditionally late blooming role as a PWF (think Wilson WSH, Ferlund CGY/CAR, Andersen CBJ), it isn't that horrible a gamble (especially with the 2nd included). I think his presence and physicality takes a lot of pressure off of Kadri to be the sole provider of that element on this team as well. Maybe even keeps him available in the first round next season.
In an ideal world, we would sign everyone and be happy. Unfortunately, the cap is a thing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 14
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SDSUFRATMAN</b></div><div>Only if Kesler goes on Ltir is the only way this works and he has to promise he will stay on it haha</div></div>
Yes, the word is he plans to "retire" (which means stay on LTIR in this case), which is why I added him in. Leafs are just paying the insurance difference and any other associated costs for Anaheim.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mai 2019 à 15 h 12
Sujet:
Cap Motivated Trades ANA NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Marner will be a UFA after this deal.</div></div>
Whoops, thought I had set that to 3 years... lets just pretend that is a 3. Thanks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mai 2019 à 16 h 25
Sujet:
The Marleau Solution
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Philvr</b></div><div>Marleau probably disagrees to retire but if we get him to agree to waive his NTC then Ottawa can buy him out and we can sign him to a league min contract, unless ottawa can’t actually buy him out after July 1.</div></div>
Sadly due to the CBA, the buyout and resign is not likely an option. Certainly not with Ottawa as to buy him out prior to the start of next season Marleau would have needed to be on their roster at the trade deadline. Now if they took a player to arbitration and settled, they would be able to buy him out in the summer if he was acquired before July 1 (I think), but that would be before the July 1 bonus was paid by Leafs, Ottawa isn't eating 4+ M in salary, especially in a lump sum cash bonus. This is a scenario I explored 6 months or so ago. Seemed like the perfect solution, until the CBA came knocking. The only way that works is if Toronto gets a rich team to bite on that deal (i.e. NYR), which likely involves losing picks/prospects/etc.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mai 2019 à 16 h 18
Sujet:
The Marleau Solution
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BigA1076</b></div><div>Ottawa would never go out of their way to help Toronto.</div></div>
History begs to differ. See: Dion Phaneuf trade. Also, this helps out Ottawa as well as the Leafs - this is a mutually beneficial deal. One team saves money and gets help reaching the cap floor. One team gets cap some cap relief.
The only limiting factor to a trade like this would be Marleau not wanting to leave (and possibly Ottawa's nut job owner being spiteful).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mai 2019 à 16 h 14
Sujet:
The Marleau Solution
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BootBoi</b></div><div>A creative effort, but ALL leave fans have 2 employ fantasy logic 2 make their cap woes disappear.
Sorry, leaves will have 2 trade assets 2 sign youngsters.
Hope they NEVER trade Nylander..-~</div></div>
Who are the Leaves? I'm only a fan of grammatically incorrect teams like the Leafs.
I'm not sure how this is fantasy logic any more than trading Clarkson for Horton was "fantasy" logic. It is a trade that benefits both teams - one financially, one with cap space.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mai 2019 à 16 h 12
Sujet:
The Marleau Solution
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JayTea</b></div><div>Pretty sure the buyout window closes on June 30th.</div></div>
This solution does not involve a buy out of any kind.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars 2019 à 16 h 25
Sujet:
Kapanen trade and Zaitsev option
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ajp_18</b></div><div>I don’t think Columbus would make that trade tbh. Nash is playing pretty good with Dubinsky right now and both are good in our own zone as defensive forwards. Plus we look to have enough cap that we don’t need to move him. On the other hand I would like to give Zaitzev a try at a 3rd pair RHD, just not at 4.6 for like 5 years.... I’d rather take another pick the the Russian prospect(even though I don’t know who it is).</div></div>
Good to get some perspective on the Zaitsev flip from a CLB fan. Thanks for that. For the Leafs, it only works if the full cap of Zaitsev comes off their books. To be clear, he isn't a horrible player and pure cap dump like most try to label him. He's just an overpaid 4D that can't fit in Toronto due to their cap situation. His offense dried up after his rookie season, but he can give you 18 solid minutes a night as long as you don't ask him to do too much and pair him with a good puck mover. There's a chance he could rediscover his 30-35 point output from his rookie season too.
The Russian prospect was the 31st overall pick in 2016. A bit of a flyer taken at the time, but the Leafs scouts seemed to really believe in him. I think staying in Russia rather than coming over to the AHL hurt his development, but he still has a lot of the raw tools and some size. He plans to come to North America this year. He'd be a top line AHL player on the Leafs, on a team lacking wing depth he might be able to crack an NHL bottom 6 off the bat.
