PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
9
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Matthews34
Membre depuis
21 juin 2016
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
429
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juill. 2019 à 21 h 2
Sujet:
Now is when we should sign Gardiner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Captain_Koivu_</b></div><div>(But he wouldn't specify) means they have nonthing, no offers what so ever.
He just try to get some talk going for his player.</div></div>
I like how we're supposed to take your word for it but not someone whose covering the game for a living?......... Just stop, this is embarrassing. This is borderline trolling an you know it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2019 à 6 h 4
Sujet:
Thank You Marleau
He is moving there because his family is heading out west. But yeah, he is a team guy. Legend of the sport.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 mai 2019 à 17 h 7
Sujet:
Hey Mitch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>Great! So then we're on the same page? Leafs will make trades before July 1st, and will not be backed into this magical corner where Dubas wakes up one morning and says "oh no, I forgot to clear enough cap space to deal with a potential Marner offersheet"</div></div>
Teams can also spend up to 10 percent above the cap and have to be cap compliant once final roster is issued, therefore even with Gorton on the books that gives the Leafs 16 mill to play with
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mai 2019 à 15 h 40
Sujet:
Nylander is not getting traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>This is the truth as well. I don't see them moving his deal and most fans are best off making their teams assuming the same.</div></div>
I get your point but this is Armchair GM. The creator of the team is the GM and does as he pleases. I can understand getting miffed about trade value, but everyone is fair game in a mock team. Maybe not everyone. Marleau is a whole different scenario because he’s basically the GM of his future, not the creator of the mock team. ****ing Lou.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mai 2019 à 14 h 58
Sujet:
Nylander is not getting traded
Couldn’t agree more.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mai 2019 à 14 h 53
Sujet:
Nylander is not getting traded
Thank you. Neither is Marleau. Can we move on????
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 mai 2019 à 20 h 31
Sujet:
Pionk to Toronto Vesey to Chicago Strome back to Edmonton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>I'd have zero issue signing him to a longer term 4/5 year deal around 3-3.5? I think although with question marks defensively, he could really flourish alongside a guy like Muzzin. Maybe a 1/2 year bridge to get past the Marleau deal makes more sense though. Am I off base at all?</div></div>
that'd be pretty good. he played with Marc freaking Staal so maybe that could help him a ton. contract details are fair. Pionk would be a good fit in Toronto.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 mai 2019 à 0 h 40
Sujet:
Applying Suggestions
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>Fair enough take. Not having a 1st in consecutive years would suck. For me, I just think I'd rather deal the pick than one of Liljegren/Sandin. And I want to get that top pairing defenseman. I'd make the deal extension or not, then if not definitely try to get one done. Our window is wide open now, and I don't want to wait for our D prospects to develop (on average defensemen take a while to develop. Look at Rielly.) I think our prospect cupboard is full enough to do it. Barely, but full enough.</div></div>
Fair enough. I get the window is open and yes I would do it. Maybe have a condition 2nd and if not resigned or not reach points limit then no first
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 déc. 2018 à 16 h 32
Sujet:
Interesting Piet Proposal
I give the author Matthews34, five stars for creativity in this trade. If Pietrangelo is such as difference maker, and would propel the Leafs to to greater success....at least for two years then I appreciate the trade.
Then it's the subjective worth of Pietrangelo is worth to the Leafs, minus the assets it takes to get him. Certainly Blues fans think Pietangelo is a difference maker. I'm not so sure, 4 playoff round wins in 9 years
So the trade is really Pietrangelo and his upgrade over Zaitsev, at the cost of Kapanen and Liljegren. I certainly don't think it's worth it for the Leafs as now you have competent replacements for Kapanen and Liljegren who still years of NHL control for the teams that own them.
So, five stars for the thought and structure of the trade. As a Leaf fan, I don't think it's a "difference maker" deal for the Leafs.....but Pietrangelo's worth and the other players are subjective.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 sept. 2018 à 17 h 18
Sujet:
My Leafs Lines After 4 Pre-season Games
Good lineup. I think this is the one they should go with too. Would not mind seeing Ennis and Leivo rotate.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 sept. 2018 à 1 h 39
Sujet:
My Leafs Lines After 4 Pre-season Games
Poor leivo.... can we just trade this guy to a team where he can get some ice? I feel horrible the has been so loyal and very dependable on the ice filling in.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 sept. 2018 à 15 h 35
Sujet:
Crazy Concept - The Leafs HAVE enough defensemen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DJSums17</b></div><div>I didn't say it's not an issue right now but the prospects can definitely fill the holes. How old was Doughty, Muzzin, Martinez, Voynov when they won the cup? What about Keith, Seabrook, Hjalmarsson, etc on Hawks? Letang and Shultz... that's about it for Pens... lol</div></div>
I just get the logic that a this magic # 1 Dmen is the solution to the Leafs problems and will lead to instant success. I think you proved my point when you mentioned the Kings and Hawks. They had good depth on defence which helped make their team successful. Generally team with better players have more success. Now that there core has slipped even Doughty hasn't helped the Kings since they last won the Cup in 2012. I don't think they have won a playoff round.
