PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
2
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Hockey_Hippy
Membre depuis
15 avr. 2020
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
353
Messages par jour
0.2
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 mars à 18 h 58
Sujet:
24-25 Leafs Look Ahead I
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SydBarrett</b></div><div>Pens already have depth forwards so they don't need to give up a potentially very high first to help toronto shed salary lol . and they could very very easily sign similar players in free agency without giving up ANY picks.
Topi may be a good piece but if the pens are moving a first any time soon it is for established young nhl talent. Topi is not that. He is already 22 and has one season of pro experience in north america. Not one single game in the NHL. To claim the leafs right side is deeper than the pens is utterly laughable.
if you want that high first then you can give up something of tangible value. like knies. Even then the pens may say no thank you.</div></div>
Who is your 3RHD?
I suspect the Leafs sign back Lyubushkin.
Rielly/Liljegren
McCabe/Lyubushkin
Benoit/Timmins
Are Letang and Karlsson better than Liljegren and Lyubushkin? Offensively they certainly are. Not defensively. And who is it you have after them that is better than Timmins, signed for another year for 1.1 btw?
Also, Topi Niemela turned 22...on Monday.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 mars à 18 h 54
Sujet:
24-25 Leafs Look Ahead I
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>PIT doesn't have their 2025 1st round pick at this time. San Jose does. So might have to try them for this package.</div></div>
A future 1st would work just as well
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 mars à 18 h 53
Sujet:
24-25 Leafs Look Ahead I
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>If Niemela is as good as you say, the Leafs should keep him. Cheap RHDs with years of control are hard to find.
Bertuzzi for six years, seems like too much term.</div></div>
The only reason I put him in there is the emergence of William Villeneuve who is more in line with what Treliving likes in terms of reach and has arguably caught up to Niemela in terms of development but is a year behind. If not for him, Niemela is never in this package.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars à 12 h 32
Sujet:
Leafs Opening Night 24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>carter_mackenzie24</b></div><div>Yep Pittsburgh is going to trade a 1st for a former 3rd, 4th, Undrafted 24 year old and a overpaid 4th line centre</div></div>
They will; for these ones. The surest giveaway that someone has no idea what they are talking about is when they start rating prospects by their draft pedigree a year or more past their draft date.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 févr. à 22 h 2
Sujet:
The Over the Hill Gang All Players 35 or older
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Claesson4Norris</b></div><div>That 1st line would still be a top 5 line in the league</div></div>
Had a hard time with the blueline though, hence buying big on Bob.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 févr. à 12 h 25
Sujet:
Leafs Deadline 23-24 II
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CouldBeKoi</b></div><div>Not trying to be disrespectful or mean or anything of the sort but truly the Kraken would decline that so fast. Steeves and Villeneuve are not good prospects and a 3rd is nothing. Brodie is purely a camp dumb to make it work and provides no value. Larsson has one more year after this still under contract so they have no need deal him now, especially for such a weak package. Larsson is better than other D-men who have grabbed a first at a deadline ( Chiarot, Savard etc.) so he will command at the least that, considering the extra year as well. Also almost the entire Kraken roster is depth so even if you think Steeves is good they still don't even need him.</div></div>
Not trying to be disrespectful, but you haven't watched them play and I have. I watch on average 8 to 10 games a week of Leaf prospects. I know what they have down there far more than some dude who talks to someone who has talked to someone and tells a story like it is their idea. It just turned noon here. Since last night I've watched Moldenhauer, Malinowski, Grebyonkin, and Chadwick. I've still got a pair of Marlie games ready to go, another Malinowski, a Minten/Lisowsky/Chadwick, a Moldenhauer and the Leafs tonight.
Villeneuve is a year and a half away and I stated that but he's got talent and just needs runway.
As I understand it, Seattle depends on an attack that is so spread out you basically run out of defenders. They are losing three of those forwards from it in a matter of months (Eberle, Wennburg, Tatar). That's why they'd want Steeves. That guy is ready now. You put him with people who can play, he will produce. You put him on your fourth line he will give you an honest night's work, hit and defend. He is on Toronto in October if he is not traded.
And everyone under the sun acknowledges that both Savard and Chairot were overpays. Be that as it may, a 1st from Toronto is likely mid 20's. That's a 3 year development curve on a player you are not even sure pans out. Steeves is already there.