Is it possible that with some additional picks 3rd round or later and some B prospects it might entice CLB? It might give them the option of trading Savard for a forward upgrade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars 2019 à 14 h 29
Sujet:
Kapanen trade and Zaitsev option
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MG1986</b></div><div>Justin Faulk is not an upgrade as far as our defense is concerned, and in my personal opinion, he is not a very good defender.</div></div>
Personal opinions, are personal opinions. However, the opinions of most who have watched Faulk play this year have indicated that he has made strides in his game, especially defensively. If I am choosing between a 38 yer old Ron Hainsey or keeping Zaitsev and his contract, or taking a 1 year gamble on Faulk to play at least as well as one of Zaitsev/Hainsey in the top 4, I take it.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MG1986</b></div><div>The Leafs could have had in the offseason and at the deadline and chose against it. Why would they suddenly do it?</div></div>
I'm not sure if you have a source on this to indicate that the Leafs could have made this same deal last summer or at the TDL this year, but Faulk last year was not the same player he has been this year. His value was at an all-time low. He's bounced back and has shown he can be more - a better defender and good puck mover. As for the TDL, moving out Kapanen and Brown at the TDL this year for Faulk wouldn't have made sense. The Leafs can use those 2 forwards this year and adding Faulk at the deadline to (at the time) Reilly, Gardiner, Muzzin, Dermott, Hainsey and Zaitsev would only mean that Zaisev would be a 4.5M scratch replaced by Faulk at the expense of Brown and Kapanen. Not to mention that at the TDL Carolina decided to stand pat and keep Ferlund to try and make the playoffs, doubtful they would start trading away roster players. Making this trade in the off season when we will likely need to choose between signing Kapanen (whom we have Bracco to replace at 3RW) or Johnsson (who we don't have a top 9 replacement replacement for) simply makes more sense.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MG1986</b></div><div>As for Adam Fox, it is a complicated situation, but I would agree with <a href="/users/palhal" target="_blank">@palhal</a> that unless the Leafs are getting a signed, sealed and delivered Adam Fox, this deal is a complete non-starter. Besides, why lose Kapanen when the Leafs could sign him for free after next season? </div></div>
Yes, it should only be done if Fox agress to sign in Toronto. However, the cap situation means that signing both Kapanen and Johnsson is not possible unless Marleau retires and agrees to be traded to a cap floor team before announcing (unlikely) or they trade away Zaitsev's contract with a large sweetener and replace him with a rookie D like Lilgeren or worse Holl. I think exchanging an asset like Kapanen from a position of strength for 2 players at a position of weakness makes more sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars 2019 à 14 h 14
Sujet:
Kapanen trade and Zaitsev option
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>This post is something different for sure. Only a signed Fox the would the Leafs do the deal. Good creativity TML GM</div></div>
Thanks palhal. And yes, this would be for a signed/deal in place with Fox. I will update the post to include that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 nov. 2018 à 16 h 50
Sujet:
Nylander deal options - 8 7 6 5 and 3 years
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>I really hate to break this to you, but you did all that work for nothing. Here’s how you calculate cap hit. Take the total amount of money he makes, divide it by the number of years. Done. Bonuses don’t matter, salary per year doesn’t matter, the cap hit doesn’t fluctuate at all. Average annual value = cap hit. For this year, if he signs, tack on 30k per day after the season started until the day he signed, which is a rule that avoids teams having a cap savings because of a player sitting out.
Sorry</div></div>
No need to be sorry, the numbers are salary not cap in my post. The cap is static at 6.824M in years 2-8. In the first year of the deal because of the late signing the cap it much higher if you load up year 1. This is a well publicized cap loophole. See here: <a href="https://www.tsn.ca/mckenzie-signing-bonus-would-diminish-leafs-cap-advantage-on-nylander-contract-1.1209609" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.tsn.ca/mckenzie-signing-bonus-would-diminish-leafs-cap-advantage-on-nylander-contract-1.1209609</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 nov. 2018 à 15 h 15
Sujet:
So many Nylander possibilities in one place
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>You really cherry picked the points on your "dealing from strength/weakness" list.
-New owner in Carolina. I'm sure making the playoffs would be great, but one would have to assume that he has no intention of overpaying to get a player.
