PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
14
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Lsendel3
Membre depuis
17 févr. 2020
Équipe favorite
Sabres de Buffalo
Messages dans les forums
2123
Messages par jour
1.4
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 13 h 22
Sujet:
Make Buffalo Great
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Renegade_H</b></div><div>It feels like Buffalo is soon at an inflection point where players are ready for the role they are suppose to be in and there are no spots (ie Savoie, Peterka, Kulich, Ostlund...)</div></div>
Ostlund shot slot into 3C long term, a void recently left by Mitts. Peterka is a top 6 winger, along with Quinn Tuch and one of the prospects (assuming they can move on from Skinner, which isn’t likely). Kulich Benson should be middle sixers, leaving a middle six spot available. Greenway shows flashes but no one will be sad when he’s gone. Getting a TK should be the priority, but those guys are rarely moved. After that it’s fight for your spot, that should be the top 9.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 13 h 13
Sujet:
Make Buffalo Great
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Renegade_H</b></div><div>Enjoy purgatory forever.</div></div>
Joke
You
As far as the moves, they’re fine, other teams would probably dislike them more. Can’t see JG taking a fair/mild under payment to play in Buffalo tbh. No to Kulikov, was already a suck player here once. Just play Johnson in that spot. And Peterka on the fourth line is… well, interesting
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 12 h 51
Sujet:
Make Buffalo Great
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Renegade_H</b></div><div>I call it a win if I can get 4 comments deep without someone being visibly upset.</div></div>
This is all garbage and you should feel like garbage.
Sorry.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 18 h 16
Sujet:
After the collapse
You’re right, Buffalo isn’t touching that with a ten foot pole
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 17 h 8
Sujet:
Playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>A team loading up on playoff depth, grit, and experience is way different than trading for RFA rights.
Exactly what do you think you're going to get for these guys? Krebs is a reclamation project at this point.
OP, to answer your question of where Krebs fits, Pittsburgh, Boston, any team with a weak prospect system that has a spot in their bottom 6 to let him figure stuff out. Hell, maybe offer him to Colorado for Colton.</div></div>
I said they should be part of a bigger package. Not sold off as individual parts. Krebs as a solid defensive player probably holds late second round valueish when applied to a larger deal. And Joki a RHD which always gets traded for over value. Selling off at the lowest value possible is just bad business. And yeah, I’ve seen plenty of LAK proposals of a Turcotte swap or like you mentioned a Colton swap.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 15 h 24
Sujet:
Playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NucksnOilers</b></div><div>What room is there for either of them? Krebs doesn't have any room in the middle 6 at all and Jokiharju doesn't have any room in the bottom 4. Both of these guys are going to be RFA's and teams will know Buffalo has no space for either of them so why would they pay top dollar when they can just wait for them to be on open market? Krebs just isn't good enough to be a 3C on a playoff contending team like the Sabers want to be (Adams job might depend on it) so he won't fit there and there needs to be room for Johnson so play so Jokiharju won't have a spot either</div></div>
But even when there isn’t room with organizations, teams still seem to get appropriate value for their assets. A team would have to pay that price as they both are decent enough assets that there will be more than 1 suitor for each. They each can be a secondary piece within a bigger trade, not useless picks. ****, the corpse of Eric Johnson just pulled a 4th and he’s significantly worse than Joki, like in every way possible except for that one time he got dragged into a SC win with the Avs. Add in both play premium positions, selling low just doesn’t make sense
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 avr. à 10 h 34
Sujet:
Flames
Resigning the suck sisters should be a firable offense for KA. If he resigns one, fine, don’t like it but fine. Both and he should be handed walking papers. And doing so just to dump Krebs at his lowest value seems foolish.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 16 h 22
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div><strong>Yeah, comps matter on cap dumps and depth defensemen. </strong>You are trying to cram two very different situations into the same hole, but it don't fit.
- Guentzel was a TDL UFA being shopped around. Buch has a full season and he is not available, but Army will listen in case anyone wants to blow him away. They are plotting extension talks. Already we have wildly different scenarios.
- Pittsburgh is in a totally different situation with regards to right now. They want to maintain a shot at competing with Sid and Geno and Letang and EK, so Bunting was a solid get for them. It would not be one for the Blues.
- Similarly, the Pens have a nearly barren prospect pool, whereas the Blues are about top 10, depending on who you ask. The Pens clearly went for some organizational depth for the future, the Blues would not be doing that (nor would they agree to spread the value across six pieces or whatever). They'd want specific types of players at specific positions who are closer to ready if possible, and two, maybe three pieces tops.
