SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs Look Ahead 25-26 IV

Créé par: Hockey_Hippy
Équipe: 2025-26 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2024
Publié: 8 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The kids get the first shot, but Gregor and Lagesson remain should they stumble, plus you have 2 mil in cap room. Draistaitl more than replaces the production of a 35 year old Tavares in the middle allowing him to slide to the left. Rasmus Anderson is a UFA the following year and the Leafs will have the wherewithal to sign him if needed.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
21 200 000 $
2900 000 $
21 000 000 $
22 200 000 $
2900 000 $
13 500 000 $
2900 000 $
1900 000 $
11 000 000 $
1900 000 $
21 500 000 $
2900 000 $
22 400 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
612 500 000 $
35 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
611 500 000 $
24 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Dubas is familiar with both of these prospects and knows what they bring to the table. They'll both play for Pittsburgh. The 1st would be Top 5 protected and rolled over into 2027 if too high.
PIT
  1. Niemelä, Topi
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
Détails additionnels:
The Leafs are in their window of contention now and they have the cap space to strengthen their lineup which makes breaking in a young defenseman an iffy proposition. The better bet is to re-load the pipeline. With Tavares sliding to the left, there is one less vacancy on that side. Robertson is the odd man out.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
This is a placeholder trade. If not the Caps then another team.

Solid veteran penalty killer/defensive presence to shield the youth on a re-building team, plus youth to help with said re-build is worth a delayed 3rd.

(I expect the Caps will go full re-build after Ovie breaks the record and retires)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de WSH
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2292 000 000 $89 768 334 $0 $0 $2 231 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
816 667 $816 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
851 667 $851 667 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 janv. à 18 h 34
#1
boltsfan71
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 696
just never happens
SomeonesOffended et CouldBeKoi a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 21 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Why would Draisaitl take that? You're asking him to take a pay cut but not Marner?
CouldBeKoi a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 22 h 59
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,466
Mentions "j'aime": 620
Ya no lmao
CouldBeKoi a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 23 h 13
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 356
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: Victor24
Why would Draisaitl take that? You're asking him to take a pay cut but not Marner?


3 mil raise is not a pay cut. Further, there is 2 mil in wiggle room under the cap if there needs to be a little more added.
9 janv. à 0 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Quoting: Hockey_Hippy
3 mil raise is not a pay cut. Further, there is 2 mil in wiggle room under the cap if there needs to be a little more added.


Based on his stats and age, Draisaitl probably wants 13MM per. More than Marner, less than Matthews.

Also, I know Tavares is a Tor guy, but he is still a PPG player, why would he sign that deal? He could probably get double that on the open market.

So giving Tavares 2MM more per and Draisaitl 1.5MM more, you're over by 1.3MM with 6 rookie contacts.

Also, why is Knies taking that contract? If he is playing top line minutes with Matthews, he is going to be a multiple year 20 goal scorer. He would want at least 3MM per with the cap going up so much.

To me, all of your UFAs (minus Marner) are underpaid.
CouldBeKoi a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 0 h 6
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Also, the Pens likely won't trade a 1st for Robertson who has failed to establish himself and in 1.5 years will either be a dependable middle 6 guy (who Tor would keep) or be non-tendered / traded for futures. No 1sts.
CouldBeKoi a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 16 h 52
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 356
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: Victor24
Based on his stats and age, Draisaitl probably wants 13MM per. More than Marner, less than Matthews.

Also, I know Tavares is a Tor guy, but he is still a PPG player, why would he sign that deal? He could probably get double that on the open market.

So giving Tavares 2MM more per and Draisaitl 1.5MM more, you're over by 1.3MM with 6 rookie contacts.

Also, why is Knies taking that contract? If he is playing top line minutes with Matthews, he is going to be a multiple year 20 goal scorer. He would want at least 3MM per with the cap going up so much.

To me, all of your UFAs (minus Marner) are underpaid.


OK. To me, I did everything right and allowed for a bit of wiggle room.
Victor24 a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 16 h 58
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 356
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: Victor24
Also, the Pens likely won't trade a 1st for Robertson who has failed to establish himself and in 1.5 years will either be a dependable middle 6 guy (who Tor would keep) or be non-tendered / traded for futures. No 1sts.


You are not trading a 1st for Robertson. If anything Robertson is the lesser light (marginally) of this deal, but that is primarily a positional thing given Niemela is a RHD who is .67 points/game as a 21 year old in the minors. You're going to need someone after Letang and Karlsson. He is a hell of a good candidate.
9 janv. à 17 h 18
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Quoting: Hockey_Hippy
OK. To me, I did everything right and allowed for a bit of wiggle room.


That's fair. Your opinion isn't wrong, I just don't agree. All good. smile
Hockey_Hippy a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 17 h 21
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Quoting: Hockey_Hippy
You are not trading a 1st for Robertson. If anything Robertson is the lesser light (marginally) of this deal, but that is primarily a positional thing given Niemela is a RHD who is .67 points/game as a 21 year old in the minors. You're going to need someone after Letang and Karlsson. He is a hell of a good candidate.


Maybe. I really don't know prospects. I just don't see many prospects for 1sts trades in the NHL.
10 janv. à 12 h 26
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 356
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: Victor24
Maybe. I really don't know prospects. I just don't see many prospects for 1sts trades in the NHL.


But again, you are not getting one player for that pick. You are getting a pair of players who have overshot their draft slot, Niemela by a considerable margin. I mean could you raise the protection to Top 10 from Top 5, sure, not a deal breaker there.

Keep in mind that after a couple years draft pedigree looks good on a hockey card and that's about it. The player needs to develop. Look at current Marlie Kieffer Bellows. Son of a good hockey player, he is a former 1st rounder who is on, what, his 3rd organization now having never really stuck. I've watched him a lot this year. He is no threat to make the Leafs despite the point totals because the rest of his game has not developed.

Robertson, now that he is finally healthy, is starting top get his legs under him at the pro level. And Niemela will be a suitable heir as a PP QB for Pittsburgh.
10 janv. à 14 h 56
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 2,813
Mentions "j'aime": 956
Quoting: Hockey_Hippy
But again, you are not getting one player for that pick. You are getting a pair of players who have overshot their draft slot, Niemela by a considerable margin. I mean could you raise the protection to Top 10 from Top 5, sure, not a deal breaker there.

Keep in mind that after a couple years draft pedigree looks good on a hockey card and that's about it. The player needs to develop. Look at current Marlie Kieffer Bellows. Son of a good hockey player, he is a former 1st rounder who is on, what, his 3rd organization now having never really stuck. I've watched him a lot this year. He is no threat to make the Leafs despite the point totals because the rest of his game has not developed.

Robertson, now that he is finally healthy, is starting top get his legs under him at the pro level. And Niemela will be a suitable heir as a PP QB for Pittsburgh.


You could be right. If the pick was top 10 protected, it could be a possibility. It really depends on how both would have developed in the year and a half from now.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage