SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

StLHockey

Membre depuis
22 avr. 2018
Équipe favorite
Blues de St-Louis
Messages dans les forums
676
Messages par jour
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GM8 mars à 23 h 54
Sujet: Summer Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>I remember making trades for him a year and a half ago. Probably over 10. He's exactly what the Leafs need and the Blues are not a contender so I think both sides should be able to find a deal that'll benefit both.</div></div>

So you've been making them for about 18 months, and this AGM here is the sum of all you've learned in that time? Really?

Nobody gives a rat's fat ass what the Leafs need, I hate to break it to you. All teams have their own plans (except apparently San Jose). And if this is the best you can offer, you're just a glutton for punishment.

The offer, like clockwork, is laughable garbage. You've even had multiple Leafs fans telling you this on multiple AGMs. I'm also fairly certain you've made far more valuable offers for Parayko than this embarrassment before now. So everyone tells you no 100 times and explains exactly why 20 times (because gosh who wants to keep repeating the same thing over and over to a brick wall?), and your chosen path is to play hardball. Becaaaaause... what? That's ever worked before?

The Leafs are not getting Parayko. It's not happening. You cannot wish it into existence. Let it go already. Break your chains. Be free. Acceptance is the only way forward.
Forum: Armchair-GM8 mars à 3 h 53
Forum: Armchair-GM6 mars à 22 h 21
Forum: Armchair-GM4 mars à 12 h 11
Sujet: my idea for a tdl and offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Necas had 71 points last year, that's actually more than Buch had... stop it. Buchnevich's career high is 76, and Necas is already showing that he'll challenge that. With Buch's injury concerns, no reason to trade the more productive and younger player. You keep Buchnevich if the ask is Necas because no one is giving you a younger, more productive player for him!</div></div>


Buch had an injury last year, but I wouldn't say he is a player with Injury concerns. Also that said just because Necas had more raw points by virtue of playing more games probably doesnt make him a more productive player. Necas has never had a PPG season in his life and isn't nearly as good defensively as Buch. Buch has been PPG for all three seasons with the Blues and plays an all-around more impactful 200 ft game than Necas.

You can argue that for contract reasons you would rather keep Necas and I get that, but I don't know how you can pretend that Necas is a better player than Buch in a vacuum.
Forum: Armchair-GM4 mars à 12 h 19
Sujet: my idea for a tdl and offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Buch and Necas are both fine defensively. Not great but not bad. Necas is the better player. He's outscoring Buch, he's 5 years younger, cheaper, and better. Buch has 1 70 point season. Hard to call him a PPG winger when he's only come close once to the 82 point mark. Necas is hands down the better player, arguing against that right now is pure bias.</div></div>

You say that like it should just be taken as a fact.
1. Buch is among the best defensive wingers in the League. Necas barely plays PK minutes.
2. Name one season ever that Necas had a higher PPG than Buch
3. He is actually only 3 years younger
4. He isn't going to be cheaper soon, especially if Buch were acquired at retention.
5. Necas has had one 70 point season and regardless of games played Buch is PPG player and Necas has never reached PPG no matter how you spin
6. You are last person I want to hear about Bias from.
Forum: Armchair-GM29 févr. à 22 h 26
Sujet: wild moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>slater417</b></div><div>Im aware that its heavy retention. thats why its two top prospects plus the first. The only type of deal that nets both of those players is something for someone like Mcdavid. Thomas isnt even a top 10 center. He's a very good center, I'd even say he's elite, but the only reason for those two prospects would be the retention.</div></div>

What on Earth are you talking about, dude? Is this satire you're doing? Your "offer" does not come anywhere near paying for the retention you are NEVER getting from the Blues in a million years. Your "offer" does not come anywhere remotely near being enough for Thomas, who is untouchable. You genuinely imagine that one single low 1st is getting you an elite C who is locked down to a bargain contract until the next decade? Really?

Holy hell, man. Should we call you a doctor? You are either doing satire (a bit ham-fisted, even for this place), trolling or you've never watched hockey a day in your life. In fact, you may have just arrived on the planet this afternoon if this is meant to be serious comentary.