There's no simple check the other trade comp to be made here with Guentzel, or most anyone else you could bring up.</div></div>
They matter on more than that, but that’s fine, I’m not going to round and round. If Pitt wanted to keep the window with Sid there open, trading Guentzel should have been the last thing they did, imo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 16 h 11
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>176 eh? Heh. Not even the Americans are claiming that high.</div></div>
Check Dobber, the people that actually update things like that. Or Elite Prospects. And it is 174, my bad
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 16 h 9
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>What Guentzel fetched is irrelevant. On pretty much all the levels.</div></div>
Agree to disagree. Players being traded are compared all the time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 16 h 8
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>I said he played less than 100%. Never said he missed a ton of games. :)</div></div>
Show me where I said he missed a ton games vs just games. But I can show you that Rosen is 176 lbs now, not “155 soaking wet” like you said earlier
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 16 h 0
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>I think a bag of pucks is a bit of an undersell of what exactly they got. Bunting isn't really all that bloated of a contract. It's a 2 and a half year committment at a very fair hit for his production. He's not a driver but it's an extremely similar contract and situation to Saad where he's a relatively affordable source of 20+goals and 50 points or so while being a pretty reliable player. Sure it's probably not something you could move freely, but you could say the same about almost every 2nd/3rd line veteran in the league. While those players aren't necessarily your core players, almost every Cup winning team has a good deal of them spread throughout their rosters.
Ponomorav hasn't really lit the world on fire but he's probably capable of being an NHL player next year and possibly having an impact. Koivunen is probably a year after that, and Cruz Lucius also has a pretty good chance as well. It's not the sexy return that we all like to shoot for. But lets face it. Not every "Top" prospect who is 3-4 years out or recently drafted pans out. Most dont. Sure there's a chance that they do and their impact will most likely exceed the guys that are lower rated, but getting alot of cost controlled roster players is what Pittsburgh preferred. And in all honesty, Bunting included, they'll probably get 3 out of that trade alone.</div></div>
O come on now. It was and is a **** return. Spin it however you want, most likely they sold their last chance with Sid to win anything for more than likely 3rd line guys in 3 years. I remember the O’Reilly trade, Blues fans were thumping their chests pretty loudly and rightfully so. And for 4 years it looked like Buffalo would have had 1.5 seasons of Vlad to show for ROR. I know I’m jumping from trade to trade here, but I can tell you from talking with Pittsburgh fans, they’ve accepted they got basically nothing and like you said a hard to move 2nd/3rd liner.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 15 h 56
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Like I said, he played the first 9-10 games clearly not at 100%, and since regaining full fitness is back up around PPG. It also did not help anyone that the power play was allergic to PPG for the first few months. But hey, if you want to place that much importance on 10 games out of 221, so be it. He has 212 points in those Blues games, at a rate like 33% higher than his Rangers production. That's a rather curious path to get to so much concern about him already falling off from old age. If you don't want him, cool, but it doesn't change the fact that he's not a market item. Someone would need to compel Army (who is already talking up an extension) to come off him. This is not some TDL UFA who everyone knows is being shopped around because they gotta get something decent for him tout de suite.
Also, <strong>Buch has missed a grand total of two games this season, so I'm not sure what that's about.</strong></div></div>
You’re the one playing up the injury. And awesome, he should probably be resigned with the Blues.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 15 h 28
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>Truthfully I wouldn't be shocked if they did. I would be very happy if they could get him at 8.5 for 5 years. The situation is worth discussing though as we're in a position where we're probably not going to be extremely competitive for the next 2 years or so. So i can't really imagine the front office making a long-term commitment to a guy that will sign when he's juts turning 30.
Your initial post wasn't geared towards a Buffalo stand point. It was posted in general about the player.
I'd agree that the injury history is probably the only red flag in the players profile. But given he hasn't had any significant injuries it's not a lingering thing.
