SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving Draisaitl and Nurse

Créé par: MW6
Équipe: 2024-25 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2024
Publié: 26 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I’m not an Oiler fan so I may be way out of line here, and if so I apologize. But Is this a good trade off?

Draisaitl, Ceci, Campbell

For

Guentzel, Dylan Strome, Arvidsson, TVR and Lindgren? Plus a bluechip prospect in Ryan Leonard.

The JG, DS, VA will offset the points of Draisatl while adding depth and economic stability for McD and Bouchard extensions.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
78 250 000 $
23 750 000 $
32 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Leonard, Ryan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Lindgren, Charlie
  3. Strome, Dylan
  4. van Riemsdyk, Trevor (1 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
2C on a great contract
Cheap 3RD
Cheap 1B goalie
Bluechip prospect
WSH
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. Ceci, Cody
  3. Draisaitl, Leon
Détails additionnels:
Saves EDM 9,15M in cap space.
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2088 000 000 $85 566 667 $3 550 000 $0 $2 433 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 4
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
mer. à 16 h 10
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: MW6
I’m sorry, I had him mixed up with Marc-Edouard. I’m embarrassed. I was thinking two veterans who might want to coattail and McDavid for a/another chance at a cup.


That makes a ton of sense, all good. For what it’s worth, If we were trading the other Vlasic I’d still decline but that’s in the top 50% of trades proposed involving the Hawks in terms of being balanced.
MW6 a aimé ceci.
mer. à 16 h 11
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,510
Mentions "j'aime": 10,161
Quoting: MW6
Oh, jeez.. I’m so sorry, I mixed him up with Marc-Eduard! What an embarrassment I am! No need to chastise me for this!


He's the younger cousin of MEV
MW6 a aimé ceci.
mer. à 16 h 19
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: Jco5ta5
That's a bit rich bud. He was great and he may still improve but he's not a franchise defenseman like you're suggesting here with the top 5 pick. Nurse also won't cost "multiple 1sts" that is absurd. PLD got traded 1 to 1 with zero retention.

That said: mw6 there really is no way you're getting Foligno who is basically the team's captain and Vlasic who is the team's current best defenseman and put up pretty solid metrics on a horrific D corp last year in his rookie season. If he hadn't had a few extra games prior to this season already he would've been talked about in the Calder voting, but he didn't qualify. Nurse and Jones are arguably two of the worst contracts in the league. No way Chicago wants or needs him.

For everyone else reading this post, Davidson is building a team of his own vision. Anything he's acquired, signed, or drafted is likely OFF the table. He appears very calculated in his moves so acquiring and signing Foligno and signing Vlasic to 6 years is purposeful and he's not going to then just flip them for parts. I encourage you before you make an ACGM involving Chicago, it shouldn't involve any Davidson pieces.


I strongly disagree on being a franchise defenseman. Last season, the Hawks were outscored 51-50 at 5v5 with Vlasic on the ice. I don’t have the numbers for 5v5 without Vlasic, but if we include all 5v5 goals with a goalie pulled, the Hawks were out scored 89-186 without Vlasic. That’s a goal share of 49% vs 32%. He was one of the best defensive defenseman in the league last season. He’s already a top-pairing defenseman, if not a #1 defenseman. But he was one game away from being a rookie last season; it’s very likely that he gets better; and he’s signed for 6 years at $4.67 million per year, which would become one of the best contracts in the league if he continues to develop even a little bit more. I’d take that over Sam Dickinson or Zeev Buium.
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
mer. à 16 h 29
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,475
Mentions "j'aime": 2,346
Quoting: MW6
Haha, ouch! Sorry, I thought a Nurse-Jones pairing would be intriguing smile


Ok, so you took my reply in stride instead of getting bent out of shape (like many here do) . So thank you & I will stop poking the doll.
On a serious note: we will probably never see what a Nurse Jones pairing is like because they are both overpaid. Hawks don’t mind Jones as he is by far the best option they have at top pairing RD but can’t see them being willing to take Nurse w/o being paid handsomely to do so.
Vlasic is part of the future core & only slightly lest untouchable than Bedard.
MW6 et PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
mer. à 16 h 43
#30
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 305
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: FarhanLuigi
I cant believe I'm saying this, as I continually tell people here that cap space is a great return in itself.
Your overrating cap space.
These superstar players like McDavid, MacKinnon and Draisaitl will always be underpaid because of the max cap limit. You are never saving money trading away special talent like that.


I hear you and I agree to some extent! But surrounding McDavid with as many good to great contracts as possible in his prime should be the no.1 priority. There’s a business approach to it as well. Risk diversification. McD, Drai, Hyman, Kane, RNH is a really strong top-6, but if McD or Drai can’t play they’re probably not contending. If anyone is injured in the proposed top-9 they still got a shot because of the depth IMO. Which leads me back, again, to my question. Would this lineup improve McDavid’s/Edmonton’s chances of winning?
mer. à 16 h 49
#31
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 305
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: YeahRighttt
Ok, so you took my reply in stride instead of getting bent out of shape (like many here do) . So thank you & I will stop poking the doll.
On a serious note: we will probably never see what a Nurse Jones pairing is like because they are both overpaid. Hawks don’t mind Jones as he is by far the best option they have at top pairing RD but can’t see them being willing to take Nurse w/o being paid handsomely to do so.
Vlasic is part of the future core & only slightly lest untouchable than Bedard.


Appreciate it buddy!
Yeah, that’s what was so alluring about it, the 19M$ pair who should earn 11-12 and play 18-19 minutes a night smile Didn’t mean to disrespect the Hawks though.. since it probably wouldn’t have been as funny for you guys wink
mer. à 18 h 2
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,488
Mentions "j'aime": 1,928
Quoting: FarhanLuigi
There are 6 much more impactful defenceman available in this draft over Vlasic. That is my point.


Now who is being absurd. I guarantee you looking 5 years down the road there will not be 6 defensemen in this draft that are better than Vlassic. That is crazy talk. But as others have stated, last year Vlassic was one of the top shut-down defenseman in the NHL.
mer. à 20 h 17
#33
OldSLIMEfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 236
Quoting: klassic
Now who is being absurd. I guarantee you looking 5 years down the road there will not be 6 defensemen in this draft that are better than Vlassic. That is crazy talk. But as others have stated, last year Vlassic was one of the top shut-down defenseman in the NHL.


Ok Miss Cleo
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage