SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs are in a bit of trouble

Créé par: sens65
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 31 oct. 2021
Publié: 31 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
64 500 000 $
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $82 489 783 $212 500 $0 $10 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 21
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Seems like all they have to do is move one or two of the depth guys
sens65 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,160
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Holl will be gone, so that saves you a little more than $1 million to give to Sandin.

I just made an ACGM for the Leafs next year and it all can work itself out, even if you must buyout Ritchie because no one wants him.
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 25
#3
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,254
Mentions "j'aime": 636
They are.

They have to find teams willing to take on Kerfoot & Holl which is somewhat reasonable (not easy though), but Ritchie wouldn't be of interest to anyone. Then you have to assume Engvall and Sandin sign those lowball offers.
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 28
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,496
Mentions "j'aime": 22,665
Yes, the Leafs are in cap trouble....but so are a lot of teams. Doubt if the Leafs could even give away 2.5m Ritchie. Leafs won't be spending over 8m on goalies. Sandin and Liljegren won't be taking pay cuts.
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,160
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Quoting: palhal
Yes, the Leafs are in cap trouble....but so are a lot of teams. Doubt if the Leafs could even give away 2.5m Ritchie. Leafs won't be spending over 8m on goalies. Sandin and Liljegren won't be taking pay cuts.


Lilypad isn't in a position to ask for a raise, even by this season's end he'll still have less than 80 Nhl games played. Look towards a Dermott style 1 year deal.

And Mrazek and Ritchie were both awful signing by Dubas, a big swing and a miss.
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 39
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: palhal
Yes, the Leafs are in cap trouble....but so are a lot of teams. Doubt if the Leafs could even give away 2.5m Ritchie. Leafs won't be spending over 8m on goalies. Sandin and Liljegren won't be taking pay cuts.


There is the possibility Ritchie starts finding a groove and then his deal doesn't look bad. Considering he's only making 2.5, a big, hard hitting 30 point 15+ goal scorer isn't a bad contract.
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 46
#7
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
Bro, has anyone taken a look at Tamp Bay’s cap situation?

I understand they’ve already won but like their cap situation is just as bad.
31 oct. 2021 à 13 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,213
Mentions "j'aime": 744
ya I dont see this team being able to really get any better given the cap troubles. Holl and kerfy can be moved but that's a loss anyways
31 oct. 2021 à 14 h 16
#9
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: ZachHymanForTheHart
Bro, has anyone taken a look at Tamp Bay’s cap situation?

I understand they’ve already won but like their cap situation is just as bad.


The big take away from your comment me is, “already won”. If they Leafs even had a one long playoff run with this core I’d be happy. They won nothing and are handcuffed by the cap.
That Rielly contract is not going to age well
31 oct. 2021 à 14 h 20
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Seems like all they have to do is move one or two of the depth guys


Like Muzzin?
31 oct. 2021 à 14 h 24
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: GenXHockey
Like Muzzin?


Not sure that's the right move. Kerfoot is more likely
31 oct. 2021 à 14 h 38
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: MatthewsFan
The big take away from your comment me is, “already won”. If they Leafs even had a one long playoff run with this core I’d be happy. They won nothing and are handcuffed by the cap.
That Rielly contract is not going to age well


Imagine if Tampa or Washington decided to blow it all up 5 years into their build when they hadn't won the cup yet.
ZachHymanForTheHart a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2021 à 14 h 48
#13
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Imagine if Tampa or Washington decided to blow it all up 5 years into their build when they hadn't won the cup yet.


Not sure where you got blowing it up from. I just stated with Rielly’s deal kicking in next year the Leafs are in even more cap hell than before. At least now it’s really only been Kerfoot (3.5) Holl (2) Ritchie (2.5) that Leafs debate on which contract doesn’t hell them and if traded could free up cap.
For better or worse Rielly is going to be in the top 4 till 2027 (full NMC) and maybe in 2028 (10 team no trade list) they could move him. The cap is only going up by 1 mil till they hope 2025. You’ve got Campbell as your biggest FA this year. Matthews and Nylander in 2024. Then Tavares and Marner in 2025 when hopefully you see the escrow paid off and the cap jumps up a lot.
IMO I didn’t see the need to sign Morgan in season. Play this year out first. Jack Campbell should have been the priority first.
31 oct. 2021 à 14 h 51
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Not sure where you got blowing it up from. I just stated with Rielly’s deal kicking in next year the Leafs are in even more cap hell than before. At least now it’s really only been Kerfoot (3.5) Holl (2) Ritchie (2.5) that Leafs debate on which contract doesn’t hell them and if traded could free up cap.
For better or worse Rielly is going to be in the top 4 till 2027 (full NMC) and maybe in 2028 (10 team no trade list) they could move him. The cap is only going up by 1 mil till they hope 2025. You’ve got Campbell as your biggest FA this year. Matthews and Nylander in 2024. Then Tavares and Marner in 2025 when hopefully you see the escrow paid off and the cap jumps up a lot.
IMO I didn’t see the need to sign Morgan in season. Play this year out first. Jack Campbell should have been the priority first.