Buffalo probably isn't the best team for this conversation anyways. I'd imagine Buch would probably have them on his NTC. But this is the exact type of forward the Sabres need to look in to. They have all of the offensive talent in the world but don't have any responsibility in their forward group in terms of two-way play.</div></div>
Fair enough. I do tend to always look at it through Buffalo’s standpoint, as that’s who I cheer for, and should clarify as such. I’m curious to see what he ends up getting, I know he can play center, but is better suited as a winger, so that may stunt the return. We just watched Guentzel get a bag of pucks and a conditional second, along with Pitt taking Bunting’s bloated contract. If a GM views him as a center, that would vastly improve the return. Otherwise, history has taught that GMs always seems to get a “deal” on wingers. He would be a great addition to Buffalo, but it truly would only be a year as he’d dip after next season, so just not worth what it would take unless they got that deal, which remains to be seen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 15 h 9
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>If you want to cherry pick this season and exclude the last two seasons, and also overlook that he's being tasked on our PK1 and PP1 and that he's playing on a team that has no secondary scoring and his and Thomas scoring both dropped off when they weren't paired with eachother sure it's very easy to argue that he hasn't grown much. Also if you want to look at a move that most of the fanbase of the Rangers have deemed is a horrible blunder as a price point sure. Or if you want to also overlook that there was a premium put on Blais fresh off of a Stanley Cup being a young physical player who had some scoring ability sure.
If you want to live in reality though it's very hard to not realize that this is a player that play drives and plays a reliable two-way game and has the versatility to play almost every position as a forward and also scores at a first line rate while doing so.</div></div>
🤷♂️
The Blues should probably keep and extend him at 8.5 x 5 years or so then.
I’m thinking strictly from Buffalo’s vantage point. He’s not going to resign in Buffalo, at least not for the Jeff Skinner treatment of holy overpay. So I’m not going to give significant assets for him. Along with the red flags I’ve mentioned (turning 29, injured multiple years in a row) I’ll leave it at that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 15 h 5
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Production slowly dropping year over year? What? He started the season playing hurt, since then he's back to his regular Blues pace. Not sure what you're on about ther.</div></div>
Yeah, dropping from over a ppg to under .8 ppg is concerning no? Add in 2 separate seasons of missing time due to injuries, turning 29, and the acquiring team having one season at 5.8 then most likely having to pay him significant dollars to keep him. Again, I’m not someone who really wants to acquire him so I’m the wrong target here. But I also don’t think he’s going to pull a ton due to these red flags. Maybe I’ll be wrong.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 14 h 57
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StDetroitBlueWings</b></div><div>He was not necessarily wanted by anyone at the time cause teams weren't truly aware of the kind of player he is. Clearly you're part of that group that isn't aware of his true value.
Need to give up quality to get quality. Kulich may be too much, but you're not going to get him for cheap if that's what your goal is.</div></div>
I don’t necessarily want him due to needing a new contract after this year, along with his production slowly dropping year over year, coming into his age 29 season. If Buffalo is going to spend high end assets, they should target guys with term imo.
And I don’t buy no one wanted him. He was near a ppg player his last season in NY. Wingers rarely get a sizeable return, we see it time and time again, reinhart was traded for a late first and Levi (who took major strides post trade).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 14 h 44
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BDHockey</b></div><div>What about Ostlund, Samuellson as the main pieces?</div></div>
I go back to this question I’ve posed a few times. Has Buch value vastly improved when he was traded for a 2nd and a warm body. In some aspects, absolutely, in others not so much. His output has improved (although this year it’s gone back to around the same as his last year in NY) he’s going to be 29 instead of 25. He’ll need a new, larger contract instead of the pre negotiated one with the blues. Very tough to argue he’s grown that much, imo, in value. Just my opinion though, and I’m sure there are blues fans that see it differently
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 14 h 29
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StDetroitBlueWings</b></div><div>Unlikely, but what about Kulich?</div></div>
That’s not happening
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 avr. à 14 h 21
Sujet:
trade with buff
Want substance? Try substance.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 avr. à 15 h 22
Sujet:
3 way deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BadaBing</b></div><div>Sabres can keep PLD in this trade and send the HABS way Dylan Couzens. Then we have a deal</div></div>
Still hungover from Easter I see
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 19 h 41
Sujet:
Offseason
Rationale: you have too many forward projected players. Let’s trade one of the better ones for multiple lesser ones.
You didn’t think about this much did you
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 13 h 54
Sujet:
Hronek
Buffalo doesn’t consider this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 mars à 11 h 46
Sujet:
Canes Next Year Keeping Guentzel Moving Necas
JJP is on a similar trajectory as Necas, so think Buffalo would pass. Necas is better, and I feel the gap may be worth the first in a vacuum this year, but projecting out will close. Add in Necas needs a larger contract and JJP will be cheaper, along with that first being relatively high, can’t see Buffalo doing that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 mars à 12 h 49
Sujet:
Draft day move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Onlyfairtrades1</b></div><div>Buffalo needs to add Tuch.</div></div>
More like Dahlin, Tage, Tuch, 25 and 26 first, amirite.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com