SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Danz_10

Knuckle Danz
Membre depuis
20 oct. 2019
Équipe favorite
Rangers de New York
Deuxième équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
311
Messages par jour
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GM22 févr. à 11 h 39
Forum: Armchair-GM2 févr. à 12 h 46
Sujet: Lets Talk About Sharky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Danz_10</b></div><div>I think you might have this wrong, as it seems like Sharangovich might be the player to build this around.

A young second liner with a fluid shot, who came from a skilled team is a solid asset. If they waited long enough on Zary, he's likely their top-line center. These players (Zary and Sharangovich) make a solid center duo, anchored by Backlund and Schwindt on the third and fourth lines.

To me (opinion), this says Calgary sees Kadri, Coleman, Markstrom and their potential UFAs on defense as their trade chips for a retool/rebuild with a fast transitioning. Adding a playmaker like Kuzmenko to Sharangovich might smooth things in the long-term.</div></div>

You're not wrong. Keeping him could be the best option.

Like <a href="/users/dgibb10" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@dgibb10</a> said, the problem is the Flames signed him to a 2 year deal. So it comes down to a value proposition. Do you trade him at deadline or offseason to get value out of him? Do you hold and see if he continues the success and then pay him a ton of money and over a longer term? or if you hold him and he has a down season next year, you let him walk, but in the mean time, you didn't get anything for him and had him take a roster spot from a younger player who might have been able to show something.

Who knows
Forum: Armchair-GM11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 50
Forum: Armchair-GM11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 54
Sujet: A shakeup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gmonwy</b></div><div>So you want to become the oilers? Good skaters but absolute **** goaltending? That doesn’t make sense</div></div>

As long as Benoit Allaire is employed by this organization we'll have no worries with goaltending. Dude single handedly revived Quick's career. Domingue who hadn't won a NHL game since January 2022 looked fantastic the other night. You don't need elite goaltending to win Cups, just above-average goaltending. In fact, trading Igor might benefit the Rangers in the long run, because the players will hopefully realize that they can't just play like **** and expect their world class goaltender to save them every night or drag them to wins. But I'd need at least one first round pick to trade Igor as well.
Forum: Armchair-GM15 juin 2023 à 14 h 10
Sujet: upgrading top 6 while leveraging cap
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyDanz</b></div><div>Suggestion:

Nix the Forbort and Henrique trades, Considering the need for more offense, I would prompt this offer instead:

CAR gets:

Panarin, Artemi (waives NMC, with $3,645,827 retained)
Goodrow, Barclay
Jones, Zachary

NYR gets:
Drury, Jack (following trade request)
Necas, Martin
Pesce, Brett

No adjustments needed to stabilize roster. At $8 million for three years, Panarin continues his pure offense with new goal scoring threats Aho and Svechnikov; Kotkaniemi and DeBrincat are joined by Goodrow's size and stability on the second line. Jarvis's opportunity to have center ice, comes on the third line, joined by Martinook and MacEachern. Jordan Staal and Stefan Noesen are joined by a prospect.

The shift of over $5 million dollars allows Waddell to maneuver as needed. Elevating Chatfield and Coghlan instead of trading them, sets up for future movement, while leaving Brind'Amour little to do in terms of dealing with turnover.</div></div>

You know, this is not bad. I don't hate it. And it pains me to say that to a Rangers fan, but It's not bad. Now I don't think anything this heavy would actually happen, but there's nothing wrong with this suggestion in general. It certainly is a nice break from the tiring Winnipeg trades.
Forum: Armchair-GM24 mars 2023 à 23 h 16
Sujet: NYR 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyDanz</b></div><div>Let me help you out in one word...Calgary. One thing is certain: the Flames are destined to make changes. With both Lewis and Lucic becoming UFAs, the Flames are going to lose its championship pedigree, a season after losing its star power. Youth will not necessarily be the way they go entirely; enter Barclay Goodrow.

With Blake Coleman being the lone Cup ranger, this could be a move Calgary wants in addition to permanence of Duehr, Pelletier and others on defense.



Proposal:

NYR: Goodrow, Barclay
CGY: Kylington, Oliver

On a one-year contract, Kylington helps the Rangers peel $1.1 million dollars off their cap in '23-24, along with the remainder of Goodrow's contract.

For Calgary, they are able to add a second Swiss army knife. The Rangers get a new offensive defenseman for one season paired with Schneider.

The cap savings avoids the buyout option.</div></div>


Don't see SJ as a good fit for Goodrow....but there should be a few teams (mostly those who fall short in playoffs) who realize what Goodrow can bring to their lineup. Maybe Calgary is one...can see Buffalo as another...how the playoffs pan out will have a lot to do with what teams can see themselves as benefiting from what Goodrow can give.
Forum: Armchair-GM2 mars 2022 à 0 h 54
Sujet: Something Different
<a href="/users/Shakabakes" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Shakabakes</a>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyDanz</b></div><div>Since I spent some time sharing the video and scouting of Lundkvist with the scouts who were working him up (during my previous time as a liason for Central Registry, via the NHLPA's insurance provider), I think it's fair to say I can see the ceiling on him.

Let me also say, that the 2018 draft class has the potential to be on the level of 2003 and 2005's classes. Time will tell.

As an aside, I suspect that a Dahlin-Lundkvist pairing isn't just about pairing a couple of Swedish kids; it's about the potential of taking the pressure off what has been a clearly overwhelmed Dahlin. While I'm sure Owen Power will eventually do that, helping this very talented young man (Dahlin) get closer to a comfortable, consistent game ought to
be opportune to the Sabres.

Anyway, I'm not interested in a pissing match. I liked the original idea of Krebs, which I stated to the original author. I thought [Thompson], because a future move that's about cost-cutting (I.e. Strome being allowed to leave as a UFA, supplanted by someone like Thompson, so it was preemptive in theory) in its way.</div></div> From your comment it appears we agree.
Thank you very much for your lengthy answer.
I have to laugh at how many Sabre ACGM who over rate their players.
It is obvious that Krebs for Lundqvist is a great idea for both teams that I am surprised this is the first post with this trade..
I believe each team is trading away an asset from a position of strength (Fox, Trouba, Schneider) and receiving an asset where it needs help.
This is a perfect trade for the Sabres, I hope it would be for the Rangers as well.

If I may be so bold, who you are to have been privileged to view the scouting videos.
I would have loved to have seen those.
Forum: Armchair-GM9 janv. 2021 à 0 h 13
Forum: Trade Machine Proposals22 juin 2020 à 12 h 50
Sujet: Eichel gets his college coach back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>YoucancallmeHockeyman</b></div><div>I appreciate your sound reply. I was hoping to achieve the stability your team desperately needs in a few ways:

1. By dealing the two draft picks, the Sabres can grab Askarov now, which sets up a future tandem with Georgiev. (As a Ranger fan, I think the Rangers knock off the Hurricanes, and places them as the higher draft slot).

2. Filling in the top two center spots is more cost-effective than having a cantankerous lone center and hoping someone will come along to fill in the other. Plus, if a CBO does arise, it's not hard to imagine that Okposo/Skinner is that candidate.

2a. With a bit more cash to work with, a certain defenseman currently in St. Louis and a left winger in Arizona could be in your locker room by the start of next season. And there will be something left over for Dahlin when his deal expiries, as more money can be freed up following the expansion draft.

It's important that stability does come to the Sabre organization.



Thank you. I didn't want to undercut my second favorite team. But, with a stud like Dach ready to go, the Hawks would be foolish to give Strome cash and keep Dach down.

That said, both Strome brother's being close to home in a place where minutes can be theirs, is just sense, IMO. They won't break the bank; they can continue to refine their careers. Stabilizing the Sabres' top six can reenergize them and the fan base. And as I mentioned, with money to spend, who knows what else they can do to balance out the team.

It seems to me that Eichel will want both a high-profile opportunity and a shot at winning. This isn't to sell Zibanejad short, but hey, Eichel is a franchise player. And, being reunited with David Quinn can only bring stability to this frustrated player.</div></div>

A thoughtful trader is rarely seen on here. Keep it up.
Forum: Armchair-GM19 mai 2020 à 13 h 57
Sujet: 3 way with Wild and Rangers
Strome has 18 G (goals) this season and last season with NYR had 18 G (in 7 less games). Compared to 15 A (assists) last season with NYR and 41 A this season. Yes, Strome has been helped this season by playing with Panarin. Comparing this year and last year the difference is statistically minus a G or 2 and plus 26A.

Last season Strome played mostly 3rd line center behind Zibanejad and Hayes and some RW. What I believe and what I believe the Rangers believe is that Strome is a solid 2 way center that could consistently put up 20 plus goals and about 20 A as a 3rd line center and if put with top line talent could be almost a point per game player. I believe your charts are also in agreement with this line of thinking.

Another reason Gorton is in no rush to trade Strome (unless it's an offer he can't refuse) and why he'd much rather sign Strome for 3-4 more years, is lineup depth. If at some point another center is acquired or Chytil and for example Andersson or Hendriksson become the 2-3 centers, Strome can easily move to RW and always move back to center is theirs an injury or if the young center(s) play drops off.

The Rangers do not have to trade Strome, especially after trading Skjei and they are very happy with how he's played 2nd and 3rd line center, as well as RW. So regardless of what your charts say or what others on this site and some NYR fans say... If Gorton trades Strome, the return package will have the value of a middle tiered 2 line center or Gorton won't trade him. Regardless of charts or others opinions.
Forum: Armchair-GM10 avr. 2020 à 14 h 27
Sujet: Id like this
Again...really underselling on Deangelo...I'm not sure why you're underrating your own player.

Would you say a 1st + Kravtsov would be enough to get Theodore from Vegas?

You'd probably say not even close. And you'd be right. But just as right to say this trade is not even close.

Over the past 2 seasons:

Deangelo = 2 pts/60. Theodore = 1.57 pts/60
Deangelo has 83 points in 129 games
Theodore has 83 points in 150 games

Might seem close....

then we look in the details:

Deangelo this year played 55% of Ranger PP minutes. Last year he only played 31.
Theodore this year played 70!% of Vegas PP minutes. Last year he played 48.

Deangelo is a top 10 transition dman in all of hockey. Here's where his offensive output ranks over the last 2 years:

<a href="https://imgbb.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/N9dCYVt/Screen-Shot-2020-04-10-at-2-26-07-PM.png" alt="Screen-Shot-2020-04-10-at-2-26-07-PM"></a>

Would a 1st + Krebs be enough for anyone on this list?

No it's not. Back to the drawing board.
Forum: Armchair-GM5 mars 2020 à 22 h 18
Forum: Armchair-GM5 mars 2020 à 22 h 17