After three years draft pedigree looks good on a hockey card and that is it. Either the dude can play or he can't. It is folly to grade prospects on that basis, yet all of your 'experts', those 'experts' who do not actually watch games beyond a couple tournaments a year, consistently do so.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. à 12 h 26
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 25-26 IV
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Victor24</b></div><div>Maybe. I really don't know prospects. I just don't see many prospects for 1sts trades in the NHL.</div></div>
But again, you are not getting one player for that pick. You are getting a pair of players who have overshot their draft slot, Niemela by a considerable margin. I mean could you raise the protection to Top 10 from Top 5, sure, not a deal breaker there.
Keep in mind that after a couple years draft pedigree looks good on a hockey card and that's about it. The player needs to develop. Look at current Marlie Kieffer Bellows. Son of a good hockey player, he is a former 1st rounder who is on, what, his 3rd organization now having never really stuck. I've watched him a lot this year. He is no threat to make the Leafs despite the point totals because the rest of his game has not developed.
Robertson, now that he is finally healthy, is starting top get his legs under him at the pro level. And Niemela will be a suitable heir as a PP QB for Pittsburgh.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 janv. à 16 h 58
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 25-26 IV
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Victor24</b></div><div>Also, the Pens likely won't trade a 1st for Robertson who has failed to establish himself and in 1.5 years will either be a dependable middle 6 guy (who Tor would keep) or be non-tendered / traded for futures. No 1sts.</div></div>
You are not trading a 1st for Robertson. If anything Robertson is the lesser light (marginally) of this deal, but that is primarily a positional thing given Niemela is a RHD who is .67 points/game as a 21 year old in the minors. You're going to need someone after Letang and Karlsson. He is a hell of a good candidate.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 janv. à 16 h 52
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 25-26 IV
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Victor24</b></div><div>Based on his stats and age, Draisaitl probably wants 13MM per. More than Marner, less than Matthews.
Also, I know Tavares is a Tor guy, but he is still a PPG player, why would he sign that deal? He could probably get double that on the open market.
So giving Tavares 2MM more per and Draisaitl 1.5MM more, you're over by 1.3MM with 6 rookie contacts.
Also, why is Knies taking that contract? If he is playing top line minutes with Matthews, he is going to be a multiple year 20 goal scorer. He would want at least 3MM per with the cap going up so much.
To me, all of your UFAs (minus Marner) are underpaid.</div></div>
OK. To me, I did everything right and allowed for a bit of wiggle room.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. à 23 h 13
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 25-26 IV
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Victor24</b></div><div>Why would Draisaitl take that? You're asking him to take a pay cut but not Marner?</div></div>
3 mil raise is not a pay cut. Further, there is 2 mil in wiggle room under the cap if there needs to be a little more added.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 janv. à 19 h 55
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 2526 III
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brgh4life</b></div><div>We don't need another LD. That's one thing we have in the system.</div></div>
Could easily sub in Ty Voit for Kokkonen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 janv. à 16 h 37
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 2526 III
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brgh4life</b></div><div>I would love to see Topi learn behind Letang and Karlsson, but he will be stuck behind them until 2027. Too high a price for a guy who won't be able to shine. Pens would be better off using that for a young forward.</div></div>
You're not just getting Topi there, you're also getting Kokkonen. He's been doing quite well for Toronto this year. It is likely any forward you get with a mid first round pick in 2026 (remember it is top 10 protected with 2027 rollover as indicated in the notes) is three years away, so you are looking at 2029 before you get any returns on that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 janv. à 16 h 33
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 2526 III
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Seems like so many think the Leafs should be noticeable older with long term contracts.
Knies is better than 2.2m, and I imagine you've underpaid other Leafs RFAs.</div></div>
2 year term. He has plenty of time to increase that before he is UFA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 janv. à 16 h 31
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 2526 III
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CoachCoach</b></div><div>I would assume Copp and Compher will be just fine in that role in 2 years, so no room for Kampf.</div></div>
Placeholder trade, they'll get a 4th from someone for him who needs him for that purpose. But yeah, so long as they play all two minutes, you got no worries.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 janv. à 9 h 23
Sujet:
Leafs Look Ahead 24-25 IV
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>In Nylander's entire career minus this season, what had he done to warrant this cap hit? Let's just come back to earth</div></div>
Funny how no one said that about Tage Thompson's deal.
Nylander was badly underpaid in his last deal and is making up for lost time. I can't blame him for that. He still comes in under the other two. I've got Marner making 12.5 over 6 next season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 déc. 2023 à 14 h 35
Sujet:
Playoff Reinforcements 2324
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Markstrom is 34 before the deadline. Which means the devils would be getting him at age 34, 35, and 36.
An extension on Hanifin at UFA prices doesn’t add value. He’s a pending UFA. Making him a rental.</div></div>
Ok, so we can go around and around this bush forever. I say "I would not make this proposal unless Hanifan is signed to an extension" then you say "This proposal sucks because Hanifan is not signed to an extension."
Markstrom's birthday is Jan/31. That means he plays 4 months as a 33 year old and 2 and a little bit as a 34 year old.
Get a life dude.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 21 h 25
Sujet:
Playoff Reinforcements 2324
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Markstrom is 34 years old and has 2 more years after this one.
In the last decade just 1 goalie has played at a above average level through their age 34, 35, 36 seasons, while maintaining a starters workload. That was mike smith. And even in that stretch he wasn't a top 10 goalie (which is what markstroms cap hit would require him to be).
Even best case scenario for markstrom, where he plays at a level that no other goalie has from 34-36, he's still probably only just barely worth his contract that we could probably replace with a UFA
Worst case scenario he falls off like 95% of goalies at this age and we're stuck with 12 million that can't be moved bc he has a full NMC and destroys our current window, and our future window bc we gave up all these assets.
Meier was an RFA. Which meant we controlled his rights.
Hanifin is a UFA, which means we wouldn't. They are not comparable</div></div>
I've always been of the opinion that 95% of your goalies play as well as the team in front of them defends. I think New Jersey, especially adding Hanifan to Hamilton on the top pairing going forward and backing that up with a pairing of Siegenthaler/Marino (or Nemec eventually) plus Ruff as the coach would be better than what Calgary is putting out there currently. That said, I think he is simply better than Vanecek. Given the latter's age, if he was going to approach Markstrom's level of consistency and usage, he would have done so by now. Beyond that he has 2 years left after this one and he is 33. This means his deal ends after 35, not 36.
I do not think there is a goalie out there you could sign for less that would give you as much. I think there are several that could give you Vanecek, but you've seen what he can do. It's not enough.
And again, when I proposed this trade it was with the assumption that the Devils sign Hanifan to an extension. I do not propose this deal otherwise. That you keep bringing this up as a reason to flag it after I have twice now pointed out the misrepresentation of what I am proposing is telling.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 21 h 17
Sujet:
Playoff Reinforcements 2324
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pretzelcoatl</b></div><div>The Devils, the team represented by this post</div></div>
I'll agree to disagree
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 11 h 58
Sujet:
Playoff Reinforcements 2324
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pretzelcoatl</b></div><div>These just make us worse</div></div>
Which us are you referring to? There are three teams here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 11 h 57
Sujet:
Playoff Reinforcements 2324
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>Markstrom > Campbell, No reason for Calgary to do this. Unless they go full rebuild mode.</div></div>
That's exactly what I expect they will do.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 11 h 54
Sujet:
Playoff Reinforcements 2324
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>No to all of that
Bahl>Broberg
Markstrom at 6 mill is not a good idea. (actually 7 mill considering we eat 1 mill AAV on campbell).
Then 1 year of 5 mill hanifin for Holtz+1+2. That's a holtz too much on that alone</div></div>
Markstrom is one year removed from the Vezina finals. When a team plays defense in front of him he is fine. *As I mentioned* in the additional notes, I'm assuming you sign Hanifan to an extension. That makes the price worth paying as it is roughly comparable to the Meier deal. Hanifan on an extension plus Siegenthaler and Hughes makes Bahl irrelevant. Broberg plays both sides but needs a reboot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 déc. 2023 à 18 h 12
Sujet:
Leafs Blueline Upgrade 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vols94</b></div><div>so a UFA, 2 4th liners and a B prospect for a D man signed long term and STL gets the right to add a second. Uh NO</div></div>
I'd caution you not to make a call on a prospect you have not seen play. By your comment, it is obvious you have not.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 déc. 2023 à 18 h 10
Sujet:
Leafs Blueline Upgrade 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>You can see how that’s completely counterproductive then no? And how this trade isn’t appealing at all from a Blues fan point of view? We’re trading our only good defenseman at actual defense for a glut of players who could possibly be middle of the lineup players but not for certain (which mind you we have a boat load of those already) just because they’re younger. So we’re getting worse and attaching a high draft pick in order to do so.</div></div>
Bottom line: I think the Blues need to blow that team up. This is a team that is not a guarantee to make the playoffs year on year that is only getting older. I happen to think that Niemela is more than a middle of the lineup player and Holmberg while not a line driver, can be a complementary top 6 at the pro level. Abruzzese *could* get there as well, but it would be more of a surprise. You might not agree with the assessment of those players but I believe you are basing that assessment on second hand information and not the actual viewing of those players in games. I do not venture an opinion on a prospect unless I *have* watched them several times.
Niemela I see as another Faulk who has been a first pairing guy in the past. I compared Holmberg to a heavier Jarnkrok, but if you are not as familiar enough with him think Ivan Barbashev. I stand by those calls. Scouting reports that have not been updated since a player's draft year do not trump actually watching the players play.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 déc. 2023 à 22 h 19
Sujet:
Leafs Blueline Upgrade 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>Parayko is thrown out there nearly 70% of the time on d zone starts. Mind you in almost strictly matchup usage.
It’s not overly comparable. Nor should it be they’re different players and in much different circumstances.
By every account from the front office they are very happy with Paraykos play as recently as Armstrong’s presser yesterday.
I’m not entirely opposed to your argument of them needing to undergo a heavier turnover than expected. But that turnover has to start with the Krugs or Faulk, otherwise it’s not really worthwhile.
Parayko is the absolute pillar of our defense. He’s the only defenseman that can comfortably play in our own end, that’s including his partner who is completely in over his head.
Forgive me for being pessimistic in regards to those 3 prospects. But we’re currently going through the tollercosster of not overly impressive at anything defenseman who are average sized but produced at lower tiers or earlier in their careers.
Depth and more specifically, bottom end depth and youth isn’t our issue.
I don’t foresee any of those guys being short term or long term fixes for what we need.
And as much as guys like to complain about Paraykos contract. With the cap going up? What do you expect to happen to UFA contracts? 5.5-7 is going to be close to the going rate for 2nd pair defenseman.
This doesn’t even factor in adding a 2nd into the deal for no particular reason. But we move Parayko and I can assure you that 2nd is in the 30s. And it will for many more years to come.</div></div>
I don't disagree that Faulk and Krug would also be a part of that turnover, likely Leddy too. And St. Louis would probably find takers for all of them somewhere. Just not Toronto. They aren't what the Leafs are looking for.
The 2nd is in there because you are getting three players that will play for you within the year, and not just a cup of coffee, and not garbage time. PLus the fact that the Leafs take the whole hit on the salary.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 déc. 2023 à 20 h 23
Sujet:
Leafs Blueline Upgrade 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>If tj brodie wasnt a leaf putting up numbers like he is, i wouldn't trade for him either, and he doesnt have a massive awful contract.
As far as parayko 'forcing' players to skate and skate, uh, he isnt doing that either because they still get massive amounts of shots through. If he blocks 2 out of every 6 shots he still lets 4 through (and he isnt blocking 1/3rd of the shots he faces).
The only way to look at this is that he is getting burried and he is incapable of digging himself out and he has been getting progressivly worse.
Throw in the fact that he's past prime age and by all accounts will only get worse, no he wont be fine.
Brodie is 3 years older and declining, so what is parayko gonna look like then?
Like, the leafs dont have a defensive structure or guy who can carry him so why would he look good there? Why would the leafs take on such a massive risky contract for a guy who cant even carry their 2nd pairing?</div></div>
What can I say? I think you are under estimating the Leafs ability to play a disciplined defensive structure and I think you are under estimating Parayko's ability to fit into one. You're not going to agree with me. I can see that. It is what it is.
We can keep going back and forth on this but why bother? Neither of us is going to convince the other of anything.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com