SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Bricher33

Membre depuis
11 mars 2023
Équipe favorite
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Messages dans les forums
302
Messages par jour
0.7
Forum: Armchair-GM4 déc. 2023 à 10 h 23
Forum: Armchair-GM30 août 2023 à 9 h 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Random2152</b></div><div>Lol
If you want to know why I'm not being particularly engaging with you, one reason is because you assume that the 2025 pick is going to be a lotto pick.
2025. A pick I specifically slated out as a late pick.

If you (and that other poster) can't even get on the right page - there is no discussion to be had. So get off your high horse</div></div>
What you said is: "a (hopefully) late 1st" which is a scenario that I think the majority of people don't believe is likely as they have entirely too many strong teams ahead of them- which would strike me as the most likely impetus for making a trade such as this one. However, that's a fair counter as I set the tone by engaging with the implication that your assumptions were off-base. However, you're the one who chose to engage in a combative way so I'll stay on that particular "high horse" ;)

Since it seems you think I engaged in bad faith, allow me to reframe the questions earlier:

Could you elaborate on why a package of Johnson (~60pt season next year), Sillinger (what do you think is a reasonable expectation for him?), Boqvist/Mateychuk (would you prefer a package w/ Mateychuk?), and a 1st (let's cut right down the middle and say it ends up ~18 or 19, fair?) wouldn't be acceptable to you as a return for Petey (assuming another season of ~100pts) if he demanded a trade out of VAN? Are you of the mind that it would absolutely have to include Jiricek? To reject such a trade, you'd have to think they could get better from another team, in which case, what's an example of a better package you think VAN could get in such a situation?
Forum: Armchair-GM30 août 2023 à 7 h 15
Forum: Armchair-GM30 août 2023 à 6 h 39