SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dubas magic trick

Créé par: LuckyMoneyPuck
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2024
Publié: 26 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is the only way I would accept a KK trade to this team.
Truth is 6 years of almost 5 mil, they may have to pay more. But this is a general idea.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3975 000 $
3975 000 $
3975 000 $
3975 000 $
3975 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2825 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (UTA)
2.
PIT
  1. Kotkaniemi, Jesperi
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
CAR pays to get out of a really bad contract. They take back Acciari to help make it work. It saves them almost 3 mil in cap space, 4+ if Acciari is Buried in the AHL.
They also have to option of flipping him. He's a low cap hit and still a decent 4th line center.
3.
PIT
  1. McGroarty, Rutger [Liste de réserve]
WPG
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PHI
Logo de UTA
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $78 986 009 $0 $57 500 $9 013 991 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
975 000 $975 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
mer. à 12 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 17,696
Mentions "j'aime": 7,733
Modifié mer. à 12 h 56
I don't think a couple late picks will be competitive for McGroarty.
mer. à 12 h 49
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 515
Mentions "j'aime": 163
I don’t think Utah is interested honestly

Goaltending isn’t much their issue
mer. à 12 h 49
#3
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Windjammer
I don't think a couple late picks will be competative for McGroarty.


we know we know... you're expectations are the world.
Then there is reality. Please sit down.
mer. à 12 h 51
#4
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Mikael_Smith
I don’t think Utah is interested honestly

Goaltending isn’t much their issue


Utah is in the market for a goalie. This isn't even debatable.
mer. à 12 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 17
I think that's close on rutger. Don't think Carolina gives a 1st just to get rid of 4mil in KK. Also smith is all but gone(hopefully for laine).
mer. à 13 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 515
Mentions "j'aime": 163
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
we know we know... you're expectations are the world.
Then there is reality. Please sit down.


It’s really not out of this worldly to say a guy drafted 14th overall, with very good junior numbers could be traded for more than the 27th and 46th? Would not be surprised if it costs more than this? A better offer can absolutely be reached by a team like even San Jose, Chicago, or Utah all of these teams have a ton of draft capital, including earlier picks than the Penguins. I would agree that a 1st and a 2nd isn’t a bad trade for McGoarty, and is honestly fair, but a very late first, and a middle second is not enough imo
Quillanrocks et Mr_Canoehead a aimé ceci.
mer. à 13 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 1,213
Mentions "j'aime": 494
Quoting: Mikael_Smith
It’s really not out of this worldly to say a guy drafted 14th overall, with very good junior numbers could be traded for more than the 27th and 46th? Would not be surprised if it costs more than this? A better offer can absolutely be reached by a team like even San Jose, Chicago, or Utah all of these teams have a ton of draft capital, including earlier picks than the Penguins. I would agree that a 1st and a 2nd isn’t a bad trade for McGoarty, and is honestly fair, but a very late first, and a middle second is not enough imo


Second this
Mikael_Smith a aimé ceci.
mer. à 13 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,084
Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
Canes pass, rather do the buyout
mer. à 13 h 5
#9
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Tonio
I think that's close on rutger. Don't think Carolina gives a 1st just to get rid of 4mil in KK. Also smith is all but gone(hopefully for laine).


Smith is here till he is gone. I don't think the team is overly worried about moving Smith. His contract ends this year. Fixing this team is not a 1 year solution, it's a long term project. They need to focus on longer term fixes than worry about Smith's expiring deal.
mer. à 13 h 10
#10
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Mikael_Smith
It’s really not out of this worldly to say a guy drafted 14th overall, with very good junior numbers could be traded for more than the 27th and 46th? Would not be surprised if it costs more than this? A better offer can absolutely be reached by a team like even San Jose, Chicago, or Utah all of these teams have a ton of draft capital, including earlier picks than the Penguins. I would agree that a 1st and a 2nd isn’t a bad trade for McGoarty, and is honestly fair, but a very late first, and a middle second is not enough imo


you are never going to get full value on him, The PHL trade shows that.
WPG fans refuse to recognize this.
It's ok, Pens fens refused to think Jake would bring back the return he did.

