PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
14
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
AC14
Membre depuis
23 déc. 2022
Équipe favorite
Blues de St-Louis
Messages dans les forums
2755
Messages par jour
5.6
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
19 avr. à 10 h 55
Sujet:
Hahahsnns
I can't see how the Blues wouldn't take this!! Matheson is a big strong, two-way defenseman who is a horse and can matchup against top competition and still move the puck out of the zone... right?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 23 h 3
Sujet:
Offseason
I truthfully don't think Roslovic is a better Center than Hayes is, no reason to sign him. Super no reason to sign Rakell, too much term and we have way too much youth that should be fighting for those wing positions this year and next.
It would be ideal however to find a very short term center that could potentially play 2C in the event that one of our young guys does not push for a spot out of camp there.
Also, there's no reason Perunovich himself should expect to ask for a 3x3. Injury concerns alone are going to make it hard for him to expect much term. I'd bet he'll get about a year at around 1m, i wouldn't be terribly surprised if the Blues didn't qualify him though if they can't move on from Krug and can find a way to bring in a younger defenseman that has much more ability on the defensive end.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 15 h 25
Sujet:
Big Deal with ST Louis
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BDHockey</b></div><div>The spinning is actually insane. Crazy how you can put so much faith in Nadeau and in the same breath say that Thomas hasn't proven himself to be a 1C. For what its worth Aho isn't playing 1C to any of the people you listed either.</div></div>
It’s actually impressive the way he spins things over and over.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 13 h 18
Sujet:
More ReTool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_K</b></div><div>To be honest there's so many different things going on with this team right now that I can't tell what direction is the right way to go. Hopefully Doug chooses one.
By my assessment though, rougher goaltending would've made this season the low-water mark. Now that might still happen this-coming year - with or without a Binner/Hofer combo (goaltending can be fickle). As exciting and promising as some of the younger guys are, they're not all here yet. And the veterans are just getting another year older, slower, etc. Wouldn't be the worst thing to be patient for another year and try to make some low-risk, high-reward moves to set up for the future.</div></div>
I’m more concerned about the Kyrou and Thomas iteration of the core. I’d consider those two and Parayko the core currently.
I think the most beneficial thing we could do would be to add a solid defenseman in the 24-27 age range. However in order to do that, we’re going to have to cut bait with either Krug or Faulk which I don’t think is a huge deal.
Ultimately I think the plan will be to middle out like this while contracts expire and then once they do make a large splash with a UFA defenseman if we can’t find one before. The issue with that is it’s rare those higher end caliber defenseman hit UFA status, because as we can all see, when you let one go you create a massive problem trying to stop gap or piece together the hole that’s left behind.
It’s definitely not a perfect plan, but there really is no perfect plan. I’d imagine we try and find a way to address a 2nd line center and move out a defenseman in hopes of adding another that can profile to be more of a two-way guy than we currently have.
I’d be shocked if our first pick in this draft was a forward, but there’s certainly an avenue where that could happen.
Truthfully I know it’s very unlikely, but I would move our 1st if we could get a guy like Harley out of Dallas.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 12 h 18
Sujet:
playoff without Jake
While i don't disagree that someone would take Reilly Smith for a late round pick, it will be after almost every higher end UFA is already under contract. I'd guess if you wanted to do it before you'd have to pay a pretty hefty price to move that salary.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 12 h 17
Sujet:
Big Deal with ST Louis
Would you trade Aho for that?
It's impractical to ask for a team to trade a young core piece that's signed long term to an extremely team friendly deal for pieces like that. That is the piece we are building around and have been for the last 2-3 years. There's no logical situation in which we tear down the centerpiece and expect good things to happen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 12 h 14
Sujet:
More ReTool
If our direction is to be worse next season than this I don't dislike any of the moves aside from the Leddy to Pittsburgh move.
However, as exciting as it is picking 10th vs 16th, I don't think it makes all too much of a difference once you look 5 years down the road. Don't get me wrong I would love for the Blues to trade up, but I don't think we're at the point where we can trade Binnington and not crumble. We may not make playoffs again next year, but after this year you have to expect the expectation would be to do so from the front office and from the players alone. Culture and belief in being able to win isn't something that's really too popular on here because you can't quantify it and compare. But I'd venture to guess if we made 2 or 3 moves to sell off pieces and finished towards the bottom of the league next year it would be crippling to the young core that we're building right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 avr. à 11 h 3
Sujet:
Any Shot Cozens is Available
Can't see Buffalo entertaining moving Cozens.