Take the Capitals last year, Leaf had a better GAA, so it's not like the Leafs are dmen desperate. What's with "lol" comment?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2018 à 18 h 2
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
ok, so lots of good points and some I will never, and I'm not alone, agree with.
First, these metrics some love to reference are only good in addition to traditional evaluation. Not as the core decision making factor. Since phillyja's reply only stating these metrics then its not wrong to assume this. Based on previous years of watching both players and based on traditional stats, Polak, to the leafs, has just as much value as gudas to philly. Yes Gudas is a better player, i can admit that. But at 3.3mil would he add that much more value to torontos line up. no chance!
As for advanced metrics, sure they can be valuable, but they can't be relied on. All the stats you state, with sanhiem, with carrick etc. These are variables. Theses stats are based on way to many variables to be completely relied upon and will change team to team. No stat can say some one like gudas will succeed on the leafs. Who's in net? whos gudas passing to? who's coaching him on what to do. So, no I don't believe these metrics are so valuable they should be the base of an argument, respect can only be lost if you ignore traditional evaluations. When you compare Gudas to DeHaan you also devalue advance metrics, its just ridiculous. Any GM valuing them the same would not have a job long.
Facts are facts, Polak is not as good as Gudas but he performed better than Gudas last year for the leafs than Gudas did for Philly, granted Polaks on a better team. Also, the leafs don't need Gudas, or Polak. Their propects and style of play prove this. Thats what i was implying with my first comment, if we need a player like gudas, we may as well stick with polak and keep the cap room.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2018 à 17 h 14
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buds16</b></div><div>You replied with advanced stats as proof? first pdo is luck, so your reply has no credibility. Real stats make your reply even less relevant.
Polak. 54 GP, 2G, 10A +5 46PIMS 0.22PPG 1 MILLION
Gudas . 70GP, 2G, 14A, 0+/- 83PIMS 0.23PPG 3,350,000 MILLION
WOW.</div></div>
yeah thats the point lol. PDO is luck and his was way below league average. That's why they always say never sell low on someone because of their PDO. Gudas is twice the player Polak is. It doesn't take advanced stats or "counting" stats to see it. We can use a method that both sides use in the eye test. Gudas is better easily. He comes with more baggage because of the suspensions, but he's a good payer that as of right now means too much to the team to move for a 2nd round pick. If it was for a player on TOR sure, but the draft picks have little value at this point for Philly, imo. Part of the reason he had a down year is because he's usually paired with a decent puck mover. He's had the best success being with Sanheim, Streit, Del Zotto, and Medvedev. For some reason Hak like to put Manning with him for extended periods of time and it never works out great.
5v5:
w/ Manning: CF% 51.52, CF%rel +1.87, xGF% 50.22 , xGF%rel -0.33
w/ Sanheim: CF% 57.11, CF%rel +7.48 , xGF% 56.87, xGF%rel +7.81
... so depending on how TOR utilizes him he'd be very effective. Pair him with a true puck mover and he could play on any pair and provide value. He didn't all of a sudden just turn bad. He makes his money by being one of the better dmen at preventing controlled entries into the zone. Last year he just stopped stepping up to people at the blue line after the suspensions which caused him to look worse than he was. it also doesn't help when he is paired with another guy like Manning.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2018 à 17 h 0
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>You aren't paying either of those guys to get points though. The issue with Polak is that he cannot move the puck and exit the zone. Can Gudas do that? Can he then be a physical presence and eat up minutes? Can he then penalty kill? I'm not going to pretend I watch Philly often, but my understanding is yes he can do all of the above effectively enough to be a #4D on this team.
That's my thought process anyway.</div></div>
he has an average passing ability, but the zone exit ability is why Flyers fans don't like him. I like him and wouldn't move him because Myers isn't going to crack the team and I'm not trying to watch Brennan or Willcox play if we hit the injury bug.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2018 à 13 h 35
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
Not sure I would accept this for Philadelphia. Radko Gudas has pretty solid underlying metrics and had some bad puck luck last season. Don't really have any incentive to move him as he is still a valuable asset to have on this team. I also think that his shot contributions are really underrated league-wide.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 août 2018 à 15 h 5
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
Why would we give up a 2nd for a more expensive Polak?
I dont think we need to give up anyyhing for another dman. If a deal that comes along, sure, but no need to force something. Our forwards are going to have the puck A LOT which will make our D look even better. Lets go into this season with who we have and force a young guy to prove he belongs!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 août 2018 à 14 h 40
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
Hes okay, still a solid third pairing guy and some PK time, but IMO not worth a second rounder and Philly has enough depth and prospects and massive cap space to fill that spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 août 2018 à 14 h 11
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>It's a good point because actually I'm a pretty big Carrick fan too and believe he would succeed in a bottom pairing role. What it comes down to for me is that Gudas brings a whole different element to our blueline that I don't believe Carrick or Oz possess. And while they COULD theoretically fill that role we're a contending team that at some point needs some stability back there and to not rely on an overseas signing or a bottom pairing D to take the next step.
But if we go into the season as we are at this point in time, see what Carrick/Oz have in camp, and a deal like this is still available mid-season? I think that's totally a viable option as well.</div></div>
Carrick and Ozhiganov are two comoletely different players.
Ozhiganov comes a red to Gudas:
Oz better skater, bigger body harder hitter, harder shot.
Gudas more experience in nhl
Gudas would be an alright fit for maybe 1 season but as it’s already been pointed out I don’t think they have the depth to let him go.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 août 2018 à 13 h 52
Sujet:
Leafs Cheap RHD Trade (PHI)
Seems good to me. I've been hoping Dubas would obtain a mid-level RD for some time, because I think that Hainsey is retiring, or at least not re-signing. Let's see what the Philly guys think.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2018 à 13 h 10
Sujet:
Leafs D Trade (TOR/MIN) + Depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoganOllivier</b></div><div>He's a above average 2nd pairing defenceman. He's good but he's still a spare part. He's not the stud blueliner who is the envy of other teams. He's a good defencemen with a right shot. If he was left handed, we aren't even mentioning him here. Don't get me wrong though, he's a very valuable player. He just isn't enough of a step up that it makes sense to make the trade you mentioned above.
He'd improve the defence a couple points but when you factor in the lost production from Brown and the lost draft pick, then the trade isn't a positive gain overall for Toronto.
That's my point, the proposed trade does not end with an overall increase in talent on the Leafs.</div></div>
Spurgeon eats up 24 minutes a night, and has a positive CF% rel unlike both of Zaitsev and Brown. Spurgeon isn't a franchise D but he's a quality puck mover which is an asset the Leafs would very well use.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juill. 2018 à 13 h 1
Sujet:
Leafs D Trade (TOR/MIN) + Depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoganOllivier</b></div><div>As Spurgeon would be as well. This is a common theme on this site, people moving minor parts around for other minor parts. That is all fine and good but if you're moving 2 spare parts and a high draft pick for another spare part, why are you even bothering?
Trades should always improve the overall total state of the team. This trade improves the defence marginally and lowers the skill of the forwards and also uses up a future asset in the draft pick. There isn't a net benefit here.</div></div>
Spurgeon is a quality top pairing defenseman not a spare part.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mai 2018 à 21 h 48
Sujet:
2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs AKA "There's Probably A Reason I'm Not A GM"
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>I get it. I just have a hard time using who is at the helm of a franchise as the reason why they can easily get killed in a deal. I promise if Larsson was only going to cost that much he'd have been gone a long time ago. To get them thinking on that deal the pick should probably be our 1st. Even then it doesn't make a ton of sense when you factor in the direction of their team. I think you need a little more quality and a little less quantity in these deals. Respect the effort and ability to realize maybe the values aren't perfect though :)</div></div>
TBH I thought that the pick should be higher after I posted, but I decided to just leave it standing with a note at the end.
Anyway, your opinion is noted and filed for next time. I'm definitely having another go at this.
Cheers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mai 2018 à 16 h 6
Sujet:
Leafs 2018-19 (RHD Trade w WPG)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthews34</b></div><div>All fair points. We'll have to get a better look at Grundstrom before throwing him to the top line. Don't know how confident I am in that. I personally just really like the idea of Nylander/Kapanen. I believe they'd work well together and they've done it in the past.</div></div>
The reason I put Grundtrom on the top. He is a pro of the SHL and AHL. Maybe he can do the Hyman job on that line. And he is playing with two veterans....Matthews and Marner. Hyman become the digger with speedster Nylander and Johnson. That was my thought. But when the players are playing well they are kinda interchangeable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 janv. 2018 à 14 h 24
Sujet:
Leafs New Lines?
I would actually prefer a chocolate sundae for Polak... over all good lines. Very solid
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com