-Sure they can score in bunches right now. Nobody has any doubt that the Leafs can score. Heck, they've even kept the puck out of their own net really well this year. The big question you should ask yourself though: "Am I comfortable with my D core when we hit the playoffs?" or, better yet, "Am I comfortable with the D that I have when it's the 3rd period of game 7 against Boston?".
-Carolina needs a center. They NEED a center. If I'm throwing a d-man out the door, I'm making sure it's for an impact player that plays up the middle.
You say Toronto doesn't NEED to trade Nylander, and you're spot on. But you're forgetting that the Canes also don't NEED to trade any of Pesce, Slavin, Hamilton or Faulk. And if they chose to move any of those guys, there'd be 25+ teams lined up to deal with them. Heck, one of them might even give them a guy that already signed.</div></div>
I wouldn't say I cherry picked those strengths/weaknesses, though you're welcome to expand the list or come up with your own.
Some of what you have listed here can also be turned around:
- New owner who promised results and a commitment to the team, rich dudes hate being embarrassed while losing money
- Leafs D has looked far better than past years to this point, even Gardiner isn't giving me panic attacks every game. Is it the ideal D, no. Is it something I sweat at playoff time? Not really, especially with Rielly's emergence and Dermott's growth. I'm more concerned with their lack of physical push back as a team than their D come playoff time.
- Not exactly a line up of teams offering high end young centers at this point of the season, that's more of a draft deal sort of play usually (if any are available)
And again, the point of this is that *IF* Carolina wants to trade Nylander, which of these options makes the most sense for them. I didn't say they needed him, it is if they think they need him and want to pull the trigger.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 nov. 2018 à 15 h 0
Sujet:
So many Nylander possibilities in one place
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>They would get an actual center capable of playing the top line role, aka someone like draisatl. Of the other three, option three would probably be the closest imo, but we all know how Carolina fans feel about adding to pesce for nylander</div></div>
Sure, though the Oilers aren't likely open to moving Draisatl, unless Carolina is willing to take back a big money contract like Lucic with the Canes still paying that premium price. Highly unlikely given the Carolina budget.
Carolina fans aside, I think something like 3 is the most likely result as well. Or some bastardized version of 3 and 2 with Pesce being the D coming back to Toronto.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 nov. 2018 à 14 h 52
Sujet:
So many Nylander possibilities in one place
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>Ya carolina wouldn't trade svech straight up for nylander so option 4 is terrible.</div></div>
I doubt that as well, though I threw it up as an option anyway to gauge opinion. It is possible that Carolina see Nylander as a C and place more value on him due to that. Of the other 3 options, which makes the most sense for Carolina in your opinion? (If they were to pull the trigger on one the options presented.)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 nov. 2018 à 16 h 34
Sujet:
How to fix the Marleau situation next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>I did and agm for ARZ at 82.5M salary cap, signed all of their RFAs to contracts between 1.2-1.4M Perlini to 3M and Panik is playing top 6 min so I gave him 3M and that leaves 8.5Mish in cap space. If you don’t think they re-sign Panik then adding a top 6 fwd will cost at least 5M so that brings it down to 6.5Mish left. Not enough to take the Marleau contract.
ARZ is going to want to make a serious run at the playoffs the next couple seasons with the way they’re set up. The young talent will no longer be “prospects” for lack of a better term. They’re in it this season. Next year will be a big year in becoming true contenders and I don’t see how taking 6.25M in dead cap space helps them.
As for comparing the trade to the Orpik trade, COL wanted Grubuaer so WSH made them take Orpik. This trade ARZ doesn’t want anything, TOR does. TOR wants cap space.</div></div>
You and I have very different views on how ARZ operates so I don't think we'll find common ground. But the team I linked includes the 6.25M from Marleau as a 35+ buyout and there is ample cap for a team that isn't going to compete seriously for at least a season or two and doesn't have the cash to spend. And every team wants 2nd round draft picks, especially when they are essentially free.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 nov. 2018 à 16 h 27
Sujet:
ARZ with a Marleau buyout
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Price_is_the_goat</b></div><div>there is no cap benefit by buying out a 35 plus player. read the FAQ link i sent you</div></div>
I know that, but I don't think you're following how this works. The full cap from the buyout stays on ARZ who can absorb it, not Toronto. Read through the comments and you might get a better idea.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 nov. 2018 à 16 h 18
Sujet:
ARZ with a Marleau buyout
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Price_is_the_goat</b></div><div>nmc, ntc. why waive it???? he wants to play hockey. he left the sharks to play in toronto. and he wants to retire here.</div></div>
Because he is coming right back, never plays in ARZ - please read the linked team details.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com