Also, signing Skjei long term to a large contract would probably be worse than doing nothing at all on the backend.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 avr. à 2 h 38
Sujet:
Seider skates like Bambi
Don’t see a reason for the Blues to do that. Sure on paper it removes a year off of the cap commitment. But those are two players who don’t move the puck very well and we already have a bit of a deficiency in that department on our backend.
Faulk should be pretty easily tradeable after next season with the movement clause becoming limited.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. à 16 h 53
Sujet:
Rebuilt it
Faulk isn't waiving for San Jose. And there's nothing in there that would garner the Blues moving a 3rd for, let alone moving Faulk for. I get the idea, but the value is wacky to say the least.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. à 10 h 35
Sujet:
No More Meatballs
Truthfully, I don't see hardly any of a need for any of those pieces in a Buch return.
Completely understand the rationale. But unless we'd somehow move out Krug without retaining any salary, I don't see how or why we'd want to add Samuelsson. Not a bad player by any means, but he's more of what we have and would probably slot below Leddy anyways.
Really don't see a need for Rosen. Good prospect, doesn't fit a need though.
Could almost see it as more of a benefit if Rosen and Samuelsson played opposite positions. Middle 6 forward and a top 4 D prospect versus a 2nd pair defenseman and top 6 forward prospect.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 avr. à 9 h 43
Sujet:
Flyers
Last thing the Blues need to do is add more salary to the backend via a very average to below average defenseman at the expense of another part of their roster.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. à 0 h 2
Sujet:
What is your offer for Chychrun
Can’t really see the Blues adding a Chychrun unless they somehow moved out both Krug and Faulk. He’s pretty much just a younger LHD Faulk, I’m not sure both together would be a great idea.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 2 h 31
Sujet:
Ideal set up for next year
Would be very interesting to see the difference in impact a 10th overall pick has versus a 16th overall pick.
Unless the Blues would’ve done some mighty fine **** show tanking to end the season you likely weren’t getting in to the top 8.
There’s a very real possibility that this group finishing with 90+ points this season has a much more beneficial outcome than moving up 5-6 spots in the draft would’ve. Obviously we’d all rather pick there. But at the same time if you’re picking there you are desperately in need of making roster changes this offseason which we aren’t in a great position to do. Not to mention the confidence this very likely will instill in our young group that they can hang.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 2 h 24
Sujet:
Buch stays as 2c
You do realize that by buying out Krug you are tying a cap commitment for many more seasons and are essentially paying the same cap hit once you factor in the very odd signing of Vakimaki for next season right?
There are reasons to buy Krug out. But if your solution is re-signing Perunovich and signing Valimaki you are much better just keeping Krug and playing him as a 3rd pairing guy at even strength unless the situation calls for more offense.
He’s small yes, and it limits his defensive capabilities. But I see no reason to believe Valimaki is any better defensively, and he is much worse of a PPQB and offensive threat than Krug.
I don’t mind Hague, I think he could develop into a good 2nd pairing shutdown guy, he’s probably pretty close to there now. Roy is also a pretty good player. Maybe cap commitments to others could pry them away from Vegas, but I’d doubt it.
There are situations in which I’d be happy with the Blues giving up that haul to jump from 16 to 10 (as of now) but you better be 100% positive the guy you’re getting at that position will be a big piece of your future. I see no reason for NJD to do something like that though. I could however see them doing something similar if Binnington were a piece of the trade which I’m not sure we’ve reached that crossroads this offseason.
Signing Sam Reinhart to a massive contract on a career year is a very very risky gamble to take. Good chance in a. Different set of circumstances, you’ve just inked Huberdeau 2.0.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 16 h 11
Sujet:
Sens 24-25
Don't really see Chychrun as a great fit. Also don't see any way Saad would waive for Ottawa.
Don't really dislike the player, I just don't feel he's much different than Justin Faulk aside from younger and left handed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 12 h 4
Sujet:
Blues next year opening day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheEarthmaster</b></div><div>The other thing to be mindful of here is what is really the upside of going scorched earth on Krug. They need to be moving out the bad contracts and Krug certainly has one, but if you're adding around half of his cap hit as dead money (either in a retention trade or in a buyout) PLUS signing Hanifin to a big extension, you're tying up more money in your defense on veteran players than you are right now. Has that worked out well at all for the Blues over the last couple years? Signing a big UFA player into his thirties is a win-now move. You're banking on getting a few good years in which you can hopefully win a cup and then deal with the bad years later. That doesn't track with where the Blues are. They are not winning now.
I've said it a million times but it would be malpractice for the Blues to add any more veterans with significant term/money contracts until they get rid of their commitments they currently have. If you're retaining or buying out Krug, you're getting rid of some of the commitment but not all of it. To reinforce this roster with an additional pricey veteran? I just don't see the point.</div></div>
I would agree with almost everything here. I think we also often overstate the degree of detriment in which Krug is to the roster. Regardless of how frustrating it is watching him he is a very high end puck mover.
The other thing is, i'm not sure the organization is of the same mindset that we're that far off for some odd reason. I think if we could clear out Krug's cap hit, they would heavily pursue a guy like hanifin. If not I still see us as having a bit of a deficiency with production from the backend that the organization will probably try and remedy this offseason with a low cost signing or trade. I think that's kind of the directive they took with the Krug for Sanheim deal that had arose last offseason.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 11 h 31
Sujet:
Blues next year opening day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>letsgoblues1967</b></div><div>Why do people always re-sign Alexandrov in these projections? Hasn't he shown he is not an NHL caliber player?</div></div>
I think it's for the sake of simplicity. I'd imagine if he were re-signed it would be to a 2way, 1 year deal hoping that he takes an offseason regimen a bit more seriously this offseason. Was reported that he was a little out of shape coming in to this season.
Regardless, the name probably would be different in the scratched part, but it's really hard to tell who it would be. Army generally brings in 2 or 3 guys on PTOs it seems like that are experienced vets that are either on their last leg or tweeners that it could pretty easily be instead for around the same cap hit.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 11 h 21
Sujet:
Blues next year opening day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Moss_Bucket</b></div><div>Yeah, I think your post about buying him out would likely be the option for St. Louis.</div></div>
Would have to imagine if the Blues were to line up another trade for Krug that made sense there would be a conversation of if you don't take this we're going to send you to Springfield. I guess I get it trying to be respectful to the player the first go around. But regardless, if Army wouldn't exercise the option to waive the player to strongarm a trade, there's virtually 0 reason for him to be so strongly against NMCs and still hand out NTCs. There's alot of dialogue that that's the main reason Petro left.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. à 10 h 17
Sujet:
Feeling Blues
You’re barking up the wrong tree if you want to trade for Thomas.
Switching in Kyrou for Thomas in this proposal as others have said could make some sense. We’re still killing our already weak scoring depth in doing so, and I really fail to see any clear separation between Kyrou and Tkachuk.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 avr. à 10 h 16
Sujet:
Kubalik
Bottom 6 scorers that don’t score at a high rate are a dime a dozen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 2 h 38
Sujet:
Bringing in proven winners
Front office seems pretty adamant about trying to compete sooner rather than later. Can’t see them moving Parayko with the main return being futures.
Not going to comment on value. Just wouldn’t make sense unless the player requested to be moved. We can’t replace him, and chances of someone signing in the offseason to try and stop gap the hole it would leave after a trade like this is essentially 0.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 2 h 32
Sujet:
This has to be better
Very hard to move out 3 contracts like that in an offseason. Even harder to lure that many UFAs in all at the same time.
Trade market usually opens up after the bigger UFAs have signed
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 avr. à 21 h 39
Sujet:
hehe
Would be ok with that as a Blues fan. I’d imagine most will hate it though. Fits the mould of a low risk acquisition that can play at the NHL level, although the player himself is turbulent.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 17 h 55
Sujet:
Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lsendel3</b></div><div>O come on now. It was and is a **** return. Spin it however you want, most likely they sold their last chance with Sid to win anything for more than likely 3rd line guys in 3 years. I remember the O’Reilly trade, Blues fans were thumping their chests pretty loudly and rightfully so. And for 4 years it looked like Buffalo would have had 1.5 seasons of Vlad to show for ROR. I know I’m jumping from trade to trade here, but I can tell you from talking with Pittsburgh fans, they’ve accepted they got basically nothing and like you said a hard to move 2nd/3rd liner.</div></div>
I mean you’re communicating with fans on a site where the premise is building salary cap darlings without getting actual on ice results.
You’re never going to be happy trading a guy like that while trying to be in a competitive window. But it’s far too early to tell if those players are as worthless as they probably beleive them to be right now.
Let’s look at a team like Boston. Who is the last truly exciting prospect they’ve had, top of the pool destined for greatness? Probably haven’t had one since McAvoy. But they still churn out guys like Poitras that come expectedly out of nowhere. Last year the echo was Boston doesn’t have good enough prospects aside from Lohrei to warrant a considerable trade. Poitras was in that pool. Guys rise and fall yearly. It’s a volatile game.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com