At some point you get over it and stop carrying what the emotionally damaged have to think, and get back down to reality.
It's a fair offer.
PS. SJS, CHI etc.. aren't giving up their picks not to mention WPG isn't going to trade to the WC teams. Just like PHL wouldn't deal to the EC teams.
There is a reason PHL settled for a 2nd and a oft injured disgruntled struggling player who fell out of favor in ANA.... just look at his play in PHL and realize what they got in return.
That market isn't what you want it to be.
mer. à 13 h 10
#11
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Canes pass, rather do the buyout


be my guest, pay 12 years on a buyout.
mer. à 13 h 12
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,084
Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
be my guest, pay 12 years on a buyout.


It’s only 830k lol, that’ll be league minimum in a few years

Canes aren’t giving up a first to get rid of players especially in division
mer. à 13 h 22
#13
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Canesfan21_
It’s only 830k lol, that’ll be league minimum in a few years

Canes aren’t giving up a first to get rid of players especially in division


You got 3 choices.
1. you can keep that almost 5 mil cap hit for the next at least 3 years as no one is touching a contract that long at that price for a bottom 6 player.
2. you can buy him out and be paying him for basically the career of many players on the team aka over a decade. I assure you, no matter how little you think the contract is. NO team wants to be buying a guy out for 12 years.
3. You can pay to dump him. A 1st is the minimum you will pay to dump that contract. If you don't think so, Jake Walman 3.4x2 cost a 2nd to dump.
4.8 x 6 is going to cost well more than that.

So maybe get over yourself.
Come to terms with the fact that it's a bad contract.
Realize there is a price to pay to dump it.
A late round 1st isn't going to make or Break CAR, but having an almost 5 mil per bad contract on their books for the next 6 years will be a real pain in the butt to deal with.

So don't come to me acting like the ask there is outrageous. It's not. If anything it's letting you off the hook easy.
mer. à 13 h 25
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,084
Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
You got 3 choices.
1. you can keep that almost 5 mil cap hit for the next at least 3 years as no one is touching a contract that long at that price for a bottom 6 player.
2. you can buy him out and be paying him for basically the career of many players on the team aka over a decade. I assure you, no matter how little you think the contract is. NO team wants to be buying a guy out for 12 years.
3. You can pay to dump him. A 1st is the minimum you will pay to dump that contract. If you don't think so, Jake Walman 3.4x2 cost a 2nd to dump.
4.8 x 6 is going to cost well more than that.

So maybe get over yourself.
Come to terms with the fact that it's a bad contract.
Realize there is a price to pay to dump it.
A late round 1st isn't going to make or Break CAR, but having an almost 5 mil per bad contract on their books for the next 6 years will be a real pain in the butt to deal with.

So don't come to me acting like the ask there is outrageous. It's not. If anything it's letting you off the hook easy.


Walman shouldn’t have been a dump, everyone knows Yzerman sucks at being a GM besides drafting.

That’s not the canes philosophy, they hate selling low on players, they absolutely will keep him and give him a shot to bounce back before paying a first to dump him. He had a really good year in 22-23 and started this season well. It isn’t a great contract still but I do believe he will bounce back.
mer. à 13 h 34
#15
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Walman shouldn’t have been a dump, everyone knows Yzerman sucks at being a GM besides drafting.

That’s not the canes philosophy, they hate selling low on players, they absolutely will keep him and give him a shot to bounce back before paying a first to dump him. He had a really good year in 22-23 and started this season well. It isn’t a great contract still but I do believe he will bounce back.


You can stop trying to blame Yzerman.... he paid market value to dump cap. That's what it costs.

Teams aren't just here to take your cap for nothing, they want something in return.

As much as you think he will bounce back his year in 21-22 was no better than this year.