Both are priorities and the rest will be found elsewhere. Stars drive the boat. Having as many as TO has isn't the problem. Currently the worst contract on the team is Ritchie who won't look bad if he scores 15-20 goals or 30 points. Which absolutely can still happen. They can move what they need to to make it all work and keep finding cheap depth to fill in the blanks
31 oct. 2021 à 14 h 58
#15
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Both are priorities and the rest will be found elsewhere. Stars drive the boat. Having as many as TO has isn't the problem. Currently the worst contract on the team is Ritchie who won't look bad if he scores 15-20 goals or 30 points. Which absolutely can still happen. They can move what they need to to make it all work and keep finding cheap depth to fill in the blanks


Well for me always relying on barging reclamation projects year after year to fill in a roster is a terrible approach. It builds no continuity and is also a crap shoot.

My hope is the Marlies starting next year will start having guys pushing for spots on this roster. I wanna see this team succeed just as any other Leaf fan. But it’s getting extremely difficult to see this team win anything in a flat cap world.
31 oct. 2021 à 15 h 1
#16
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,967
Mentions "j'aime": 20,936
Quoting: palhal
Yes, the Leafs are in cap trouble....but so are a lot of teams. Doubt if the Leafs could even give away 2.5m Ritchie. Leafs won't be spending over 8m on goalies. Sandin and Liljegren won't be taking pay cuts.


Neither has Arb so basically GM has the advantage

Liligren probs gets what Peeke got in Columbus as both are rn in the same position 787,500k x 2 years. Sandin will probs either gets his QA on a 2 year deal or get a 1.55mill deal on a 3 year bridge.
31 oct. 2021 à 15 h 16
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Well for me always relying on barging reclamation projects year after year to fill in a roster is a terrible approach. It builds no continuity and is also a crap shoot.

My hope is the Marlies starting next year will start having guys pushing for spots on this roster. I wanna see this team succeed just as any other Leaf fan. But it’s getting extremely difficult to see this team win anything in a flat cap world.


TO is hardly alone in dealing with a flat cap. What they have that others do not have is a wealth of star players. Imagine being a team like the Islanders who have many 30+ year old players making 5+ million all of whom are likely to begin declining asap.
31 oct. 2021 à 15 h 24
#18
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
TO is hardly alone in dealing with a flat cap. What they have that others do not have is a wealth of star players. Imagine being a team like the Islanders who have many 30+ year old players making 5+ million all of whom are likely to begin declining asap.


NYI - lost in conference finals, lost in conference finals, lost conference semi finals last 3 years. That’s a bad comparison.

It’s true the Leafs are not the only team that has cap issues. They are however the ONLY team with 3 players making over 10 million aav. It’s a flawed roster construction in a cap world. We’ve got 3 more years of this I guess to see it will work
31 oct. 2021 à 15 h 50
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: MatthewsFan
NYI - lost in conference finals, lost in conference finals, lost conference semi finals last 3 years. That’s a bad comparison.

It’s true the Leafs are not the only team that has cap issues. They are however the ONLY team with 3 players making over 10 million aav. It’s a flawed roster construction in a cap world. We’ve got 3 more years of this I guess to see it will work


I guess we should fault management for not predicting a flat cap and global pandemic. Also I don't care what teams have won a round or two. You win the cup or you don't. The Islanders have won jack **** in my eyes.
31 oct. 2021 à 15 h 55
#20
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
I guess we should fault management for not predicting a flat cap and global pandemic. Also I don't care what teams have won a round or two. You win the cup or you don't. The Islanders have won jack **** in my eyes.


Of course not, they shouldn’t. But it’s unfortunately a reality and they are going to need to pivot from there approach.
If you are content with 1st round exits, that’s on you then. I’d gladly take multiple conference finals at lest then I’d now my team is making steps to the final goal 🤷‍♂️
31 oct. 2021 à 16 h 7
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Of course not, they shouldn’t. But it’s unfortunately a reality and they are going to need to pivot from there approach.
If you are content with 1st round exits, that’s on you then. I’d gladly take multiple conference finals at lest then I’d now my team is making steps to the final goal 🤷‍♂️


Barring ridiculous injury troubles, I fully expect this core to get past the first round. And beyond
31 oct. 2021 à 16 h 12
#22
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Barring ridiculous injury troubles, I fully expect this core to get past the first round. And beyond


I appreciate your optimism. Not sure where it comes from but I wish for that too
31 oct. 2021 à 16 h 57
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: MatthewsFan
I appreciate your optimism. Not sure where it comes from but I wish for that too


No matter what happens. Its going to be up to Matthews, Nylander, Marner and JT to win it all. Its not about the Coleman's or Goodwards or other 3rd liners. Its the stars
1 nov. 2021 à 10 h 5
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 15,029
Mentions "j'aime": 12,095
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
TO is hardly alone in dealing with a flat cap. What they have that others do not have is a wealth of star players. Imagine being a team like the Islanders who have many 30+ year old players making 5+ million all of whom are likely to begin declining asap.


Speaking of 30+ old players - both Muzzin + Brodie (33, 31 ) are signed for 3 more years at 5+ mill. They look like bottom pair defenseman this season and they’re supposed to be top 4 D. Good luck trying to move those contracts.

Then when you think it can’t get any worse, Dubas panics and gives a 29 year old defenseman an 8 year contract extension?!?! Rielly is a good #3 defenseman and he’s signed until he’s 36. It is soon going to be looked at in the same way as the doughty/Karlsson/Nurse contracts.

I couldn’t imagine my team having 3 albatross contracts on defense.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage