SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Spend that money

Créé par: bf_hockey8
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 13 juin 2024
Publié: 13 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Obviously the length of the Kadri deal is risky but I imagine Calgary would jump at the opportunity (maybe it doesn’t even take a 2nd)
I think this is a better route for the B’s than overpaying Lindholm
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
87 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $85 015 834 $50 000 $330 000 $2 984 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juin à 13 h 20
#1
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,748
Mentions "j'aime": 624
Kadri had 75 points last year, why would Calgary trade him for only a 2nd?
13 juin à 13 h 26
#2
must have cap space
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: lowblocksniper
Kadri had 75 points last year, why would Calgary trade him for only a 2nd?


This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.
13 juin à 13 h 27
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 187
CGY has no reason to trade him they aren't going to compete for a bit
They don't need to be clearing salary and Kadri is a decent C to play with their young wing prospects
13 juin à 13 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: NJTM
This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.


Can't really see CGY ownership approving a complete tear down and rebuild
13 juin à 13 h 32
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,924
Mentions "j'aime": 7,466
lol please spend that money more intelligently than this don.
13 juin à 13 h 32
#6
must have cap space
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 286
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: Quaider11
Can't really see CGY ownership approving a complete tear down and rebuild


That would be the only kicker here. The idea is good in theory, but ownership probably won’t allow it. I do think a complete tear down is necessary in Calgary. Players that have left in the past few years include Hanifin, Zadorov, Tanev, Gaudreau, Tkachuk, Toffoli, Monahan etc.

They may as well fully commit to it, a lot of the really good players they had are gone already.
Quaider11 a aimé ceci.
13 juin à 13 h 33
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,924
Mentions "j'aime": 7,466
Quoting: lowblocksniper
Kadri had 75 points last year, why would Calgary trade him for only a 2nd?


if i was the GM of a bad team with a guy about to turn 34 with seven years left on his deal, i'd be thrilled to get a trade offer for him.
bf_hockey8 a aimé ceci.
13 juin à 13 h 35
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: NJTM
That would be the only kicker here. The idea is good in theory, but ownership probably won’t allow it. I do think a complete tear down is necessary in Calgary. Players that have left in the past few years include Hanifin, Zadorov, Tanev, Gaudreau, Tkachuk, Toffoli, Monahan etc.

They may as well fully commit to it, a lot of the really good players they had are gone already.


They certainly should but similarly to the Jacobs family I think CGY's ownership is hyperfixated on revenue
13 juin à 13 h 44
#9
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,748
Mentions "j'aime": 624
Quoting: NJTM
This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.


Calgary has 20mil in capspace with only Pelletier, Wolf and Kylington to resign shouldn't take more than 7mil total and Markstrom likely to be traded, leaving them with about 19mil in capspace.

getting a 2nd for Kadri doesn't help them
13 juin à 13 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 176
Calgary is not moving Kadri for only a late 2nd round pick. He'd actually be a really good fit for Boston though, but that offer is brutal!

He's fair value at $7M for the next couple years at least and we still need to hit the cap floor / have good veteran mentors for a rebuilding effort. My guess is he's only moved on the back end of the 5 remaining years on his deal.
13 juin à 14 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Hell no to Kadri but I wouldn't mind seeing Toffoli for a year or two.
13 juin à 17 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,964
Mentions "j'aime": 20,544
Quoting: NJTM
This actually makes some sense this trade. It completely clears Calgary of Nazem Kadri’s cap hit. If the goal is to completely strip the team down and rebuild, this is a good trade.

Calgary can use that $7M to take on bad contracts for high draft picks and prospects. They could load up on draft picks like Arizona/Utah did. Utah has 10 2nd round picks in the next three years. Those can be consolidated into first round picks or traded for players.

The most important thing Calgary would gain is cap space which they could weaponize in other ways.


Calgary is going to be barely above the cap floor next season. Kadri's cap hit is not remotely an issue, its just his term
13 juin à 20 h 38
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 216
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: CN10
Calgary is not moving Kadri for only a late 2nd round pick. He'd actually be a really good fit for Boston though, but that offer is brutal!

He's fair value at $7M for the next couple years at least and we still need to hit the cap floor / have good veteran mentors for a rebuilding effort. My guess is he's only moved on the back end of the 5 remaining years on his deal.


My point is that if Calgary waits 2 years to trade Kadri, it could get to the point where they need to give up assets to get someone to take on his contract. Having to give up assets wouldn’t be ideal in a time when they’d be trying to turn the corner competitively
14 juin à 16 h 32
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 176
Quoting: bf_hockey8
My point is that if Calgary waits 2 years to trade Kadri, it could get to the point where they need to give up assets to get someone to take on his contract. Having to give up assets wouldn’t be ideal in a time when they’d be trying to turn the corner competitively


I think retention is an option or a buy-out if he becomes a complete boat anchor those last couple years (he's not bonus based like Huberdeau's deal). It would be a nice problem to have if it only takes Conroy two years to turn this thing around. I'm expecting the Flames will be bad for a couple more years and then having star players on ELC's allows them to pay Kadri $7M to play 3rd line minutes and PP2.

I get your point, that the Flames may want to not have an expensive veteran on the books coming out of a rebuild, and there's a good fit for him in Boston, but the value back isn't there for Calgary with just the 2nd.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage