SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

GMTD

Eichel Tower
Membre depuis
10 avr. 2017
Équipe favorite
Golden Knights de Vegas
Deuxième équipe favorite
Kraken de Seattle
Messages dans les forums
4716
Messages par jour
1.8
Forum: Armchair-GM9 déc. 2022 à 13 h 55
Forum: Armchair-GM7 déc. 2022 à 10 h 26
Forum: Armchair-GM6 déc. 2022 à 21 h 10
Forum: Armchair-GM7 déc. 2022 à 0 h 42
Forum: Armchair-GM7 déc. 2022 à 0 h 28
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kster34</b></div><div>You brought up chykrun - I was just pointing out Karlson is at a different level, so not sure what your point was. Agree 100%, SJ should move him, but not for that garbage offer. He is an elite player and elite players - with term and a reasonable cap (assuming retention as proposed) - get more than a late 1st + mid level prospect + cap dumps back.
And your argument about saving cap space makes no sense - if they are rebuilding, there is no urgency to move him for cap space</div></div>

I mentioned Chychrun because if the ask on Karlsson is a 1st+top prospect, they might as well pursue him, especially a cap-strapped team like EDM. They could then also add someone else with the remaining 3.75m like Patrick Kane or Jonathan Toews or a free agent next season. Karlsson is probably not having a larger impact than Chychrun and Kane or Toews combined.

Any team making an offer for Karlsson is probably offering a late 1st, so there really is no need to mention that, it's why there is the 2nd round pick too. Barrie is a good OFD (on pace for 50 pts) and sucks defensively but Karlsson is literally just an elite version of him, his cap hit isn't significant, so while he may have no value to SJ now, he is someone that they can move as a rental the following year. Puljujarvi is possibly a bust but he's an RFA up for an extension next year, he was a former 3rd OV pick so there's some upside there. They probably could get a B-level prospect too, but a GM who gives a top prospect and a current 1st for Karlsson at 8.35m or more would be the fool.

There's also the risk that Karlsson gets injured, he's been mediocre for years because of injuries. His history cannot be ignored. It's a very high risk move to acquire Karlsson, even if the reward is high.
Forum: Armchair-GM7 déc. 2022 à 0 h 18
Forum: Armchair-GM6 déc. 2022 à 23 h 54
Forum: Armchair-GM6 déc. 2022 à 23 h 48
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMBL</b></div><div>Let's call it 4.5 years at best.

If you look at it from a financial perspective:
Karlsson only has 2m in salaries left this year, his future salaries is 39m, if you ask me getting out of paying over 28m is great. SJ doesn't have much cap space, and the move frees up 8.35m. His contract is pretty much buyout proof since it doesn't save them much cap and would require the team to pay 2/3 of his contract too.

With Burns being traded already, and Karlsson and Meier being made available, SJ is probably headed into some sort of rebuild, whether it be a 2-3 year or 5 year remains to be seen, but how much is Karlsson going to be an asset to SJ if he's on their squad?

Yes, Karlsson is a Norris caliber dman, but do you think he's going to be a Norris caliber D-man for 4 more years? His NMC can become very problematic if he drops off especially at 11.5m, since he can't be sent to the minors either if he doesn't want to be there.

His NMC and large reduced cap hit are going to limit his destinations, so it will also limit the return.

Getting off that contract would not be a dumb move by Grier regardless of the return if the plan is to rebuild anyways. He probably can get more but he's not getting a team's 1st+top prospect. Anyone willing to pay that price will just pursue Chychrun. Both guys have a lengthy injury history, but Chychrun is 8 years younger, and carries a cap hit that is 45% less than the retained amount here. Plus, he doesn't have a NMC.</div></div>

If this particular trade happend I think they could resign Meier
Forum: Armchair-GM6 déc. 2022 à 23 h 46
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMBL</b></div><div>Let's call it 4.5 years at best.

If you look at it from a financial perspective:
Karlsson only has 2m in salaries thins year left, his future salaries is 39m, if you ask me getting out of paying over 28m is great. SJ doesn't have much cap space, and the move frees up 8.35m. His contract is pretty much buyout proof since it doesn't save them much cap and would require the team to pay 2/3 of his contract too.

With Burns being traded already, and Karlsson and Meier being made available, SJ is probably headed into some sort of rebuild, whether it be a 2-3 year or 5 year remains to be seen, but how much is Karlsson going to be an asset to SJ if he's on their squad?

Yes, Karlsson is a Norris caliber dman, but do you think he's going to be a Norris caliber D-man for 4 more years? His NMC can become very problematic if he drops off especially at 11.5m, since he can't be sent to the minors either if he doesn't want to be there.

His NMC and even reduced cap hit are going to limit his destinations, so it will also limit the return.

Getting off that contract would not be a dumb move by Grier regardless of the return if the plan is to rebuild anyways. He probably can get more but he's not getting a team's 1st+top prospect. Anyone willing to pay that price will just pursue Chychrun. Both guys have a lengthy injury history, but Chychrun is 8 years younger, and carries a cap hit that is 45% less than the retained amount here. Plus, he doesn't have a NMC.</div></div>

Erik Karlson has won and looks to be front runner this year to win Norris. Chykrun will never be at that level. Prior to his injury, there was an argument that he was top 3 player in the league and he looks to be getting back close to that level. He’s only 32; with that contract doubtful he can be moved without retention but that will cost you. Imo - he could be the most impactful player on the trade block this year (and he has term); the deal proposed above is garbage and no way SJ accepts that.
If that’s all it takes the Leafs should jump in with a better offer, we have bags of money &amp; cap space.
Forum: Armchair-GM6 déc. 2022 à 23 h 41
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kster34</b></div><div>Yes everyone should complain about the retention, come on now. If I were trading a Norris level dman (albeit on a crazy contract) and team wanted me to retain $3+M a year for 5 YEARS - you better be sending me value in return, and that ain’t value in return. SJ motivation is to move out salary and kickstart a rebuild - what is coming back that’ll help them take meaningful steps to do that? Send me your 1st &amp; top prospect (along with some cap flaunts on short term deals) or take off, eh. Even Grier is not dumb enough to take that deal.</div></div>

Let's call it 4.5 years at best.

If you look at it from a financial perspective:
Karlsson only has 2m in salaries left this year, his future salaries is 39m, if you ask me getting out of paying over 28m is great. SJ doesn't have much cap space, and the move frees up 8.35m (that's currently enough cap to sign an elite player). His contract is pretty much buyout proof since it doesn't save them much cap and would require the team to pay 2/3 of his contract too.

With Burns being traded already, and Karlsson and Meier being made available, SJ is probably headed into some sort of rebuild, whether it be a 2-3 year or 5 year remains to be seen, but how much is Karlsson going to be an asset to SJ if he's on their squad?

Yes, Karlsson is a Norris caliber dman, but do you think he's going to be a Norris caliber D-man for 4 more years? His NMC can become very problematic if he drops off especially at 11.5m, since he can't be sent to the minors either if he doesn't want to be there.

His NMC and large reduced cap hit are going to limit his destinations, so it will also limit the return.

Getting off that contract would not be a dumb move by Grier regardless of the return if the plan is to rebuild anyways. He probably can get more but he's not getting a team's 1st+top prospect. Anyone willing to pay that price will just pursue Chychrun. Both guys have a lengthy injury history, but Chychrun is 8 years younger, and carries a cap hit that is 45% less than the retained amount here. Plus, he doesn't have a NMC.
Forum: Armchair-GM6 déc. 2022 à 23 h 20