He is what he is, and that is a guy who should not be on that contract.
He's been in CAR long enough now, that they know what they got and it's not working out.
They would move that contract if they could. Some of you canes fans know it. Some of you think that everyone else is there to take it from you for nothing..... that's not going to happen.
No matter what your "philosophy" is on moving players.
mer. à 13 h 42
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,084
Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
You can stop trying to blame Yzerman.... he paid market value to dump cap. That's what it costs.

Teams aren't just here to take your cap for nothing, they want something in return.

As much as you think he will bounce back his year in 21-22 was no better than this year.

He is what he is, and that is a guy who should not be on that contract.
He's been in CAR long enough now, that they know what they got and it's not working out.
They would move that contract if they could. Some of you canes fans know it. Some of you think that everyone else is there to take it from you for nothing..... that's not going to happen.
No matter what your "philosophy" is on moving players.


Well Mike Grier had no problem helping his old pals in New York for free, so maybe Don Waddell would take KK LMAO

He had a better year in 21-22 than this season. 2 more points in 13 less games. If they can find the right price to move him, they’ll do it. But as an analytics based team, trading a high quality asset like that to get rid of a player doesn’t make sense
mer. à 13 h 48
#17
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Well Mike Grier had no problem helping his old pals in New York for free, so maybe Don Waddell would take KK LMAO

He had a better year in 21-22 than this season. 2 more points in 13 less games. If they can find the right price to move him, they’ll do it. But as an analytics based team, trading a high quality asset like that to get rid of a player doesn’t make sense


If you think a late round fist is a High quality asset then you haven't be paying attention at TDL. Teams move them all the time for little more than a rental.
Using one to move out a 6 year bad contract is not some high cost.
But hey. When you are carrying that contract for 4 more years, maybe you'll look back on it and say, we should have moved that contract years ago.
mer. à 14 h 6
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Smith is here till he is gone. I don't think the team is overly worried about moving Smith. His contract ends this year. Fixing this team is not a 1 year solution, it's a long term project. They need to focus on longer term fixes than worry about Smith's expiring deal.


Jarry's also here til he's gone and you traded him so
mer. à 14 h 29
#19
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Tonio
Jarry's also here til he's gone and you traded him so


Jarry is hardly the point of this ACGM, nor does his cap hit matter here, it easily fits.

Jarry is also a whole lot easier to move than Smith is. All I hear is people like you, Smith needs to be traded.... he's hardly the one that needs to be traded and they aren't retaining on him s there is no better option at the retained amount. So he's here, period. He will remain here unless they actually move him.
Jarry on the other hand is much more likely to be moved if they are opening up room for Blom. Which I'm clearly doing as I'm trying to give the young players space.
So get over it.
mer. à 15 h 43
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
Jarry is hardly the point of this ACGM, nor does his cap hit matter here, it easily fits.

Jarry is also a whole lot easier to move than Smith is. All I hear is people like you, Smith needs to be traded.... he's hardly the one that needs to be traded and they aren't retaining on him s there is no better option at the retained amount. So he's here, period. He will remain here unless they actually move him.
Jarry on the other hand is much more likely to be moved if they are opening up room for Blom. Which I'm clearly doing as I'm trying to give the young players space.
So get over it.


Easier to move jarry than smith hahahah
mer. à 16 h 47
#21
Démarrer sujet
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 4,075
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: Tonio
Easier to move jarry than smith hahahah


oh really who is replacing him?
They don't have anyone on the roster to replace him yet. The one guy they have is Koivunen but he's not ready yet. He just got to the AHL.
When you have to retain 2.5 mil on him, then what winger are you getting who in a down year can put up 40 points, especially at 2.5 mil per. Which is the cap equivalent.
There is none. That's the answer to that. The market sucks, it's weak on wingers. There isn't much available that is any better than he is.
Most teams aren't going to come looking for a trade until after FA. So there won't be anyone out there.

Which is why you're argument is a dead end.
It's harder to move him because it's harder to replace him.
In the mean time, they got Blom just sitting there ready to get his crack at the NHL level to replace Jarry, who they simply have to move out.
So yeah, it's easier to move Jarry than it is to move Smith.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage