SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

OldNYIfan

Once a Kings Fan Too
Membre depuis
23 juin 2018
Équipe favorite
Ducks d'Anaheim
Deuxième équipe favorite
Kings de Los Angeles
Messages dans les forums
40345
Messages par jour
18.9
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 20 h 0
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LikeABoss</b></div><div>I was kinda guessing, not really a huge fan of Zegras but I love Gudas. I was going off a random article I found for a ballpark:

https://www.yardbarker.com/nhl/articles/what_would_be_the_potential_trade_value_of_trevor_zegras_to_the_canadiens/s1_17203_39928766

I figured Burger + Walman &gt; Farrell + Harris, and the picks are also comparable. From the Wing's perspective I was thinking Kane might be able to rekindle Zegras' game, but personally I wouldn't want Stevie to bet the farm on Zegras.

I was more focused on the Kane part, I read something about him wanting term, which Stevie has been averse to doing. Thanks for the feedback though!</div></div>

First mistake is thinking this article has any weight. Alot of these writers don't know **** about fcuk. None of the pieces mentioned in that article would likely have any interest to Anaheim other than slight add ons. Reference the Drysdale - Gauthier trade as reference. That's what Anaheim will be looking for, high end young assets not depth players and mid picks. Berggren wouldn't hold much value to them, they have other similar players, he isn't anything special. He is skilled and has shown potential and that's why we also shouldn't trade him. Ducks also currently have 5 left handed defensemen on the roster, Walman doesn't have any value to them.
Ferraro &gt; Walman is debatable but why do it? Walman plays well with Seider and is a good and cheap stop gap for Edvinsson. Why mess with that?
If Patrick Kane wants 5 years, we should stay far away. Could be still be good then? Sure. But the risk is much higher than the reward. Will it suck to see him play elsewhere? Yes. If he doesn't want to sign a reasonable deal then let him walk, it's not worth the cap implications of the future. Chicago wouldn't be trading for him either.
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 19 h 42
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 17 h 59
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 17 h 54
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 19 h 15