Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

Ryancnbb

Membre depuis
27 oct. 2019
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
3183
Messages par jour
4.14
Sujets de discussion
911
Biographie
Leafs fan
Forum: Armchair-GM31 oct. à 13 h 46
Forum: Armchair-GM24 oct. à 15 h 51
Sujet: leafs line I wanna see
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFanForSomeReason</b></div><div>Yep. I'll just regurgitate what I said in an earlier post that had very similar forward lines.

"I think this is the best option right now. I don't want to pile on the guy, and nothing that has gone wrong this season is his fault, but Ritchie is just not a piece that fits this puzzle. He doesn't fit the mold of a complimentary player that you want in the top 6 on this team, his defensive prowess and ability to breakout and get the puck moving up the ice isn't strong enough for that 3rd line, and there just isn't room on this team for a $2.5m 4th liner.

I know they want that 3rd line to look like Kerfoot-Kampf-Kase, but right now the top priority needs to be getting the top 6 clicking, and moving Kerfoot up is the best chance to do that at the moment. He's had chemistry with JT and Willy before, so even if you don't switch Nylander and Marner, there might be enough of a different feel to get it going.

At the end of the day, if you want this team to be able to play to it's potential, I think you have to move Ritchie."</div></div>

I agree 100%. it was a predictable mistake signing him.
Forum: Armchair-GM24 oct. à 14 h 42
Sujet: couldve been
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>draft_em_sign_em_trade_em</b></div><div>100% agree on Brooks, except it should have been Engvall waived, no team would want him because he is 1/2 million $ overpaid.

As for protecting 4 Dmen; Dubas so badly over rated Holl (and Dermott) but truth in fact, the Kraken would have passed on them, the amount of good Dmen that were exposed League wide, would have made the Kraken view them as a 7th-8th Dman.

N. Ritchie is another case of Dubas having tunnel vision (and being influenced by the stupid fans and media) just like when Dubas overpaid in the trade for N. Folingno (should have targeted J. Carter, playoff warrior and 1 extra season and far cheaper trade value; Carter looks great as a Pen). At least the tunnel vision to sign Bunting has been okay.</div></div>

could've waived both Amadio and Engvall and they wouldnt have been taken. if we would've protected 7 forwards then the kraken would either have taken Dermott or Holl cuz who else?
Forum: Armchair-GM30 sept. à 16 h 21